Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-8bbf57454-9wdfl Total loading time: 0.249 Render date: 2022-01-24T01:57:05.257Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Shock-induced interfacial instabilities of granular media

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2021

Jiarui Li
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Explosive Science and Technology, Explosion Protection and Emergency Disposal Technology Engineering Research Center of the Ministry of Education, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
Kun Xue*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Explosive Science and Technology, Explosion Protection and Emergency Disposal Technology Engineering Research Center of the Ministry of Education, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
Junsheng Zeng
Affiliation:
Intelligent Energy Lab, Frontier Research Center, Peng Cheng Laboratory, Shenzhen 518000, China
Baolin Tian
Affiliation:
Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics, Beijing 1000871, China
Xiaohu Guo
Affiliation:
Daresbury Laboratory, Warrington WA4 4AD, UK
*
 Email address for correspondence: xuekun@bit.edu.cn

Abstract

This paper investigates the shock-induced instability of the interfaces between gases and dense granular media with finite length via the coarse-grained compressible computational fluid dynamics–discrete parcel method. Despite generating a typical spike-bubble structure reminiscent of the Richtmyer–Meshkov instability (RMI), the shock-driven granular instability (SDGI) is governed by fundamentally different mechanisms. Unlike the RMI arising from baroclinic vorticity deposition on the interface, the SDGI is closely associated with the interfacial and bulk granular dynamics, which evolve with the transient coupling between particles and gases. Consequently, the SDGI follows a growth law distinctly different from that of the RMI, namely a semilinear slow regime followed by an exponentially expedited regime and a quadratic asymptotic regime. We further establish the instability criteria of the SDGI for granular media with infinite and finite lengths, which do not exist in the RMI. A scaling growth law of the SDGI for dense granular media with finite length is derived by normalizing the time with the rarefaction propagation time, which successfully collapses the data from cases with varying shock strength, particle column length and particle volume fraction and ought to hold for granular media with varying particle parameters. The effect of the initial perturbation magnitude can be properly considered in the scaling growth law by incorporating it into the length normalization.

Type
JFM Papers
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aglitskiy, Y. et al. 2010 Basic hydrodynamics of Richtmyer–Meshkov-type growth and oscillations in the inertial confinement fusion-relevant conditions. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A: Math. Phys. Engng Sci. 368, 17391768.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Apte, S., Mahesh, K. & Lundgren, T. 2003 A Eulerlan-Lagrangian model to simulate two-phase/particulate flows. Center for Turbulence Research Annual Research Briefs, 161–171.Google Scholar
Baer, M.R. & Nunziato, J.W. 1986 A two-phase mixture theory for the deflagration-to-detonation transition (ddt) in reactive granular materials. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 12, 861889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Dor, G., Britan, A., Elperin, T., Igra, O. & Jiang, J.P. 1997 Experimental investigation of the interaction between weak shock waves and granular layers. Exp. Fluids 22, 432443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britan, A., Shapiro, H. & Ben-Dor, G. 2007 The contribution of shock tubes to simplified analysis of gas filtration through granular media. J. Fluid Mech. 586, 147176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmouze, Q., Saurel, R., Chiapolino, A. & Lapebie, E. 2020 Riemann solver with internal reconstruction (RSIR) for compressible single-phase and non-equilibrium two-phase flows. J. Comput. Phys. 408, 109176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiapolino, A. & Saurel, R. 2020 Numerical investigations of two-phase finger-like instabilities. Comput. Fluids 206, 104585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, G.C., Dodds, J. & Santamarina, J.C. 2006 Particle shape effects on packing density, stiffness, and strength: natural and crushed sands. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Engng 133, 591602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowe, C.T., Schwarzkopf, J.D., Sommerfeld, M. & Tsuji, Y. 2012 Multiphase Flows with Droplets and Particles. CRC Press.Google Scholar
David, L.F., Yann, G., Oren, P., Samuel, G. & Fan, Z. 2012 Particle jet formation during explosive dispersal of solid particles. Phys. Fluids 24, 091109.Google Scholar
DeMauro, E.P., Wagner, J.L., DeChant, L.J., Beresh, S.J. & Turpin, A.M. 2019 Improved scaling laws for the shock-induced dispersal of a dense particle curtain. J. Fluid Mech. 876, 881895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Felice, R. 1994 The voidage function for fluid-particle interaction systems. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 20, 153159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duke-Walker, V., Maxon, W.C., Almuhna, S.R. & McFarland, J.A. 2021 Evaporation and breakup effects in the shock-driven multiphase instability. J. Fluid Mech. 908, A13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eriksen, F.K., Toussaint, R., Turquet, A.L., Måløy, K.J. & Flekkøy, E.G. 2018 Pressure evolution and deformation of confined granular media during pneumatic fracturing. Phys. Rev. E 97, 012908.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernández-Godino, M.G., Ouellet, F., Haftka, R.T. & Balachandar, S. 2019 Early time evolution of circumferential perturbation of initial particle volume fraction in explosive cylindrical multiphase dispersion. Trans. ASME J. Fluids Engng 141, 091302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Formenti, Y., Druitt, T.H. & Kelfoun, K. 2003 Characterisation of the 1997 Vulcanian explosions of Soufrière Hills Volcano, Montserrat, by video analysis. Bull. Volcanol. 65, 587605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, D.L. 2018 Heterogeneous/particle-laden blast waves. Shock Waves 28, 439449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, P., Xue, K. & Bai, C. 2021 Explosively driven dynamic compaction of granular media. Phys. Fluids 33, 023309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inoue, T., Yamazaki, R. & Inutsuka, S.-I. 2009 Turbulence and magnetic field amplification in supernova remnants: interactions between a strong shock wave and multiphase interstellar medium. Astrophys. J 695, 825833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kandan, K., Khaderi, S.N., Wadley, H.N.G. & Deshpande, V.S. 2017 Surface instabilities in shock loaded granular media. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 109, 217240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koneru, R.B., Rollin, B., Durant, B., Ouellet, F. & Balachandar, S. 2020 A numerical study of particle jetting in a dense particle bed driven by an air-blast. Phys. Fluids 32, 093301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruggel-Emden, H., Sturm, M., Wirtz, S. & Scherer, V. 2008 Selection of an appropriate time integration scheme for the discrete element method (DEM). Comput. Chem. Engng 32, 22632279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, J., Ding, J., Si, T. & Luo, X. 2020 Convergent Richtmyer–Meshkov instability of light gas layer with perturbed outer surface. J. Fluid Mech. 884, R2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, X.D., Osher, S. & Chan, T. 1994 Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 115, 200212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, X., Li, M., Ding, J., Zhai, Z. & Si, T. 2019 Nonlinear behaviour of convergent Richtmyer–Meshkov instability. J. Fluid Mech. 877, 130141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFarland, J.A., Black, W.J., Dahal, J. & Morgan, B.E. 2016 Computational study of the shock driven instability of a multiphase particle-gas system. Phys. Fluids 28, 024105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meng, B., Zeng, J., Tian, B., Li, L., He, Z. & Guo, X. 2019 Modeling and verification of the Richtmyer–Meshkov instability linear growth rate of the dense gas-particle flow. Phys. Fluids 31, 074102.Google Scholar
Milne, A., Parrish, C. & Worland, I. 2010 Dynamic fragmentation of blast mitigants. Shock Waves 20, 4151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milne, A.M., Floyd, E., Longbottom, A.W. & Taylor, P. 2014 Dynamic fragmentation of powders in spherical geometry. Shock Waves 24, 501513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mo, H., Lien, F.-S., Zhang, F. & Cronin, D.S. 2018 A numerical framework for the direct simulation of dense particulate flow under explosive dispersal. Shock Waves 28, 559577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mo, H., Lien, F.-S., Zhang, F. & Cronin, D.S. 2019 A mesoscale study on explosively dispersed granular material using direct simulation. J. Appl. Phys. 125, 214302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osnes, A.N., Vartdal, M. & Pettersson Reif, B.A. 2017 Numerical simulation of particle jet formation induced by shock wave acceleration in a Hele-Shaw cell. Shock Waves 28, 451461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez, V., Saurel, R., Jourdan, G. & Houas, L. 2013 Solid-particle jet formation under shock-wave acceleration. Phys. Rev. E 88, 063011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rycroft, C.H. 2009 VORO++: A three-dimensional Voronoi cell library in C++. Chaos 19, 041111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sundaresan, S., Ozel, A. & Kolehmainen, J. 2018 Toward constitutive models for momentum, species, and energy transport in gas–particle flows. Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Engng 9, 6181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tian, B., Zeng, J., Meng, B., Chen, Q., Guo, X. & Xue, K. 2020 Compressible multiphase particle-in-cell method (CMP-PIC) for full pattern flows of gas-particle system. J. Comput. Phys. 418, 109602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toro, E.F. 2009 Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics. The HLL and HLLC Riemann Solvers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ukai, S., Balakrishnan, K. & Menon, S. 2010 On Richtmyer–Meshkov instability in dilute gas-particle mixtures. Phys. Fluids 22, 104103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vorobieff, P., Anderson, M., Conroy, J., White, R., Truman, C.R. & Kumar, S. 2011 Vortex formation in a shock-accelerated gas induced by particle seeding. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 184503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xue, K., Du, K., Shi, X., Gan, Y. & Bai, C. 2018 Dual hierarchical particle jetting of a particle ring undergoing radial explosion. Soft Matter 14, 4422–4431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xue, K., Li, F. & Bai, C. 2013 Explosively driven fragmentation of granular materials. Eur. Phys. J. E 36, 116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xue, K., Shi, X., Zeng, J., Tian, B., Han, P., Li, J., Liu, L., Meng, B., Guo, X. & Bai, C. 2020 Explosion-driven interfacial instabilities of granular media. Phys. Fluids 32, 084104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yan, G., Yu, H.S. & Mcdowell, G. 2009 Simulation of granular material behaviour using DEM. Procedia Earth Planet. Sci. 1, 598605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y., He, Z., Xie, H.S., Xiao, M.J. & Tian, B.L.J.J.o.F.M. 2020 Methodology for determining coefficients of turbulent mixing model. 905, A26.Google Scholar
Zhou, Y. et al. 2021 Rayleigh–Taylor and Richtmyer–Meshkov instabilities: a journey through scales. Physica D 423, 132838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Shock-induced interfacial instabilities of granular media
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Shock-induced interfacial instabilities of granular media
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Shock-induced interfacial instabilities of granular media
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *