Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-kmmxp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-20T19:22:24.666Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Trapping and extreme clustering of finitely dense inertial particles near a rotating vortex pair

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 October 2024

Saumav Kapoor ,
Divya Jaganathan  and
Rama Govindarajan Open the ORCID record for Rama Govindarajan [Opens in a new window]
Saumav Kapoor
Affiliation:
International Centre for Theoretical Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bengaluru 560089, India
Divya Jaganathan
Affiliation:
International Centre for Theoretical Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bengaluru 560089, India
Rama Govindarajan*
Affiliation:
International Centre for Theoretical Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bengaluru 560089, India
*
†Email address for correspondence: rama@icts.res.in
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Small heavy particles cannot be attracted into a region of closed streamlines in a non-accelerating frame (Sapsis & Haller, Chaos, vol. 20, issue 1, 2010, 017515). In a rotating system of vortices, however, particles can get trapped (Angilella, Physica D, vol. 239, issue 18, 2010, pp. 1789–1797) in the vicinity of vortices. We perform numerical simulations to examine trapping of inertial particles in a prototypical rotating flow described by a rotating pair of Lamb–Oseen vortices of identical strength, in the absence of gravity. Our parameter space includes the particle Stokes number $St$, which is a measure of the particle's inertia, and a density parameter $R$, which measures the particle's density relative to the fluid. In particular, we study the regime $0< R<1$ and $0< St<1$, which corresponds to an inertial particle that is finitely denser than the fluid. We show that in this regime, a significant fraction of particles can be trapped indefinitely close to the vortices, and display extreme clustering into objects of smaller dimension: attracting fixed points and limit cycles of different periods including chaotic attractors. As $St$ increases for a given $R$, we may have an incomplete or complete period-doubling route to chaos, as well as an unusual period-halving route back to a fixed point attractor. The fraction of trapped particles can be a non-monotonic function of $St$, and we may even have windows in $St$ for which no particle trapping occurs. At $St$ larger than a critical value, beyond which trapping ceases to exist, significant fractions of particles can spend long but finite times in the vortex vicinity. The inclusion of the Basset–Boussinesq history (BBH) force is imperative in our study due to the finite density of the particle. We observe that the BBH force significantly increases the basin of attraction over which trapping occurs, and also widens the range of $St$ for which trapping can be realised. Extreme clustering can be of significance in a host of physical applications, including planetesimal formation by aggregation of dust in protoplanetary discs, and aggregation of phytoplankton in the ocean. Our findings in the prototypical model provide impetus to conduct experiments and further numerical investigations to understand clustering of inertial particles.

JFM classification

Low-Reynolds-number flows: Stokesian dynamics Multiphase and Particle-laden Flows: Particle/fluid flow Nonlinear Dynamical Systems: Bifurcation
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 996 , 10 October 2024 , A44
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aliseda, A., Cartellier, A., Hainaux, F. & Lasheras, J.C. 2002 Effect of preferential concentration on the settling velocity of heavy particles in homogeneous isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 468, 77–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angilella, J.-R. 2010 Dust trapping in vortex pairs. Physica D 239 (18), 1789–1797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angilella, J.R., Vilela, R.D. & Motter, A.E. 2014 Inertial particle trapping in an open vortical flow. J. Fluid Mech. 744, 183–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bec, J., Biferale, L., Cencini, M., Lanotte, A., Musacchio, S. & Toschi, F. 2007 Heavy particle concentration in turbulence at dissipative and inertial scales. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 084502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bracco, A., Chavanis, P.H., Provenzale, A. & Spiegel, E.A. 1999 Particle aggregation in a turbulent Keplerian flow. Phys. Fluids 11 (8), 2280–2287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cerretelli, C. & Williamson, C.H.K. 2003 The physical mechanism for vortex merging. J. Fluid Mech. 475, 41–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chong, K., Kelly, S.D., Smith, S. & Eldredge, J.D. 2013 Inertial particle trapping in viscous streaming. Phys. Fluids 25 (3), 033602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daitche, A. 2015 On the role of the history force for inertial particles in turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 782, 567–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daitche, A. & Tél, T. 2011 Memory effects are relevant for chaotic advection of inertial particles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 244501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daitche, A. & Tél, T. 2014 Memory effects in chaotic advection of inertial particles. New J. Phys. 16 (7), 073008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druzhinin, O.A. 1995 On the two-way interaction in two-dimensional particle-laden flows: the accumulation of particles and flow modification. J. Fluid Mech. 297, 49–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falkovich, G., Fouxon, A. & Stepanov, M.G. 2002 Acceleration of rain initiation by cloud turbulence. Nature 419 (6903), 151–154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferry, J. & Balachandar, S. 2001 A fast Eulerian method for disperse two-phase flow. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 27 (7), 1199–1226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallay, T. & Wayne, C.E. 2002 Invariant manifolds and the long-time asymptotics of the Navier–Stokes and vorticity equations on $R^2$. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 163, 209–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gatignol, R. 1983 The Fa$\acute{\rm x}$en formulae for a rigid particle in an unsteady non-uniform Stokes flow. J. Méc. Théor. Appl. 2, 143–160.Google Scholar
Gerosa, F.A., Méheut, H. & Bec, J. 2023 Clusters of heavy particles in two-dimensional Keplerian turbulence. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 138, 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grebogi, C., Ott, E. & Yorke, J.A. 1983 Crises, sudden changes in chaotic attractors, and transient chaos. Physica D 7 (1), 181–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guasto, J.S., Rusconi, R. & Stocker, R. 2012 Fluid mechanics of planktonic microorganisms. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 44 (2012), 373–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guseva, K., Feudel, U. & Tél, T. 2013 Influence of the history force on inertial particle advection: gravitational effects and horizontal diffusion. Phys. Rev. E 88, 042909.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haller, G. & Sapsis, T. 2008 Where do inertial particles go in fluid flows? Physica D 237 (5), 573–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaganathan, D., Govindarajan, R. & Vasan, V. 2024 Explicit integrators for nonlocal equations: the case of the Maxey–Riley–Gatignol equation. Quart. Appl. Math. https://doi.org/10.1090/qam/1693 (preprint).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasheras, J.C. & Tio, K.-K. 1994 Dynamics of a small spherical particle in steady two-dimensional vortex flows. Appl. Mech. Rev. 47 (6S), S61–S69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lattanzi, A.M., Tavanashad, V., Subramaniam, S. & Capecelatro, J. 2022 Stochastic model for the hydrodynamic force in Euler–Lagrange simulations of particle-laden flows. Phys. Rev. Fluids 7, 014301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcu, B., Meiburg, E. & Newton, P.K. 1995 Dynamics of heavy particles in a Burgers vortex. Phys. Fluids 7 (2), 400–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, J.S. 1998 A model of heavy particle dispersion by organized vortex structures wrapped around a columnar vortex core. Phys. Fluids 10 (12), 3236–3238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, J.S. 2005 Particle dispersion in a turbulent vortex core. Phys. Fluids 17 (2), 025104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxey, M.R. 1987 The gravitational settling of aerosol particles in homogeneous turbulence and random flow fields. J. Fluid Mech. 174, 441–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxey, M.R., Chang, E.J. & Wang, L.-P. 1996 Interactions of particles and microbubbles with turbulence. Expl Therm. Fluid Sci. 12 (4), 417–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxey, M.R. & Riley, J.J. 1983 Equation of motion for a small rigid sphere in a nonuniform flow. Phys. Fluids 26 (4), 883–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moffatt, H.K., Kida, S. & Ohkitani, K. 1994 Stretched vortices – the sinews of turbulence; large-Reynolds-number asymptotics. J. Fluid Mech. 259, 241–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nath, A.V.S. & Roy, A. 2024 Clustering and chaotic motion of heavy inertial particles in an isolated non-axisymmetric vortex. J. Fluid Mech. (submitted), arXiv:2403.10011.Google Scholar
Nizkaya, T., Angilella, J.R. & Buès, M. 2010 Note on dust trapping in point vortex pairs with unequal strengths. Phys. Fluids 22 (11), 113301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prasath, S.G., Vasan, V. & Govindarajan, R. 2019 Accurate solution method for the Maxey–Riley equation, and the effects of Basset history. J. Fluid Mech. 868, 428–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raju, N. & Meiburg, E. 1997 Dynamics of small, spherical particles in vortical and stagnation point flow fields. Phys. Fluids 9 (2), 299–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramadugu, R., Perlekar, P. & Govindarajan, R. 2022 Surface tension as the destabiliser of a vortical interface. J. Fluid Mech. 936, A45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravichandran, S. & Govindarajan, R. 2015 Caustics and clustering in the vicinity of a vortex. Phys. Fluids 27 (3), 033305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravichandran, S., Perlekar, P. & Govindarajan, R. 2014 Attracting fixed points for heavy particles in the vicinity of a vortex pair. Phys. Fluids 26, 013303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reade, W.C. & Collins, L.R. 2000 Effect of preferential concentration on turbulent collision rates. Phys. Fluids 12 (10), 2530–2540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapsis, T. & Haller, G. 2010 Clustering criterion for inertial particles in two-dimensional time-periodic and three-dimensional steady flows. Chaos 20 (1), 017515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shuai, S., Roy, A. & Kasbaoui, M.H. 2024 The merger of co-rotating vortices in dusty flows. J. Fluid Mech. 981, A27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squires, K.D. & Eaton, J.K. 1991 Preferential concentration of particles by turbulence. Phys. Fluids A: Fluid Dyn. 3 (5), 1169–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanga, P., Babiano, A., Dubrulle, B. & Provenzale, A. 1996 Forming planetesimals in vortices. Icarus 121 (1), 158–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tavanashad, V., Passalacqua, A., Fox, R.O. & Subramaniam, S. 2019 Effect of density ratio on velocity fluctuations in dispersed multiphase flow from simulations of finite-size particles. Acta Mech. 230 (2), 469–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tél, T. 2015 The joy of transient chaos. Chaos 25 (9), 097619.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tio, K.-K., Liñán, A., Lasheras, J.C. & Gañán-Calvo, A.M. 1993 On the dynamics of buoyant and heavy particles in a periodic Stuart vortex flow. J. Fluid Mech. 254, 671–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varaksin, A.Y. & Ryzhkov, S.V. 2022 Vortex flows with particles and droplets (a review). Symmetry 14, 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, L.P. & Maxey, M.R. 1993 Settling velocity and concentration distribution of heavy particles in homogeneous isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 256, 27–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, M., Mehlig, B. & Bezuglyy, V. 2006 Caustic activation of rain showers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 048501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed