Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-t4qhp Total loading time: 0.771 Render date: 2022-08-13T06:28:55.449Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

The unsteady three-dimensional wake produced by a trapezoidal pitching panel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 September 2011

Melissa A. Green*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
Clarence W. Rowley
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
Alexander J. Smits
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
*
Email address for correspondence: magreen@lcp.nrl.navy.mil

Abstract

Particle image velocimetry (PIV) is used to investigate the three-dimensional wakes of rigid pitching panels with a trapezoidal geometry, chosen to model idealized fish caudal fins. Experiments are performed for Strouhal numbers from 0.17 to 0.56 for two different trailing edge pitching amplitudes. A Lagrangian coherent structure (LCS) analysis is employed to investigate the formation and evolution of the panel wake. A classic reverse von Kármán vortex street pattern is observed along the mid-span of the near wake, but the vortices realign and exhibit strong interactions near the spanwise edges of the wake. At higher Strouhal numbers, the complexity of the wake increases downstream of the trailing edge as the spanwise vortices spread transversely and lose coherence as the wake splits. This wake transition is shown to correspond to a qualitative change in the LCS pattern surrounding each vortex core, and can be identified as a quantitative event that is not dependent on arbitrary threshold levels. The location of this transition is observed to depend on both the pitching amplitude and free stream velocity, but is not constant for a fixed Strouhal number. On the panel surface, the trapezoidal planform geometry is observed to create additional vortices along the swept edges that retain coherence for low Strouhal numbers or high sweep angles. These additional swept-edge structures are conjectured to add to the complex three-dimensional flow near the tips of the panel.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Present address: Laboratory for Computational Physics and Fluid Dynamics, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375, USA.

References

1. Borazjani, I. & Sotiropoulos, F. 2008 Numerical investigation of the hydrodynamics of anguilliform swimming in the transitional and inertial flow regimes. J. Expl Biol. 212, 576592.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Brunton, S. L. & Rowley, C. W. 2010 Fast computation of finite-time Lyapunov exponent fields for unsteady flows. Chaos 20, 017503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Buchholz, J. H. J. 2006 The flowfield and performance of a low aspect ratio unsteady propulsor. PhD the, Princeton University.Google Scholar
4. Buchholz, J. H. J., Green, M. A. & Smits, A. J. 2011 Circulation of vortices generated by a pitching panel. J. Fluid Mech. (in press).Google Scholar
5. Buchholz, J. H. J. & Smits, A. J. 2008 The wake structure and thrust performance of a rigid low-aspect-ratio pitching panel. J. Fluid Mech. 603, 331365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Chong, M. S., Perry, A. E. & Cantwell, B. J. 1990 A general classification of three-dimensional flow fields. Phys. Fluids A 2 (5), 765777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Clark, R. P. & Smits, A. J. 2006 Thrust production and wake structure of a batoid-inspired oscillating fin. J. Fluid Mech. 562, 415429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Dabiri, J. O. 2009 Optimal vortex formation as a unifying principle in biological propulsion. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 41, 1733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Dong, H., Mittal, R., Bozhurttas, M. & Najjar, F. 2005 Wake structure and performance of finite aspect-ratio flapping foils. In 43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. AIAA.Google Scholar
10. Eldredge, J. D. & Chong, K. 2010 Fluid transport and coherent structures of translating and flapping wings. Chaos 20, 017509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. von Ellenrieder, K. D., Parker, K. & Soria, J. 2003 Flow structures behind a heaving and pitching finite-span wing. J. Fluid Mech. 490, 129138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Ghovardhan, R. & Williamson, C. H. K. 2005 Vortex-induced vibrations of a sphere. J. Fluid Mech. 531, 1147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Green, M. A., Rowley, C. W. & Haller, G. 2007 Detection of Lagrangian coherent structures in three-dimensional turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 572, 111120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Green, M. A., Rowley, C. W. & Smits, A. J. 2010 Using hyperbolic Lagrangian coherent structures to investigate vortices in bioinspired fluid flows. Chaos 20, 017510.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Green, M. A. & Smits, A. J. 2008 Effects of three-dimensionality on thrust production by a pitching panel. J. Fluid Mech. 615, 211220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Guglielmini, L. 2004 Modeling of thrust generating foils. PhD thesis, University of Genoa.Google Scholar
17. Haller, G. 2002 Lagrangian coherent structures from approximate velocity data. Phys. Fluids 14 (6), 18511861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Haller, G. 2005 An objective definition of a vortex. J. Fluid Mech. 525, 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Haller, G. 2010 A variational theory of hyperbolic Lagrangian coherent structures. Physica D (in press).Google Scholar
20. Haller, G. & Yuan, G. 2000 Lagrangian coherent structures and mixing in two dimensional turbulence. Physica D 147, 352370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Huang, H., Dabiri, D. & Gharib, M. 1997 On errors of digital particle image velocimetry. Meas. Sci. Technol. 8, 14271440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Hultmark, M., Leftwich, M. & Smits, A. J. 2007 Flowfield measurements in the wake of a robotic lamprey. Exp. Fluids 43, 683690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Hunt, J. C. R., Wray, A. A. & Moin, P. 1988 Eddies, stream, and convergence zones in turbulent flows. Center for Turbulence Research Rep. CTR-S88.Google Scholar
24. Jeong, J. & Hussein, F. 1995 On the identification of a vortex. J. Fluid Mech. 285, 6994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Jiménez, J. M. 2002 Low reynolds number studies in the wake of a submarine model using particle image velocimetry. Master’s thesis, Princeton University.Google Scholar
26. Koochesfahani, M. M. 1989 Vortical patterns in the wake of an oscillating airfoil. AIAA J. 27 (9), 12001205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Lapeyre, G. 2002 Characterization of finite-time Lyapunov exponents and vectors in two-dimensional turbulence. Chaos 12 (3), 688698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. Lauder, G. V. & Tytell, E. D. 2006 Hydrodynamics of undulatory propulsion. In Fish Biomechanics (ed. Shadwick, R. E. & Lauder, G. V. ). Fish Physiology, vol. 23 . pp. 425468. Academic.Google Scholar
29. Lekien, F. & Leonard, N. 2004 Dynamically consistent Lagrangian coherent structures. In American Inst. of Physics: 8th Experimental Chaos Conference, CP 742, pp. 132–139.Google Scholar
30. Lipinski, D., Cardwell, B. & Mohseni, K. 2008 A Lagrangian analysis of a two-dimensional airfoil with vortex shedding. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 41, 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31. O’Farrell, C. & Dabiri, J. O. 2010 A Lagrangian approach to identifying vortex pinch-off. Chaos 20, 017513.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32. Sarkar, S. & Venkatraman, K. 2006 Numerical simulation of thrust generating flow past a pitching aerofoil. Comput. Fluids 35, 1642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33. Shadden, S. C., Dabiri, J. O. & Marsden, J. E. 2006 Lagrangian analysis of fluid transport in empirical vortex ring flows. Phys. Fluids 18, 047105–1–047105–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34. Shadden, S. C., Lekien, F. & Marsden, J. E. 2005 Definition and properties of Lagrangian coherent structures from finite-time Lyapunov exponents in two-dimensinal aperiodic flows. Physica D 212, 271304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35. Shadden, S. C., Astorino, M. & Gerbeau, J.-F. 2010 Computational analysis of an aortic valve jet with Lagrangian coherent structures. Chaos 20, 017512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36. Shadden, S. C., Katija, K., Rosenfeld, M., Marsden, J. E. & Dabiri, J. O. 2007 Transport and stirring induced by vortex formation. J. Fluid Mech. 593, 315331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37. Shadden, S. C. & Taylor, C. A. 2008 Characterization of coherent structures in the cardiovascular system. Ann. Biomed. Engng 36 (7), 11521162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38. Tang, W., Chan, P. W. & Haller, G. 2010 Accurate extraction of Lagrangian coherent structures over finite domains with application to flight data analysis over Hong Kong International Airport. Chaos 20, 017502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39. Triantafyllou, G., Triantafyllou, M. & Grosenbaugh, M. 1993 Optimal thrust development in oscillating foils with application to fish propulsion. J. Fluids Struct. 7 (2), 205224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40. Tytell, E. D., Borazjani, I., Sotiropoulos, F., Baker, T. V., Anderson, E. J. & Lauder, G. V. 2010 Disentangling the functional roles of morphology and motion in the swimming of fish. Integr. Compar. Biol. 50 (6), 11401154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41. Williamson, C. H. K. & Roshko, A. 1988 Vortex formation in the wake of an oscillating cylinder. J. Fluids Struct. 2, 355381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42. Zhou, J., Adrian, R. J., Balachandar, S. & Kendall, T. M. 1999 Mechanisms for generating coherent packets of hairpin vortices in channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 387, 353396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43. Zhu, Q. & Shoele, K. 2008 Propulsion performance of a skeleton-strengthened fin. J. Expl Biol. 211, 20872100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
115
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The unsteady three-dimensional wake produced by a trapezoidal pitching panel
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The unsteady three-dimensional wake produced by a trapezoidal pitching panel
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The unsteady three-dimensional wake produced by a trapezoidal pitching panel
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *