Skip to main content Accessibility help

Airfoil in a high amplitude oscillating stream

  • C. Strangfeld (a1) (a2), H. Müller-Vahl (a2) (a3), C. N. Nayeri (a2), C. O. Paschereit (a2) and D. Greenblatt (a3)...


A combined theoretical and experimental investigation was carried out with the objective of evaluating theoretical predictions relating to a two-dimensional airfoil subjected to high amplitude harmonic oscillation of the free stream at constant angle of attack. Current theoretical approaches were reviewed and extended for the purposes of quantifying the bound, unsteady vortex sheet strength along the airfoil chord. This resulted in a closed form solution that is valid for arbitrary reduced frequencies and amplitudes. In the experiments, the bound, unsteady vortex strength of a symmetric 18 % thick airfoil at low angles of attack was measured in a dedicated unsteady wind tunnel at maximum reduced frequencies of 0.1 and at velocity oscillations less than or equal to 50 %. With the boundary layer tripped near the leading edge and mid-chord, the phase and amplitude variations of the lift coefficient corresponded reasonably well with the theory. Near the maximum lift coefficient overshoot, the data exhibited an additional high-frequency oscillation. Comparisons of the measured and predicted vortex sheet indicated the existence of a recirculation bubble upstream of the trailing edge which sheds into the wake and modifies the Kutta condition. Without boundary layer tripping, a mid-chord bubble is present that strengthens during flow deceleration and its shedding produces a dramatically different effect. Instead of a lift coefficient overshoot, as per the theory, the data exhibit a significant undershoot. This undershoot is also accompanied by high-frequency oscillations that are characterized by the bubble shedding. In summary, the location of bubble and its subsequent shedding play decisive roles in the resulting temporal aerodynamic loads.


Corresponding author

Email address for correspondence:


Hide All
Amiet, R. K. 1990 Gust response for flat-plate airfoils and the kutta condition. AIAA J. 28 (10), 17181727.
Anderson, J. D. 2011 Fundamentals of Aerodynamics. McGraw-Hill Education.
Barlas, T. K. & Van Kuik, G. 2010 Review of state of the art in smart rotor control research for wind turbines. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 46 (1), 127.
Basu, B. C. & Hancock, G. J. 1978 The unsteady motion of a two-dimensional aerofoil in incompressible inviscid flow. J. Fluid Mech. 87 (01), 159178.
Birnbaum, W. 1923 Die tragende Wirbelfläche als Hilfsmittel zur Behandlung des ebenen Problems der Tragflügeltheorie. Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 3 (4), 290297.
Boutilier, M. S. H. & Yarusevych, S. 2012 Parametric study of separation and transition characteristics over an airfoil at low reynolds numbers. Exp. Fluids 52 (6), 14911506.
Bross, M. & Rockwell, D. 2014 Flow structure on a simultaneously pitching and rotating wing. J. Fluid Mech. 756, 354383.
Favier, D., Agnes, A., Barbi, C. & Maresca, C. 1988 Combined translation/pitch motion-a new airfoil dynamic stall simulation. J. Aircraft 25 (9), 805814.
Favier, D., Rebont, J. & Maresca, C. 1979 Large-amplitude fluctuations of velocity and incidence of an oscillating airfoil. AIAA J. 17 (11), 12651267.
Gompertz, K., Jensen, C., Kumar, P., Peng, D., Gregory, J. W. & Bons, J. P. 2011 Modification of transonic blowdown wind tunnel to produce oscillating freestream Mach number. AIAA J. 49 (11), 25552563.
Goodrich, M. & Gorham, J. 2008 Wind tunnels of the western hemisphere. In Federal Research Division Library of Congress, Washington, DC, pp. 8182.
Granlund, K., Monnier, B., Ol, M. & Williams, D. 2014 Airfoil longitudinal gust response in separated vs. attached flows. Phys. Fluids 26 (2), 114.
Granlund, K. O., Ol, M. V. & Bernal, L. P. 2013 Unsteady pitching flat plates. J. Fluid Mech. 733, R5.
Greenberg, J. M.1947 Airfoil in sinusoidal motion in a pulsating stream. NACA Tech. Rep. TN1326.
Greenblatt, D. 2015 Unsteady low-speed wind tunnel design. In 31st AIAA Aerodynamic Measurement Technonoly & Ground Testing Conference, Dallas, TX.
Greenblatt, D. 2016 Unsteady low-speed wind tunnels. AIAA J. doi:10.2514/1.J054590.
Greenblatt, D., Kiedaisch, J. & Nagib, H. 2001 Unsteady-pressure corrections in highly attenuated measurements at moderate mach numbers. In 31st AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference & Exhibit, Anaheim, CA.
Ham, N. D., Bauer, P. H. & Lawrence, T. L. 1974 Wind tunnel generation of sinusoidal lateral and longitudinal gusts by circulation of twin parallel airfoils. NASA Tech. Rep. 75, 2951.
Harding, S. F., Payne, G. S. & Bryden, I. G. 2014 Generating controllable velocity fluctuations using twin oscillating hydrofoils: experimental validation. J. Fluid Mech. 750, 113123.
Isaacs, R. 1945 Airfoil theory for flows of variable velocity. J. Aeronaut. Sci. 12 (1), 113117.
van Kuik, G. A. M., Micallef, D., Herraez, I., van Zuijlen, A. H. & Ragni, D. 2014 The role of conservative forces in rotor aerodynamics. J. Fluid Mech. 750, 284315.
Leishman, J. G. 2000 Principles of Helicopter Aerodynamics. Cambridge University Press.
Leishman, J. G. 2002 Challenges in modelling the unsteady aerodynamics of wind turbines. In 21st ASME Wind Energy Symposium and the 40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV.
Leishman, J. G. & Bagai, A. 1998 Challenges in understanding the vortex dynamics of helicopter rotor wakes. AIAA J. 36 (7), 11301140.
Motta, V., Guardone, A. & Quaranta, G. 2015 Influence of airfoil thickness on unsteady aerodynamic loads on pitching airfoils. J. Fluid Mech. 774, 460487.
Mueller, T. J. 1989 Low Reynolds number aerodynamics. In Proceedings of the Conference Notre Dame, IN, vol. 54. Springer Science & Business Media.
Müller-Vahl, H., Strangfeld, C., Nayeri, C. N., Paschereit, C. O. & Greenblatt, D. 2015 Control of thick airfoil, deep dynamic stall using steady blowing. AIAA J. 53 (2), 277295.
Ol, M. V. 2007 Vortical structures in high frequency pitch and plunge at low Reynolds number. In 37th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, Miami, FL.
Pierce, G. A., Kunz, D. L. & Malone, J. B. 1978 The effect of varying freestream velocity on airfoil dynamic stall characteristics. J. Am. Helicopter Soc. 23 (2), 2733.
Retelle, J. P., McMichael, J. M. & Kennedy, D. A. 1981 Harmonic optimization of a periodic flow wind tunnel. J. Aircraft 18 (8), 618623.
Somers, D. M.1997 Design and experimental results for the s825 airfoil. Tech. Rep. National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
Strangfeld, C., Müller-Vahl, H., Nayeri, C. N., Paschereit, C. O. & Greenblatt, D. 2014 Airfoil subjected to high-amplitude free-stream oscillations: theory and experiments. In 7th AIAA Theoretical Fluid Mechanics Conference, AIAA Aviation, Atlanta, GA.
Strangfeld, C., Rumsey, C. L., Müller-Vahl, H., Greenblatt, D., Nayeri, C. N. & Paschereit, C. O. 2015 Unsteady thick airfoil aerodynamics: experiments, computation, and theory. In 45th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, Dallas, TX.
Szumowski, A. P. & Meier, G. 1996 Forced oscillations of airfoil flows. Exp. Fluids 21 (6), 457464.
Theodorsen, T.1935 General theory of aerodynamic instability and the mechanism of flutter. NACA Tech. Rep. No. 496 pp. 413–433.
Timmer, W. A. 2008 Two-dimensional low-reynolds number wind tunnel results for airfoil naca 0018. Wind Engng 32 (6), 525537.
Wagner, S., Bareiss, R. & Guidati, G. 1996 Wind Turbine Noise. Springer.
van der Wall, B. G.1992 The influence of variable flow velocity on unsteady airfoil behavior. Tech. Rep. DLR-FB 92-22, Braunschweig, Germany.
van der Wall, B. G. & Leishman, J. G. 1994 On the influence of time-varying flow velocity on unsteady aerodynamics. J. Am. Helicopter Soc. 39 (4), 2536.
MathJax is a JavaScript display engine for mathematics. For more information see

JFM classification

Airfoil in a high amplitude oscillating stream

  • C. Strangfeld (a1) (a2), H. Müller-Vahl (a2) (a3), C. N. Nayeri (a2), C. O. Paschereit (a2) and D. Greenblatt (a3)...


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed