Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Coins falling in water

  • Luke Heisinger (a1), Paul Newton (a1) and Eva Kanso (a1)
  • Please note a correction has been issued for this article.

Abstract

When a coin falls in water, its trajectory is one of four types, determined by its dimensionless moment of inertia $I^\ast $ and Reynolds number $\text {Re}$ : (A) steady; (B) fluttering; (C) chaotic; or (D) tumbling. The dynamics induced by the interaction of the water with the surface of the coin, however, makes the exact landing site difficult to predict a priori. Here, we describe a carefully designed experiment in which a coin is dropped repeatedly in water to determine the probability density functions (p.d.f.s) associated with the landing positions for each of the four trajectory types, all of which are radially symmetric about the centre drop-line. In the case of the steady mode, the p.d.f. is approximately Gaussian distributed with small variances, indicating that the coin is most likely to land at the centre, right below the point from which it is dropped. For the other falling modes, the centre is one of the least likely landing sites. Indeed, the p.d.f.s of the fluttering, chaotic and tumbling modes are characterized by a ‘dip’ around the centre. In the tumbling mode, the p.d.f. is a ring configuration about the centreline whereas in the chaotic mode, the p.d.f. is generally a broadband distribution spread out radially symmetrically about the centreline. For the steady and fluttering modes, the coin never flips, so the coin lands with the same side up as when it was dropped. The probability of heads or tails is close to 0.5 for the chaotic mode and, in the case of the tumbling mode, the probability of heads or tails is based on the height of the drop which determines whether the coin flips an even or odd number of times during descent.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Email address for correspondence: kanso@usc.edu

Footnotes

Hide All

The original version of this article was published with the incorrect order of authors. A notice detailing this has been published and the error rectified in the online and print PDF and HTML copies.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Alben, S. 2010 Flexible sheets falling in an inviscid fluid. Phys. Fluids 22, 061901.
Andersen, A., Pesavento, U. & Wang, Z. J. 2005a Unsteady aerodynamics of fluttering and tumbling plates. J. Fluid Mech. 541, 6590.
Andersen, A., Pesavento, U. & Wang, Z. J. 2005b Analysis of transitions between fluttering, tumbling and steady descent of falling cards. J. Fluid Mech. 541, 91104.
Auguste, F., Magnaudet, J. & Fabre, D. 2013 Falling styles of disks. J. Fluid Mech. 719, 388405.
Belmonte, A., Eisenberg, H. & Moses, E. 1998 From flutter to tumble: inertial drag and Froude similarity in falling paper. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 345348.
Diaconis, P., Holmes, S. & Montgomery, R. 2007 Dynamical bias in the coin toss. SIAM Rev. 49, 211235.
Dupleich, P. 1941 Rotation in free fall of rectangular wings of elongated shape. NACA Tech. Mem. 1201, 199.
Ern, P., Risso, F., Fabre, D. & Magnaudet, J. 2012 Wake-induced oscillatory paths of bodies freely rising or falling in fluids. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 44, 97121.
Field, S. B., Klaus, M., Moore, M. G. & Nori, F. 1997 Chaotic dynamics of falling disks. Nature 388, 252254.
Hopf, E. 1934 On causality, statistics and probability. J. Math. Phys. 13, 51102.
Howe, H. F. & Smallwood, J. 1982 Ecology of seed dispersal,. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 3, 201228.
Jones, M. A. 2003 The separated flow of an inviscid fluid around a moving flat plate. J. Fluid Mech. 496, 405441.
Jones, M. A. & Shelley, M. J. 2005 Falling cards. J. Fluid Mech. 540, 393425.
Keller, J. B. 1986 The probability of heads. Am. Math. Mon. 93, 191197.
Mahadevan, L. 1996 Tumbling of a falling card. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris II 323, 729736.
Mahadevan, L., Ryu, W. S. & Samuel, A. D. T. 1999 Tumbling cards. Phys. Fluids 11 (1), 13.
Maxwell, J. C. 1854 On a particular case of the descent of a heavy body in a resisting medium. Camb. Dublin Math. J. 9, 145148.
Michelin, S. & Smith, S. G. L. 2009 An unsteady point vortex method for coupled fluid-solid problems. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 23, 127153.
Mittal, R., Seshadri, V. & Udaykumar, H. S. 2004 Flutter, tumble, and vortex induced autorotation. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 17, 165170.
Nathan, R. & Muller-Landau, H. C. 2000 Spatial patterns of seed dispersal, their determinants and consequences for recruitment. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15 (7), 278285.
Paoletti, P. & Mahadevan, L. 2011 Planar controlled gliding, tumbling and descent. J. Fluid Mech. 689, 489516.
Pesavento, U. & Wang, Z. J. 2004 Falling paper: Navier–Stokes solutions, model of fluid forces, and center of mass elevation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (14), 144501.
Poincaré, H.(Ed.) 1912 Calcul des probabilités. Gauthier-Villars.
Smith, H. E. 1971 Autorotating wings: an experimental investigation. J. Fluid Mech. 50, 513534.
Tam, D., Bush, J. W. M., Robitaille, M. & Kudrolli, A. 2010 Tumbling Dynamics of Passive Flexible Wings. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 (18), 184504.
Tanabe, Y. & Kaneko, K. 1994 Behavior of a falling paper. Phys. Rev. Lett. 73 (10), 13721375.
Willmarth, W. W., Hawk, N. E. & Harvey, R. L. 1964 Steady and unsteady motions and wakes of freely falling disks. Phys. Fluids 7 (2), 197208.
Yong, E. H. & Mahadevan, L. 2011 Probability, geometry and dynamics in the toss of a thick coin. Am. J. Phys. 79 (12), 11951201.
Zheng, L. & Jing, W.2006 Application of predictive guidance to re-entry vehicles. 1st International Symposium on Systems Control in Aerospace and Astronautics (ISSCAA 2006) 659663.
MathJax
MathJax is a JavaScript display engine for mathematics. For more information see http://www.mathjax.org.

JFM classification

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed

A correction has been issued for this article: