Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Drag reduction in numerical two-phase Taylor–Couette turbulence using an Euler–Lagrange approach

  • Vamsi Spandan (a1), Rodolfo Ostilla-Mónico (a1), Roberto Verzicco (a1) (a2) and Detlef Lohse (a1) (a3)
Abstract

Two-phase turbulent Taylor–Couette (TC) flow is simulated using an Euler–Lagrange approach to study the effects of a secondary phase dispersed into a turbulent carrier phase (here bubbles dispersed into water). The dynamics of the carrier phase is computed using direct numerical simulations (DNS) in an Eulerian framework, while the bubbles are tracked in a Lagrangian manner by modelling the effective drag, lift, added mass and buoyancy force acting on them. Two-way coupling is implemented between the dispersed phase and the carrier phase which allows for momentum exchange among both phases and to study the effect of the dispersed phase on the carrier phase dynamics. The radius ratio of the TC setup is fixed to ${\it\eta}=0.833$ , and a maximum inner cylinder Reynolds number of $Re_{i}=8000$ is reached. We vary the Froude number ( $Fr$ ), which is the ratio of the centripetal to the gravitational acceleration of the dispersed phase and study its effect on the net torque required to drive the TC system. For the two-phase TC system, we observe drag reduction, i.e. the torque required to drive the inner cylinder is lower compared with that of the single-phase system. The net drag reduction decreases with increasing Reynolds number $Re_{i}$ , which is consistent with previous experimental findings (Murai et al., J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., vol. 14, 2005, pp. 143–156; Phys. Fluids, vol. 20(3), 2008, 034101). The drag reduction is strongly related to the Froude number: for fixed Reynolds number we observe higher drag reduction when $Fr<1$ than for with $Fr>1$ . This buoyancy effect is more prominent in low $Re_{i}$ systems and decreases with increasing Reynolds number $Re_{i}$ . We trace the drag reduction back to the weakening of the angular momentum carrying Taylor rolls by the rising bubbles. We also investigate how the motion of the dispersed phase depends on $Re_{i}$ and $Fr$ , by studying the individual trajectories and mean dispersion of bubbles in the radial and axial directions. Indeed, the less buoyant bubbles (large $Fr$ ) tend to get trapped by the Taylor rolls, while the more buoyant bubbles (small $Fr$ ) rise through and weaken them.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Email address for correspondence: d.lohse@utwente.nl
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

T. H. van den Berg , D. P. M. van Gils , D. P. Lathrop  & D. Lohse 2007 Bubbly turbulent drag reduction is a boundary layer effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (8), 084501.

T. H. van den Berg , S. Luther , D. P. Lathrop  & D. Lohse 2005 Drag reduction in bubbly Taylor–Couette turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (4), 044501.

J. Capecelatro  & O. Desjardins 2013 An Euler–Lagrange strategy for simulating particle-laden flows. J. Comput. Phys. 238, 131.

S. L. Ceccio 2010 Friction drag reduction of external flows with bubble and gas injection. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 42, 183203.

A. Chouippe , E. Climent , D. Legendre  & C. Gabillet 2014 Numerical simulation of bubble dispersion in turbulent Taylor–Couette flow. Phys. Fluids 26 (4), 043304.

E. Climent , M. Simonnet  & J. Magnaudet 2007 Preferential accumulation of bubbles in Couette–Taylor flow patterns. Phys. Fluids 19 (8), 083301.

S. Dabiri , J. Lu  & G. Tryggvason 2013 Transition between regimes of a vertical channel bubbly upflow due to bubble deformability. Phys. Fluids 25 (10), 102110.

H. Djeridi , C. Gabillet  & J. Y. Billard 2004 Two-phase Couette–Taylor flow: arrangement of the dispersed phase and effects on the flow structures. Phys. Fluids 16 (1), 128139.

G. N. Fokoua , C. Gabillet , A. Aubert  & C. Colin 2015 Effect of bubbles arrangement on the viscous torque in bubbly Taylor–Couette flow. Phys. Fluids 27 (3), 034105.

S. Grossmann , D. Lohse  & C. Sun 2016 High Reynolds number Taylor–Couette turbulence. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 48 (1), 5380.

J. Jiménez 2011 Cascades in wall-bounded turbulence. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 44 (1), 2745.

J. Lu , A. Fernández  & G. Tryggvason 2005 The effect of bubbles on the wall drag in a turbulent channel flow. Phys. Fluids 17 (9), 095102.

J. Lu  & G. Tryggvason 2008 Effect of bubble deformability in turbulent bubbly upflow in a vertical channel. Phys. Fluids 20 (4), 040701.

V. S. L’vov , A. Pomyalov , I. Procaccia  & V. Tiberkevich 2005 Drag reduction by microbubbles in turbulent flows: the limit of minute bubbles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (17), 174502.

J. Magnaudet  & I. Eames 2000 The motion of high-Reynolds-number bubbles in inhomogeneous flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 32 (1), 659708.

I. M. Mazzitelli , D. Lohse  & F. Toschi 2003 The effect of microbubbles on developed turbulence. Phys. Fluids 15 (1), L5L8.

R. Mei  & J. F. Klausner 1992 Unsteady force on a spherical bubble at finite Reynolds number with small fluctuations in the free-stream velocity. Phys. Fluids. 4 (1), 6370.

Y. Murai 2014 Frictional drag reduction by bubble injection. Exp. Fluids 55 (7), 128.

Y. Murai , H. Fukuda , Y. Oishi , Y. Kodama  & F. Yamamoto 2007 Skin friction reduction by large air bubbles in a horizontal channel flow. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 33 (2), 147163.

Y. Murai , H. Oiwa  & Y. Takeda 2008 Frictional drag reduction in bubbly Couette–Taylor flow. Phys. Fluids 20 (3), 034101.

R. Ostilla-Mónico , E. P. van der Poel , R. Verzicco , S. Grossmann  & D. Lohse 2014b Boundary layer dynamics at the transition between the classical and the ultimate regime of Taylor–Couette flow. Phys. Fluids 26 (1), 015114.

M. J. Pang , J. J. Wei  & B. Yu 2014 Numerical study on modulation of microbubbles on turbulence frictional drag in a horizontal channel. Ocean Engng 81, 5868.

H. J. Park , Y. Tasaka , Y. Oishi  & Y. Murai 2015 Drag reduction promoted by repetitive bubble injection in turbulent channel flows. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 75, 1225.

E. P. van der Poel , R. Ostilla-Mónico , J. Donners  & R. Verzicco 2015 A pencil distributed finite difference code for strongly turbulent wall-bounded flows. Comput. Fluids 116, 1016.

Y. Shiomi , H. Kutsuna , K. Akagawa  & M. Ozawa 1993 Two-phase flow in an annulus with a rotating inner cylinder (flow pattern in bubbly flow region). Nucl. Engng Des. 141 (1), 2734.

G. Tryggvason , S. Dabiri , B. Aboulhasanzadeh  & J. Lu 2013 Multiscale considerations in direct numerical simulations of multiphase flows. Phys. Fluids 25 (3), 031302.

R. Verzicco  & P. Orlandi 1996 A finite-difference scheme for three-dimensional incompressible flows in cylindrical coordinates. J. Comput. Phys. 123 (2), 402414.

T. Watamura , Y. Tasaka  & Y. Murai 2013 Intensified and attenuated waves in a microbubble Taylor–Couette flow. Phys. Fluids 25 (5), 054107.

P. K. Yeung  & S. B. Pope 1988 An algorithm for tracking fluid particles in numerical simulations of homogeneous turbulence. J. Comput. Phys. 79 (2), 373416.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Fluid Mechanics
  • ISSN: 0022-1120
  • EISSN: 1469-7645
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-fluid-mechanics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
MathJax

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 6
Total number of PDF views: 137 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 300 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 26th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.