Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T11:58:39.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Shallow two-component gravity-driven flows with vertical variation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2013

Julia Kowalski
Affiliation:
WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Flüelastrasse 11, CH-7260 Davos Dorf, Switzerland
Jim N. McElwaine*
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 0WA, UK WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Flüelastrasse 11, CH-7260 Davos Dorf, Switzerland Planetary Science Institute, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA
*
Email address for correspondence: jnm11@cam.ac.uk

Abstract

Gravity-driven geophysical mass flows often consist of a heterogeneous fluid–solid mixture. The complex interplay between the components leads to phenomena such as lateral levee formation in avalanches, or a granular front and an excess fluid pore pressure in debris flows. These effects are very important for predicting runout and the forces on structures, yet they are only partially represented in simplified shallow flow theories, since rearrangement of the mixture composition perpendicular to the main flow direction is neglected. In realistic flows, however, rheological properties and effective basal drag may depend strongly on the relative concentration of the components. We address this problem and present a depth-averaged model for shallow mixtures that explicitly allows for rearrangement in this direction. In particular we consider a fluid–solid mixture that experiences bulk horizontal motion, as well as internal sedimentation and resuspension of the particles, and therefore resembles the case of a debris flow. Starting from general mixture theory we derive bulk balance laws and an evolution equation for the particle concentration. Depth-integration yields a shallow mixture flow model in terms of bulk mass, depth-averaged particle concentration, the particle vertical centre of mass and the depth-averaged velocity. This new equation in this model for the particle vertical centre of mass is derived by taking the first moment, with respect to the vertical coordinate, of the particle mass conservation equation. Our approach does not make the Boussinesq approximation and results in additional terms coupling the momentum flux to the vertical centre of mass. The system is hyperbolic and reduces to the shallow-water equations in the homogeneous limit of a pure fluid or perfect mixing. We highlight the effects of sedimentation on resuspension and finally present a simple friction feedback which qualitatively resembles a large-scale experimental debris flow data set acquired at the Illgraben, Switzerland.

Type
Papers
Copyright
©2013 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartelt, P., Salm, B. & Gruber, U. 1999 Calculating dense-snow avalanche runout using a voellmy-fluid model with active/passive longitudinal straining. J. Glaciol. 45 (150), 242254.Google Scholar
Benny, D. J. 1973 Some properties of long nonlinear waves. Stud. Appl. Maths 52, 4550.Google Scholar
Berres, S., Bürger, R. & Tory, E. M. 2005 On mathematical models and numerical simulation of the fluidization of polydisperse suspensions. Appl. Math. Model. 29, 159193.Google Scholar
Berzi, D. & Jenkins, J. T. 2009 Steady inclined flows of granular-fluid mixtures. J. Fluid Mech. 641, 359387.Google Scholar
Boyer, F., Guazzelli, É. & Pouliquen, O. 2011 Unifying suspension and granular rheology. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 188301.Google Scholar
Cassar, C., Nicolas, M. & Pouliquen, O. 2005 Submarine granular flows down inclined planes. Phys. Fluids 17, 103301.Google Scholar
Christen, M., Kowalski, J. & Bartelt, P. 2010 Ramms: numerical simulation of dense snow avalanches in three-dimensional terrain. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 63 (1–2), 114.Google Scholar
Denlinger, R. P. & Iverson, R. M. 2001 Flow of variably fluidized granular masses across three-dimensional terrain 2. Numerical predictions and experimental tests. J. Geophys. Res. 106 (B1), 553566.Google Scholar
Drew, D. A. & Passman, S. L. 1998 Theory of Multicomponent Fluids. Springer.Google Scholar
Gray, J. M. N. T. 2002 Rapid granular avalanches. In Dynamic Response of Granular and Porous Material Under Large and Catastrophic Deformations, Lecture Notes in Applied and Computational Mechanics , vol. 11. pp. 342. Springer.Google Scholar
Gray, J. M. N. T. & Chugunov, V. A. 2006 Particle-size segregation and diffusive remixing in shallow granular avalanches. J. Fluid Mech. 569, 365398.Google Scholar
Gray, J. M. N. T. & Kokelaar, B. P. 2010 Large particle segregation, transport and accumulation in granular free-surface flows. J. Fluid Mech. 652, 105137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J. M. N. T. & Thornton, A. R. 2005 A theory for particle size segregation in shallow granular free-surface flows. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 461, 14471473.Google Scholar
Ishii, M. & Hibiki, T. 2006 Thermo-fluid Dynamics of Two-phase Flow. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iverson, R. M. 1997 The physics of debris flows. Rev. Geophys. 35 (3), 245296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iverson, R. M. 2009 Elements of an improved model of debris-flow motion. In Invited Contribution to Powders and Grains 2009 Conference. American Physical Society.Google Scholar
Iverson, R. M. & Denlinger, R. P. 2001 Mechanics of debris flows and debris-laden flash floods. In Seventh Federal Interagency Sedimentation Conference, pp. IV–1–IV–8.Google Scholar
Iverson, R. M. & Major, J. J. 1999 Debris-flow deposition: effects of pore-fluid pressure and friction concentrated at flow margins. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 111 (10), 14241434.Google Scholar
Lavorel, G. & Le Bars, M. 2009 Sedimentation of particles in a vigorously convecting fluid. Phys. Rev. E 80 (4), 046324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McArdell, B., Bartelt, P. & Kowalski, J. 2007 Field observations of basal forces and fluid pore pressure in a debris flow. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, L07406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McArdell, B. W., Zanuttigh, B., Lamberti, A. & Rickenmann, D. 2003 Systematic comparison of debris flows at the Illgraben torrent, Switzerland. In Debris-Flow Hazards Mitigation: Mechanics, Prediction and Assessment, pp. 647657. Millpress.Google Scholar
Pailha, M. & Pouliquen, O. 2008 Initiation of underwater granular avalanches: influence of the initial volume fraction. Phys. Fluids 20, 111701.Google Scholar
Pelanti, M., Bouchut, F. & Mangeney, A. 2008 A roe-type scheme for two-phase shallow granular flows over variable topography. ESAIM: Math. Model. Num. Anal. 42, 851885.Google Scholar
Pitman, E. B. & Le, L. 2005 A two-fluid model for avalanche and debris flow. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 363, 15731601.Google Scholar
Pudasaini, S. P. & Hutter, K. 2007 Avalanche Dynamics–Dynamics of Rapid Flows of Dense Granular Avalanches. Springer.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. F. & Zaki, W. N. 1954 Sedimentation and fluidisation. Part 1. Trans. Inst. Chem. Engng 32, 3553.Google Scholar
Savage, S. B. & Hutter, K. 1989 The motion of a finite mass of a granular material down a rough incline. J. Fluid Mech. 199, 177215.Google Scholar
Savage, S. B. & Hutter, K. 1991 The dynamics of avalanches of granular materials from initiation to runout. part 1: Analysis. Acta Mechanica 86, 201223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheid, B., Ruyer-Quil, C. & Manneville, P. 2006 Wave patterns in film flows: modelling and three-dimensional waves. J. Fluid Mech. 562, 183222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, A. R., Gray, J. M. N. T. & Hogg, A. J. 2006 A three-phase mixture theory for particle size segregation in shallow granular free-surface flows. J. Fluid Mech. 550, 125.Google Scholar
Wieland, M., Gray, J. M. N. T. & Hutter, K. 1999 Channelized free-surface flow of cohesionless granular avalanches in a chute with shallow lateral curvature. J. Fluid Mech. 392, 73100.Google Scholar