Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-npwhs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T16:28:39.323Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Drag reduction of flexible plates by reconfiguration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2010

FRÉDÉRICK GOSSELIN ,
EMMANUEL de LANGRE  and
BRUNO A. MACHADO-ALMEIDA
FRÉDÉRICK GOSSELIN
Affiliation:
Département de Mécanique, LadHyX-CNRS, École Polytechnique, 91128 Palaiseau, France
EMMANUEL de LANGRE*
Affiliation:
Département de Mécanique, LadHyX-CNRS, École Polytechnique, 91128 Palaiseau, France
BRUNO A. MACHADO-ALMEIDA
Affiliation:
Département de Mécanique, LadHyX-CNRS, École Polytechnique, 91128 Palaiseau, France Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica, Praca Marechal Eduardo Gomes, 50, Vila das Acácias CEP 12.228-900, São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil
*
†Email address for correspondence: delangre@ladhyx.polytechnique.fr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Through an extensive and systematic experimental investigation of two geometries of flexible plates in air, it is shown that a properly defined scaled Cauchy number allows collapsing all drag measurements of the reconfiguration number. In the asymptotic regime of large deformation, it is shown that the Vogel exponents that scale the drag with the flow velocity for different geometries of plates can be predicted with a simple dimensional analysis reasoning. These predicted Vogel exponents are in agreement with previously published models of reconfiguration. The mechanisms responsible for reconfiguration, namely area reduction and streamlining, are studied with the help of a simple model for flexible plates based on an empirical drag formulation. The model predicts well the reconfiguration observed in the experiments and shows that for a rectangular plate, the effect of streamlining is prominent at the onset of reconfiguration, but area reduction dominates in the regime of large deformation. Additionally, the model demonstrates for both geometries of plates that the reconfiguration cannot be described by a single value of the Vogel exponent. The Vogel exponent asymptotically approaches constant values for small and for very large scaled Cauchy numbers, but in between both extremes it varies significantly over a large range of scaled Cauchy number.

Information

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 650 , 10 May 2010 , pp. 319 - 341
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Ahmed, T., Oakley, B. T., Semmens, M. J. & Gulliver, J. S. 1996 Nonlinear deflection of polypropylene hollow fibre membranes in transverse flow. Water Res. 30, 431–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alben, S. 2008 Optimal flexibility of a flapping appendage in an inviscid fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 614, 355–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alben, S., Shelley, M. & Zhang, J. 2002 Drag reduction through self-similar bending of a flexible body. Nature 420, 479–481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alben, S., Shelley, M. & Zhang, J. 2004 How flexibility induces streamlining in a two-dimensional flow. Phys. Fluids 16, 1694–1713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. 2000 An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, P. M., Sterling, M., Spink, J. H., Baker, C. J., Sylvester-Bradley, R., Mooney, S. J., Tams, A. R. & Ennos, A. R. 2004 Understanding and reducing lodging in cereals. Adv. Agron. 84, 217–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bisshopp, K. E. & Drucker, D. C. 1945 Large deflection of cantilever beams. Quart. Appl. Math. 3, 272–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blevins, R. D. 1984 Applied Fluid Dynamics Handbook. Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
Buckingham, E. 1914 On physically similar systems: illustrations of the use of dimensional equations. Phys. Rev. 4 (4), 345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cermak, J. E. & Isyumov, N. 1998 Wind Tunnel Studies of Buildings and Structures. American Society of Civil Engineers.Google Scholar
Chakrabarti, S. 2002 The Theory and Practice of Hydrodynamics and Vibration. World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, C. & Platts, J. 2008 Updating and optimization of a coning rotor concept. J. Solar Energy Engng 130 (3), 031002-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniel, T. L. & Combes, S. A. 2002 Flexible wings and fins: bending by inertial or fluid-dynamic forces? Integ. Comp. Biol. 42 (5), 1044–1049.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Etnier, S. A. & Vogel, S. 2000 Reorientation of daffodil (narcissus: Amaryllidaceae) flowers in wind: drag reduction and torsional flexibility. Am. J. Bot. 87 (1), 29–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fertis, D. G. 1996 Advanced Mechanics of Structures. CRC Press.Google Scholar
Harder, D., Speck, O., Hurd, C. & Speck, T. 2004 Reconfiguration as a prerequisite for survival in highly unstable flow-dominated habitats. J. Plant Growth Regul. 23, 98–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, C. H. M. 2005 Compliant Structures in Nature and Engineering. WIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Langre, E. 2008 Effects of wind on plants. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 40, 141–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudnicki, M., Mitchell, S. J. & Novak, M. D. 2004 Wind tunnel measurements of crown streamlining and drag relationships for three conifer species. Can. J. Forest Res. 34, 666–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schouveiler, L. & Boudaoud, A. 2006 The rolling up of sheets in a steady flow. J. Fluid Mech. 563, 71–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schouveiler, L., Eloy, C. & Le Gal, P. 2005 Flow-induced vibrations of high mass ratio flexible filaments freely hanging in a flow. Phys. Fluids 17 (4), 047104-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanford, B., Ifju, P., Albertani, R. & Shyy, W. 2008 Fixed membrane wings for micro air vehicles: experimental characterization, numerical modelling, and tailoring. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 44 (4), 258–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, G. 1952 Analysis of the swimming of long and narrow animals. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, Math. Phys. Sci. 214 (1117), 158–183.Google Scholar
Vogel, S. 1984 Drag and flexibility in sessile organisms. Am. Zoologist 24 (1), 37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, S. 1989 Drag and reconfiguration of broad leaves in high winds. J. Exper. Bot. 40, 941–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, S. 1996 Life in Moving Fluids, 2nd edn. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Vogel, S. 1998 Cats' Paws and Catapults: Mechanical Worlds of Nature and People. W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Vogel, S. 2009 Leaves in the lowest and highest winds: temperature, force and shape. New Phytol. 183 (1), 13–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vollsinger, S., Mitchell, S. J., Byrne, K. E., Novak, M. D. & Rudnicki, M. 2005 Wind tunnel measurements of crown streamlining and drag relationships for several hardwood species. Can. J. Forest Res. 35, 1238–1249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, L. 2008 Scaling laws for drag of a compliant body in an incompressible viscous flow. J. Fluid Mech. 607, 387–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, L. & Peskin, C. S. 2007 Drag of a flexible fibre in a two-dimensional moving viscous fluid. Comput. Fluids 36 (2), 398–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar