Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-gs9qr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-29T10:43:00.573Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Unstart phenomena induced by mass addition and heat release in a model scramjet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 May 2016

S. Im ,
D. Baccarella ,
B. McGann ,
Q. Liu ,
L. Wermer  and
H. Do
S. Im*
Affiliation:
Aerospace Engineering Program, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609, USA
D. Baccarella
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA
B. McGann
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA
Q. Liu
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA
L. Wermer
Affiliation:
Aerospace Engineering Program, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609, USA
H. Do
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
*
†Email address for correspondence: sim@wpi.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The unstart phenomena in a model scramjet with a free stream Mach number of 4.5 were investigated at an arc-heated hypersonic wind tunnel. High-speed schlieren imaging and high resonance frequency pressure measurements were used to capture the flow features during the unstart process. Three unstart conditions were tested: (i) a low-enthalpy free stream with mass loading, (ii) a high-enthalpy free stream with mass loading and (iii) a high-enthalpy free stream with mass loading and heat release. It was revealed that the unstart threshold and the time from the onset to the completion of unstart depended strongly on the mass loading rate and the heat exchange. The negative heat addition (cooling) significantly increased the threshold of mass flow rate triggering unstart. The decrement of the mass flow rate threshold for unstart was observed in the presence of heat release by combustion. The observed transient and quasi-steady behaviours of the unstart shockwave system and the jet motion were similar in all of the test conditions. On the other hand, at the lip of inlet model, the unstart shockwave under the cold free stream condition exhibited a relatively steady behaviour while severe oscillatory flow motions of the jet and the unstart shockwave were observed in the combustion-driven unstart process. The different unstarted flow behaviours between the three flow conditions were explained using a simplified one-dimensional flow choking analysis and use of the Korkegi criterion.

JFM classification

Compressible Flows: Compressible Flows Reacting Flows: Reacting Flows Compressible Flows: Shock waves

Information

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 797 , 25 June 2016 , pp. 604 - 629
Check for updates
Copyright
© 2016 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Baccarella, D., Liu, Q., Passaro, A., Lee, T. & Do, H. 2016 Development and testing of the ACT-1 experimental facility for hypersonic combustion research. Meas. Sci. Technol. 27 (4), 045902.Google Scholar
Curran, E. T., Heiser, W. H. & Pratt, D. T. 1996 Fluid phenomena in scramjet combustion systems. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 28 (1), 323–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Do, H., Im, S., Mungal, M. G. & Cappelli, M. A. 2011a The influence of boundary layers on supersonic inlet flow unstart induced by mass injection. Exp. Fluids 51 (3), 679–691.Google Scholar
Do, H., Im, S., Mungal, M. G. & Cappelli, M. A. 2011b Visualizing supersonic inlet duct unstart using planar laser Rayleigh scattering. Exp. Fluids 50 (6), 1651–1657.Google Scholar
Emami, S., Trexler, C. A., Auslender, A. H. & Weidner, J. P.1995 Experimental investigation of inlet-combustor isolators for a dual-mode scramjet at a Mach number of 4. NASA Technical Paper 3502.Google Scholar
Frost, M. A., Gangurde, D. Y., Paull, A. & Mee, D. J. 2009 Boundary-layer separation due to combustion-induced pressure rise in a supersonic flow. AIAA J. 47 (4), 1050–1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heiser, W. H. & Pratt, D. T.1994 Hypersonic airbreathing propulsion. AIAA Education Series. (AIAA).Google Scholar
Im, S., Do, H. & Cappelli, M. A. 2012 The manipulation of an unstarting supersonic flow by plasma actuator. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 45 (48), 485202.Google Scholar
Kodera, M., Tomioka, S., Kanda, T., Mitani, T. & Kobayashi, K.2003 Mach 6 test of a scramjet engine with boundary-layer bleeding and two-staged fuel injection. AIAA Paper 2003-7049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korkegi, R. H. 1975 Comparison of shock-induced two-and three-dimensional incipient turbulent seperation. AIAA J. 13 (4), 534–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurence, S. J., Karl, S., Schramm, J. M. & Hannemann, K. 2013 Transient fluid-combustion phenomena in a model scramjet. J. Fluid Mech. 722, 85–120.Google Scholar
Laurence, S. J., Lieber, D., Schramm, J. M., Hannemann, K. & Larsson, J. 2015 Incipient thermal choking and stable shock-train formation in the heat-release region of a scramjet combustor. Part I: shock-tunnel experiments. Combust. Flame 162 (4), 921–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Q., Passaro, A., Baccarella, D. & Do, H. 2014 Ethylene flame dynamics and inlet unstart in a model scramjet. J. Propul. Power 30 (6), 1577–1585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mashio, S., Kurashina, K., Bamba, T., Okimoto, S. & Kaji, S.2001 Unstart phenomenon due to thermal choke in scramjet module. AIAA Paper 2001-1887.Google Scholar
McDaniel, K. S. & Edwards, J. R.2001 Three-dimensional simulation of thermal choking in a model scramjet combustor. AIAA Paper 2001-0382.Google Scholar
Norris, G. 2011 X-51A scramjet fails on second attempt. Aerosp. Daily Def. Rep. 238 (55).Google Scholar
O’Byrne, S., Doolan, M., Olsen, S. R. & Houwing, A. F. P. 2000 Analysis of transient thermal choking processes in a model scramjet engine. J. Propul. Power 16 (5), 808–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodi, P. E., Emami, S. & Trexler, C. A. 1996 Unsteady pressure behavior in a ramjet/scramjet inlet. J. Propul. Power 12 (3), 486–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saad, M. A. 1993 Compressible Fluid Flow. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Sato, S., Izumikawa, M., Tomioka, S. & Mitani, T.1997 Scramjet engine test at Mach 6 flight condition. AIAA Paper 1997-3021.Google Scholar
Shimura, T., Mitani, T., Sakuranaka, N. & Izumikawa, M. 1998 Load oscillations caused by unstart of hypersonic wind tunnels and engines. J. Propul. Power 14 (3), 348–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tam, C. J., Eklund, D. & Behdadnia, R.2008 Influence of downstream boundary conditions on scramjet-isolator simulations. AIAA Paper 2008-6929.Google Scholar
Tan, H. J. & Guo, R. W. 2007 Experimental study of the unstable-unstarted condition of a hypersonic inlet at Mach 6. J. Propul. Power 23 (4), 783–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valdivia, A., Yuceil, K. B., Wagner, J. L., Clemens, N. T. & Dolling, D. S. 2014 Control of supersonic inlet-isolator unstart using active and passive vortex generators. AIAA J. 52 (6), 1207–1218.Google Scholar
Wagner, J. L., Yuceil, K. B., Valdivia, A., Clemens, N. T. & Dolling, D. S. 2009 Experimental investigation of unstart in an inlet/isolator model in Mach 5 flow. AIAA J. 47 (6), 1528–1542.Google Scholar
Wang, X. & Le, J. 2000 Computations of inlet/isolator for SCRAMjet engine. J. Therm. Sci. 9 (4), 334–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wieting, A. R.1976 Exploratory study of transient upstart phenomena in a three-dimensional fixed-geometry scramjet engine. NASA Tech. Rep. TN D-8156.Google Scholar

Im et al. supplementary movie

Schlieren movie of Case 5, low enthalpy freestream - cold nitrogen jet, at the jet of a scramjet model. Movie was taken at 10 kHz and shown at 10 Hz.

Download Im et al. supplementary movie(Video)
Video 9.3 MB

Im et al. supplementary movie

Schlieren movie of Case 7, low enthalpy freestream - cold nitrogen jet, at the inlet of a scramjet model. This movie was taken at 10 kHz and shown at 10 Hz.

Download Im et al. supplementary movie(Video)
Video 1.9 MB

Im et al. supplementary movie

Schlieren movie of Case 14, high enthalpy freestream - ethylene jet, at the jet of a scramjet model. Movie was taken at 10 kHz and shown at 10 Hz.

Download Im et al. supplementary movie(Video)
Video 7.6 MB

Im et al. supplementary movie

Schlieren movie of Case 14, high enthalpy freestream - ethylene jet, at the inlet of a scramjet model. Movie was taken at 8 kHz and shown at 10 Hz.

Download Im et al. supplementary movie(Video)
Video 2.5 MB