Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T07:16:33.764Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A direct numerical investigation of two-way interactions in a particle-laden turbulent channel flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Cheng Peng ,
Orlando M. Ayala  and
Lian-Ping Wang Open the ORCID record for Lian-Ping Wang [Opens in a new window]
Cheng Peng
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanics and Aerospace Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, Guangdong, China Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA
Orlando M. Ayala
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering Technology, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23529, USA
Lian-Ping Wang*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanics and Aerospace Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, Guangdong, China Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA
*
†Email address for correspondence: lwang@udel.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Understanding the two-way interactions between finite-size solid particles and a wall-bounded turbulent flow is crucial in a variety of natural and engineering applications. Previous experimental measurements and particle-resolved direct numerical simulations revealed some interesting phenomena related to particle distribution and turbulence modulation, but their in-depth analyses are largely missing. In this study, turbulent channel flows laden with neutrally buoyant finite-size spherical particles are simulated using the lattice Boltzmann method. Two particle sizes are considered, with diameters equal to 14.45 and 28.9 wall units. To understand the roles played by the particle rotation, two additional simulations with the same particle sizes but no particle rotation are also presented for comparison. Particles of both sizes are found to form clusters. Under the Stokes lubrication corrections, small particles are found to have a stronger preference to form clusters, and their clusters orientate more in the streamwise direction. As a result, small particles reduce the mean flow velocity less than large particles. Particles are also found to result in a more homogeneous distribution of turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) in the wall-normal direction, as well as a more isotropic distribution of TKE among different spatial directions. To understand these turbulence modulation phenomena, we analyse in detail the total and component-wise volume-averaged budget equations of TKE with the simulation data. This budget analysis reveals several mechanisms through which the particles modulate local and global TKE in the particle-laden turbulent channel flow.

JFM classification

Multiphase and Particle-laden Flows: Particle/fluid flow Turbulent Flows: Turbulence simulation Multiphase and Particle-laden Flows: Multiphase flow
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 875 , 25 September 2019 , pp. 1096 - 1144
Copyright
© 2019 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balachandar, S. & Eaton, J. K. 2010 Turbulent dispersed multiphase flow. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 42, 111–133.Google Scholar
Botto, L. & Prosperetti, A. 2012 A fully resolved numerical simulation of turbulent flow past one or several spherical particles. Phys. Fluids 24 (1), 013303.Google Scholar
Bouzidi, M., Firdaouss, M. & Lallemand, P. 2001 Momentum transfer of a Boltzmann-lattice fluid with boundaries. Phys. Fluids 13 (11), 3452–3459.Google Scholar
Brady, J. F. & Bossis, G. 1988 Stokesian dynamics. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 20 (1), 111–157.Google Scholar
Brändle de Motta, J. C., Breugem, W.-P., Gazanion, B., Estivalezes, J.-L., Vincent, S. & Climent, E. 2013 Numerical modelling of finite-size particle collisions in a viscous fluid. Phys. Fluids 25 (8), 083302.Google Scholar
Brändle de Motta, J. C., Costa, P., Derksen, J. J., Peng, C., Wang, L.-P., Breugem, W.-P., Estivalezes, J. L., Vincent, S., Climent, E., Fede, P. et al. 2019 Assessment of numerical methods for fully resolved simulations of particle-laden turbulent flows. Comput. Fluids 179, 1–14.Google Scholar
Brändle de Motta, J. C., Estivalezes, J.-L., Climent, E. & Vincent, S. 2016 Local dissipation properties and collision dynamics in a sustained homogeneous turbulent suspension composed of finite size particles. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 85, 369–379.Google Scholar
Breugem, W.-P. 2010 A combined soft-sphere collision/immersed boundary method for resolved simulations of particulate flows. In ASME 2010 3rd Joint US-European Fluids Engineering Summer Meeting Collocated with 8th International Conference on Nanochannels, Microchannels, and Minichannels, pp. 2381–2392. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.Google Scholar
Burton, T. M. & Eaton, J. K. 2005 Fully resolved simulations of particle-turbulence interaction. J. Fluid Mech. 545, 67–111.Google Scholar
Caiazzo, A. 2008 Analysis of lattice Boltzmann nodes initialisation in moving boundary problems. Intl J. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 8 (1–4), 3–10.Google Scholar
du Cluzeau, A., Bois, G. & Toutant, A. 2019 Analysis and modelling of Reynolds stresses in turbulent bubbly up-flows from direct numerical simulations. J. Fluid Mech. 866, 132–168.Google Scholar
Costa, P., Picano, F., Brandt, L. & Breugem, W.-P. 2016 Universal scaling laws for dense particle suspensions in turbulent wall-bounded flows. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (13), 134501.Google Scholar
Crowe, C. T., Schwarzkopf, J. D., Sommerfeld, M. & Tsuji, Y. 2011 Multiphase Flows With Droplets and Particles. CRC Press.Google Scholar
Eaton, J. K. 2009 Two-way coupled turbulence simulations of gas-particle flows using point-particle tracking. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 35 (9), 792–800.Google Scholar
Elghobashi, S. & Truesdell, G. C. 1993 On the two-way interaction between homogeneous turbulence and dispersed solid particles. I. Turbulence modification. Phys. Fluids 5 (7), 1790–1801.Google Scholar
Eshghinejadfard, A., Abdelsamie, A., Hosseini, S. A. & Thévenin, D. 2017 Immersed boundary lattice Boltzmann simulation of turbulent channel flows in the presence of spherical particles. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 96, 161–172.Google Scholar
Feng, Z.-G. & Michaelides, E. E. 2005 Proteus: a direct forcing method in the simulations of particulate flows. J. Comput. Phys. 202 (1), 20–51.Google Scholar
Feng, Z.-G. & Michaelides, E. E. 2009 Robust treatment of no-slip boundary condition and velocity updating for the lattice-Boltzmann simulation of particulate flows. Comput. Fluids 38 (2), 370–381.Google Scholar
Ferrante, A. & Elghobashi, S. 2003 On the physical mechanisms of two-way coupling in particle-laden isotropic turbulence. Phys. Fluids 15 (2), 315–329.Google Scholar
Gao, H., Li, H. & Wang, L.-P. 2013 Lattice Boltzmann simulation of turbulent flow laden with finite-size particles. Comput. Maths. Applics. 65 (2), 194–210.Google Scholar
Glowinski, R., Pan, T.-W., Hesla, T. I. & Joseph, D. D. 1999 A distributed lagrange multiplier/fictitious domain method for particulate flows. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 25 (5), 755–794.Google Scholar
Gore, R. A. & Crowe, C. T. 1989 Effect of particle size on modulating turbulent intensity. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 15 (2), 279–285.Google Scholar
Gupta, A., Clercx, H. J. H. & Toschi, F. 2018 Computational study of radial particle migration and stresslet distributions in particle-laden turbulent pipe flow. Eur. Phys. J. E 41 (3), 34.Google Scholar
Hall, D. 1988 Measurements of the mean force on a particle near a boundary in turbulent flow. J. Fluid Mech. 187, 451–466.Google Scholar
Joseph, G.2003 Collisional dynamics of macroscopic particles in a viscous fluid. PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA.Google Scholar
Kajishima, T., Takiguchi, S., Hamasaki, H. & Miyake, Y. 2001 Turbulence structure of particle-laden flow in a vertical plane channel due to vortex shedding. JSME Intl J. 44 (4), 526–535.Google Scholar
Kataoka, I. & Serizawa, A. 1989 Basic equations of turbulence in gas–liquid two-phase flow. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 15 (5), 843–855.Google Scholar
Kim, J., Moin, P. & Moser, R. D. 1987 Turbulence statistics in fully developed channel flow at low Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 177, 133–166.Google Scholar
Kulick, J. D., Fessler, J. R. & Eaton, J. K. 1994 Particle response and turbulence modification in fully developed channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 277, 109–134.Google Scholar
Kurose, R. & Komori, S. 1999 Drag and lift forces on a rotating sphere in a linear shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 384, 183–206.Google Scholar
Kussin, J. & Sommerfeld, M. 2002 Experimental studies on particle behaviour and turbulence modification in horizontal channel flow with different wall roughness. Exp. Fluids 33 (1), 143–159.Google Scholar
Lammers, P., Beronov, K. N., Volkert, R., Brenner, G. & Durst, F. 2006 Lattice BGK direct numerical simulation of fully developed turbulence in incompressible plane channel flow. Comput. Fluids 35, 1137–1153.Google Scholar
Legendre, D., Zenit, R., Daniel, C. & Guiraud, P. 2006 A note on the modelling of the bouncing of spherical drops or solid spheres on a wall in viscous fluid. Chem. Engng Sci. 61 (11), 3543–3549.Google Scholar
Li, Y., McLaughlin, J. B., Kontomaris, K. & Portela, L. 2001 Numerical simulation of particle-laden turbulent channel flow. Phys. Fluids 13 (10), 2957–2967.Google Scholar
Lucci, F., Ferrante, A. & Elghobashi, S. 2010 Modulation of isotropic turbulence by particles of Taylor length-scale size. J. Fluid Mech. 650, 5–55.Google Scholar
Maxey, M. R. 2017 Simulation methods for particulate flows and concentrated suspensions. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 49, 171–193.Google Scholar
Maxey, M. R. & Riley, J. J. 1983 Equation of motion for a small rigid sphere in a nonuniform flow. Phys. Fluids 26 (4), 883–889.Google Scholar
Mei, R. 1992 An approximate expression for the shear lift force on a spherical particle at finite Reynolds number. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 18 (1), 145–147.Google Scholar
Mollinger, A. M. & Nieuwstadt, F. T. M. 1996 Measurement of the lift force on a particle fixed to the wall in the viscous sublayer of a fully developed turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 316, 285–306.Google Scholar
Pan, Y. & Banerjee, S. 1997 Numerical investigation of the effects of large particles on wall-turbulence. Phys. Fluids 9 (12), 3786–3807.Google Scholar
Paris, A. D.2001 Turbulence attenuation in a particle-laden channel flow. PhD thesis, Stanford University, CA.Google Scholar
Peng, C., Geneva, N., Guo, Z. & Wang, L.-P. 2018 Direct numerical simulation of turbulent pipe flow using the lattice Boltzmann method. J. Comput. Phys. 357, 16–42.Google Scholar
Peng, C., Teng, Y., Hwang, B., Guo, Z. & Wang, L.-P. 2016 Implementation issues and benchmarking of lattice Boltzmann method for moving rigid particle simulations in a viscous flow. Comput. Maths Applics. 72 (2), 349–374.Google Scholar
Peng, C. & Wang, L.-P. 2018 Direct numerical simulations of turbulent pipe flow laden with finite-size neutrally buoyant particles at low flow Reynolds number. Acta Mechanica 230, 517–539.Google Scholar
Picano, F., Breugem, W.-P. & Brandt, L. 2015 Turbulent channel flow of dense suspensions of neutrally buoyant spheres. J. Fluid Mech. 764, 463–487.Google Scholar
Prosperetti, A. & Tryggvason, G. 2009 Computational Methods for Multiphase Flow. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reeks, M. W. 1983 The transport of discrete particles in inhomogeneous turbulence. J. Aero. Sci. 14 (6), 729–739.Google Scholar
Saffman, P. G. T. 1965 The lift on a small sphere in a slow shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 22 (2), 385–400.Google Scholar
Santarelli, C., Roussel, J. & Fröhlich, J. 2016 Budget analysis of the turbulent kinetic energy for bubbly flow in a vertical channel. Chem. Engng Sci. 141, 46–62.Google Scholar
Shao, X., Wu, T. & Yu, Z. 2012 Fully resolved numerical simulation of particle-laden turbulent flow in a horizontal channel at a low Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 693, 319–344.Google Scholar
Squires, K. D. & Eaton, J. K. 1990 Particle response and turbulence modification in isotropic turbulence. Phys. Fluids 2 (7), 1191–1203.Google Scholar
Tanaka, T. & Eaton, J. K. 2008 Classification of turbulence modification by dispersed spheres using a novel dimensionless number. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (11), 114502.Google Scholar
Tanaka, T. & Eaton, J. K. 2010 Sub-Kolmogorov resolution partical image velocimetry measurements of particle-laden forced turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 643, 177–206.Google Scholar
Tao, S., Hu, J. & Guo, Z. 2016 An investigation on momentum exchange methods and refilling algorithms for lattice Boltzmann simulation of particulate flows. Comput. Fluids 133, 1–14.Google Scholar
Ten Cate, A., Derksen, J. J., Portela, L. M. & Van Den Akker, H. E. A. 2004 Fully resolved simulations of colliding monodisperse spheres in forced isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 519, 233–271.Google Scholar
Ten Cate, A., Nieuwstad, C. H., Derksen, J. J. & Van den Akker, H. E. A. 2002 Particle imaging velocimetry experiments and lattice-Boltzmann simulations on a single sphere settling under gravity. Phys. Fluids 14 (11), 4012–4025.Google Scholar
Tenneti, S. & Subramaniam, S. 2014 Particle-resolved direct numerical simulation for gas-solid flow model development. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 46, 199–230.Google Scholar
Uhlmann, M. 2008 Interface-resolved direct numerical simulation of vertical particulate channel flow in the turbulent regime. Phys. Fluids 20 (5), 053305.Google Scholar
Uhlmann, M. & Chouippe, A. 2017 Clustering and preferential concentration of finite-size particles in forced homogeneous-isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 812, 991–1023.Google Scholar
Vreman, A. W. 2015 Turbulence attenuation in particle-laden flow in smooth and rough channels. J. Fluid Mech. 773, 103–136.Google Scholar
Vreman, A. W. 2016 Particle-resolved direct numerical simulation of homogeneous isotropic turbulence modified by small fixed spheres. J. Fluid Mech. 796, 40–85.Google Scholar
Vreman, A. W. & Kuerten, J. G. M. 2018 Turbulent channel flow past a moving array of spheres. J. Fluid Mech. 856, 580–632.Google Scholar
Wang, L.-P., Ardila, O. G. C., Ayala, O., Gao, H. & Peng, C. 2016a Study of local turbulence profiles relative to the particle surface in particle-laden turbulent flows. J. Fluids Engng 138 (4), 041307.Google Scholar
Wang, L.-P., Peng, C., Guo, Z. & Yu, Z. 2016b Flow modulation by finite-size neutrally buoyant particles in a turbulent channel flow. J. Fluids Engng 138 (4), 041306.Google Scholar
Wang, L.-P., Peng, C., Guo, Z. & Yu, Z. 2016c Lattice Boltzmann simulation of particle-laden turbulent channel flow. Comput. Fluids 124, 226–236.Google Scholar
Wen, B., Zhang, C., Tu, Y., Wang, C. & Fang, H. 2014 Galilean invariant fluid–solid interfacial dynamics in lattice Boltzmann simulations. J. Comput. Phys. 266, 161–170.Google Scholar
Wu, T., Shao, X. & Yu, Z. 2011 Fully resolved numerical simulation of turbulent pipe flows laden with large neutrally-buoyant particles. J. Hydrodyn. 23 (1), 21–25.Google Scholar
Xu, Y. & Subramaniam, S. 2010 Effect of particle clusters on carrier flow turbulence: a direct numerical simulation study. Flow, Turbul. Combust. 85 (3), 735–761.Google Scholar
Yang, F.-L. & Hunt, M. L. 2006 Dynamics of particle–particle collisions in a viscous liquid. Phys. Fluids 18 (12), 121506.Google Scholar
Yu, Z., Lin, Z., Shao, X. & Wang, L.-P. 2017 Effects of particle-fluid density ratio on the interactions between the turbulent channel flow and finite-size particles. Phys. Rev. E 96, 033102.Google Scholar
Zeng, L., Balachandar, S., Fischer, P. & Najjar, F. 2008 Interactions of a stationary finite-sized particle with wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 594, 271–305.Google Scholar
Zhao, W. & Yong, W.-A. 2017 Single-node second-order boundary schemes for the lattice Boltzmann method. J. Comput. Phys. 329 (6), 1–15.Google Scholar