Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T08:16:16.547Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analysis and modelling of unsteady shock train motions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2018

Bing Xiong Open the ORCID record for Bing Xiong [Opens in a new window] ,
Xiao-qiang Fan ,
Zhen-guo Wang  and
Yuan Tao Open the ORCID record for Yuan Tao [Opens in a new window]
Bing Xiong
Affiliation:
Science and Technology on Scramjet Laboratory, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, 410073, PR China
Xiao-qiang Fan*
Affiliation:
Science and Technology on Scramjet Laboratory, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, 410073, PR China
Zhen-guo Wang
Affiliation:
Science and Technology on Scramjet Laboratory, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, 410073, PR China
Yuan Tao
Affiliation:
Science and Technology on Scramjet Laboratory, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, 410073, PR China
*
†Email address for correspondence: xiaoqiangfan@hotmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The characteristics and mechanism for unsteady shock train motions were experimentally studied in a constant-area rectangular duct. High-speed Schlieren techniques and high-frequency pressure measurements were utilized in this research. The results show that the shock train undergoes periodical motions in response to downstream periodical excitations. The mechanism for unsteady shock train motions is that the shock train keeps changing its moving speed to change the relative Mach number ahead of shock train to match the varying back-pressure condition. It can be found that the unsteady shock train motion can be predicted well with a theoretical model, which is based on this mechanism. A correlation between the amplitude of shock train motions and some flow parameters was illustrated using an analytical equation, which was confirmed by the experimental results.

JFM classification

Compressible Flows: Gas dynamics Aerodynamics: High-speed flow Compressible Flows: Shock waves
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 846 , 10 July 2018 , pp. 240 - 262
Check for updates
Copyright
© 2018 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bruce, P. J. K. & Babinsky, H. 2008 Unsteady shock wave dynamics. J. Fluid Mech. 603, 463–473.Google Scholar
Bur, R., Benay, R. & Galli, A. 2006 Experimental and numerical study of forced shock-wave oscillations in a transonic channel. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 10 (1), 265–278.Google Scholar
Culick, F. E. C. & Rogers, T. 1983 The response of normal shocks in diffusers. AIAA J. 21 (1), 1382–1390.Google Scholar
Gnani, F., Zare-Behtash, H. & Kontis, K. 2016 Pseudo-shock waves and their interactions in high-speed intakes. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 1, 1–21.Google Scholar
Hu, J., Chang, J. T., Qin, B. & Wang, L. 2013 Scramjet isolator shock-train leading-edge position modeling based on equilibrium manifold. J. Aerosp. Eng. 64 (4), 1–8.Google Scholar
Hutzel, J. R., Decker, D. D., Cobb, R. G., King, P. I. & Veth, M. J.2011 Scramjet isolator shock train location techniques. AIAA Paper 2011-402.Google Scholar
Jong, Y. O., Fuhua, M. & ShihYang, H. 2005 Interactions between shock and acoustic waves in a supersonic inlet diffuser. J. Propul. Power 21 (3), 486–495.Google Scholar
Klomparens, R. L., Driscoll, J. F. & Gamba, M.2015 Unsteadiness characteristics and pressure distribution of an oblique shock train. AIAA Paper 2015-1519.Google Scholar
Klomparens, R. L., Driscoll, J. F. & Gamba, M.2016 Response of a shock train to downstream back pressure forcing. AIAA Paper 2016-0078.Google Scholar
Lanurence, S. J., Schramm, J. M. & Hannemann, K. 2013 Transient fluid-combustion phenomena in a model scramjet. J. Fluid Mech. 722, 85–120.Google Scholar
Le, D. B., Goyne, C. P. & Krauss, R. H. 2008 Shock train leading-edge detection in a dual-mode scramjet. J. Propul. Power 24 (5), 1035–1041.Google Scholar
Matsuo, K., Miyazato, Y. & Kim, H. D. 1999 Shock train and pseudo-shock phenomena in internal gas flows. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 35, 33–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, B., Duraisamy, K. & Lele, S. K. 2014 Large-eddy simulations of a normal shock train in a constant-area isolator. AIAA J. 52 (3), 539–558.Google Scholar
Su, W. Y., Ji, Y. X. & Chen, Y. 2016 Effects of dynamic backpressure on pseudoshock oscillations in scramjet inlet-isolator. J. Propul. Power 32 (2), 1–13.Google Scholar
Sugiyama, H., Tsujiguchi, Y. & Honma, T.2008 Structure and oscillation phenomena of pseudo-shock waves in a straight square duct at Mach 2 and 4. AIAA Paper 2008-2646.Google Scholar
Sullins, G.1992 Experimental results of shock trains in rectangular ducts. AIAA Paper 1992-5103.Google Scholar
Waltrup, P. J. & Billig, F. S. 1973 Structure of shock waves in cylindrical ducts. AIAA J. 11 (10), 1404–1408.Google Scholar
Weiss, A., Grzona, A. & Oliver, H. 2010 Behavior of shock trains in a diverging duct. Exp. Fluids 49 (1), 355–365.Google Scholar