Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T13:14:11.566Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cyclic steps and roll waves in shallow water flow over an erodible bed

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2012

N. J. Balmforth
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC Canada V6T 1Z2 Earth and Ocean Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC Canada V6T 1Z4
A. Vakil*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC Canada V6T 1Z2
*
Email address for correspondence: ali.vakil@gmail.com

Abstract

The St Venant equations in conjunction with a phenomenological law for erosion are used to explore the nonlinear dynamics of cyclic steps – linearly unstable bedform patterns which emerge when uniform flow over an erodible bed becomes supercritical. The instability saturates by blocking the overlying flow and creating hydraulic jumps just downstream of the steepest part of the steps. Near onset, steadily migrating, nonlinear step patterns are constructed and shown to suffer a short-wavelength secondary instability that ‘roughens’ the bed and renders the staircase patterns less regular and time-dependent. An eddy viscosity is needed to regularize both the onset of the primary steps and the secondary instabilities. Further beyond the critical Froude number, the steps block the flow sufficiently to arrest erosion significantly, creating complicated patterns mixing migrating steps and stationary bedforms. The reduction in flux also stabilizes roll waves – a second, hydrodynamic instability of uniform supercritical flow. It is further shown that roll waves are purely convective instabilities, whereas cyclic steps can be absolute. Thus, in the finite geometries of the laboratory or field, it may be difficult to excite roll waves. On the other hand, the complicated spatiotemporal patterns associated with the cyclic-step instability should develop naturally. The complicated patterns resulting from the secondary instability do not appear to have been observed experimentally, calling into question the validity of the model.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Balmforth, N. J. 1995 Solitary waves and homoclinic orbits. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 27, 335373.Google Scholar
2. Balmforth, N. J. & Mandre, S. 2004 Dynamics of roll waves. J. Fluid Mech. 514, 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Briggs, R. J. 1964 Electron-Stream Interaction with Plasmas. MIT.Google Scholar
4. Colombini, M. & Stocchino, A. 2005 Coupling or decoupling bed and flow dynamics: fast and slow sediment waves at high Froude number. Phys. Fluids 17, 036602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Colombini, M. & Stocchino, A. 2008 Finite-amplitude river dunes. J. Fluid Mech. 611, 283306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Cornish, V. 1910 Ocean Waves and Kindred Geophysical Phenomena. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
7. Fagherazzi, S. & Sun, T. 2003 Numerical simulations of transportional cyclic steps. Comput. Geosci. 29, 11431154.Google Scholar
8. Jeffreys, H. 1925 The flow of water in an inclined channel of rectangular bottom. Phil. Mag. 49, 793.Google Scholar
9. Kostic, S., Sequeiros, O., Spinewine, B. & Parker, G. 2010 Cyclic steps: a phenomenon of supercritical shallow flow from the high mountains to the bottom of the ocean. J. Hydro-environ. Res. 3, 167172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Koyama, T. & Ikeda, H. 1998 Effect of riverbed gradient on bedrock channel configuration: a flume experiment. Proc. Environ. Res. Centre Tsukuba Univ. Japan 23, 2534.Google Scholar
11. Kranenburg, C. 1992 On the evolution of roll waves. J. Fluid Mech. 245, 249261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Needham, D. J. & Merkin, J. H. 1984 On roll waves down an open inclined channel. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 394, 259278.Google Scholar
13. Parker, G. 2008 Cyclic step formation: a phenomenon of supercritical shallow flow from the high mountains to the bottom of the ocean. In Second Intl. Symp. Shallow Flow. Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.Google Scholar
14. Parker, G. & Izumi, N. 2000 Purely erosional cyclic and solitary steps created by flow over a cohesive bed. J. Fluid Mech. 419, 203238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Petzold, L. R. 1983 A description of DASSL – a differential algebraic solver. In Scientific Computing (ed. Stepleman, R. S. ), pp. 6568. North-Holland.Google Scholar
16. Sun, T. & Parker, G. 2005 Transportational cyclic steps created by flow over an erodible bed. Part 2. Theory and numerical simulation. J. Hydraul. Res. 43, 502514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Taki, K. & Parker, G. 2005 Transportational cyclic steps created by flow over an erodible bed. Part 1. Experiments. J. Hydraul. Res. 43, 488501.Google Scholar
18. Winterwerp, J. C., Bakker, W. T., Masbergen, D. R. & Van Rossum, H. 1992 Hyperconcentrated sand–water mixture flows over erodible bed. J. Hydraul. Engng ASCE 119, 15081525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Yu, J. & Kevorkian, J. 1992 Nonlinear evolution of small disturbances into roll waves in an inclined open channel. J. Fluid Mech. 243, 575594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar