Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T11:49:41.732Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The difference between monopole vortices in planetary flows and laboratory experiments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

J. Nycander
Affiliation:
Permanent address: Department of Technology, Uppsala University, PO Box 534, 751 21 Uppsala, Sweden.

Abstract

This work is an attempt to explain observations of vortices in experiments with shallow water in rotating paraboloidal vessels. The most long-lived vortices are invariably anticyclones, while cyclones quickly disperse, and they are larger than the Rossby radius. These experiments are designed to simulate geophysical flows, where large, long-lived, anticyclonic vortices are common.

The general condition for vortices to be steady is that they propagate faster than linear Rossby waves, so that the vortex energy is not dispersed by coupling to linear waves. The propagation velocity is determined by a general integral relation that gives the velocity of the centre of mass. In geophysical flows, to lowest order in the Rossby number, the difference between the centre-of-mass velocity and the maximum phase velocity of the Rossby waves is proportional to the relative perturbation of the fluid depth. Since for anticyclones the difference is positive they may be steady, whereas cyclones cannot be.

In the laboratory experiments this velocity difference is absent because of the latitudinal dependence of the effective gravity caused by the centrifugal force. However, to the next order in the Rossby number, there is another nonlinear contribution, so that anticyclones (but not cyclones) still propagate faster than the linear Rossby waves, and may thus be steady. The velocity difference is smaller than for geophysical flows, and vanishes in the limit of small Rossby number. The existence conditions also show that we can expect the experimental vortices to be smaller (as measured by the Rossby radius) than the planetary vortices. The theory does not apply to vortices that are much smaller than the Rossby radius.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1993 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cushman-Roisin, B., Chassignet, E. P. & Tang, B. 1990 Westward motion of mesoscale eddies. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 20, 758768.Google Scholar
Dolzhanskii, F. V., Krymov, V. A. & Manin, D. Yu. 1990 Stability and vortex structures of quasi-two-dimensional shear flows. Usp. Fiz. Nauk 160, 147 (trans. Sov. Phys. Usp. 33, 495–520.)Google Scholar
Flierl, G. R. 1987 Isolated eddy models in geophysics. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 19, 493530.Google Scholar
Kloosterziel, R. C. & Heust, G. J. F. van 1991 An experimental study of unstable barotropic vortices in a rotating fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 223, 124.Google Scholar
Matsuura, T. & Yamagata, T. 1982 On the evolution of nonlinear planetary eddies larger than the radius of deformation. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 12, 440456.Google Scholar
McWilliams, J. C. 1985 Submesoscale, coherent vortices in the ocean. Rev. Geophys. 23, 165182.Google Scholar
Nezlin, M. V. 1986 Rossby solitons. Sov. Phys. Usp. 29, 807842.Google Scholar
Nezlin, M. V., Rylov, A. Yu, Trubnikov, A. S. & Khutoretskii, A. V. 1990 Cyclonic-anticyclonic asymmetry and a new soliton concept for Rossby vortices in the laboratory, oceans and the atmospheres of giant planets. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 52, 211247.Google Scholar
Nezlin, M. V. & Sutyrin, G. G. 1993 Problems of simulation of large, long-lived monopolar Rossby vortices. Surveys Geophys. (in press).Google Scholar
Nycander, J. 1989 The existence of stationary vortex solutions of the equations for nonlinear drift waves in plasmas and nonlinear Rossby waves. Phys. Fluids B 1, 17881796.Google Scholar
Nycander, J. 1990 Existence criteria and velocity of stationary vortices in plasmas and in shallow water on a rotating planet. In Nonlinear World, IV Intl. Workshop on Non-linear and Turbulent Processes in Physics, Kiev, 1989, pp. 933954. World Scientific.
Nycander, J. 1991 Stationary drift vortices with large amplitude. Phys. Fluids B 3, 931936.Google Scholar
Nycander, J. & Pavlenko, V. P. 1991 Stationary propagating magnetic electron vortices. Phys. Fluids B 3, 13861391.Google Scholar
Nycander, J. & Sutyrin, G. G. 1992 Stationary translating anticyclones on the beta-plane. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans 16, 472498.Google Scholar
Pedlosky, J. 1987 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, 2nd edn. Springer.
Smith, B. A., Soderblom, L. A., Banfield, C., et al. 1989 Voyager 2 at Neptune: Imaging science results. Science 246, 14221449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, B. A., Soderblom, L. A., Batson, R., et al. 1982 A new look at the Saturn system: the Voyager-2 images. Science 215, 504537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, B. A., Soderblom, L. A., Johnson, T. V., et al. 1979 The Jupiter system through the eyes of Voyager-1. Science 204, 951972.Google Scholar
Spiegel, M. R. 1968 Mathematical Handbook. McGraw-Hill.
Takematsu, M. & Kita, T. 1988 The behaviour of isolated free eddies in a rotating fluid: Laboratory experiment. Fluid Dyn. Res. 3, 400406.Google Scholar