Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-12T15:34:25.262Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of imposed spanwise perturbations on plane mixing-layer structure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

James H. Bell  and
Rabindra D. Mehta
James H. Bell
Affiliation:
Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford University/NASA Ames Research Center, USA Fluid Mechanics Laboratory, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000, USA
Rabindra D. Mehta
Affiliation:
Fluid Mechanics Laboratory, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000, USA Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, JIAA, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The origin and evolution of spatially stationary streamwise vortical structures in plane mixing layers with laminar initial boundary layers were recently examined quantitatively (Bell & Mehta 1992). When both initial boundary layers were made turbulent, such spatially-stationary streamwise structures were not measured which is indicative of the high sensitivity of these structures to initial conditions. In the present study, the effects of four different types of spanwise perturbations at the origin of the mixing layer were investigated. The wavelengths of the imposed perturbations were chosen to be comparable to the initial Kelvin-Helmholtz wavelength. For the first two perturbations, the boundary layers were otherwise left undisturbed. A serration on the splitter plate trailing edge was found to have a relatively small effect on the formation and development of the streamwise structures. The introduction of cylindrical pegs in the high-speed side boundary layer not only generated a regular array of vortex pairs, but also affected the mixing-layer growth rate and turbulence properties in the far-field region. For the other two perturbations, the initial boundary layers were tripped on the splitter plate. An array of vortex generators mounted in the high-speed boundary layer and a corrugated surface attached to the splitter plate trailing edge had essentially the same effects. Both imposed a regular array of relatively strong streamwise vortices in counter-rotating pairs upon the mixing layer. This resulted in large spanwise distortions of the mixing layer mean properties and Reynolds stresses. While the vorticity injection increased the growth rate in the near-field region as expected, the far-field growth rate was reduced by a factor of about two, together with the peak Reynolds stress levels. This result is attributed to the effect of the relatively strong streamwise vorticity in making the spanwise structures more three-dimensional and hence reducing entrainment during the pairing process. The imposed streamwise vorticity did not follow the pattern of increasing spanwise spacing seen in the ‘naturally occurring’ streamwise vorticity. The mean streamwise vorticity decayed with increasing streamwise distance in all cases, albeit at different rates.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 257 , December 1993 , pp. 33 - 63
Copyright
© 1993 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashurst, W. T. & Meiburg, E. 1988 Three-dimensional shear layers via vortex dynamics. J. Fluid Mech. 189, 87–115.Google Scholar
Bell, J. H. & Mehta, R. D. 1989a Three-dimensional structure of plane mixing layers. JIAA Rep. TR-90. Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Stanford University.
Bell, J. H. & Mehta, R. D. 1989b Design and calibration of the mixing layer wind tunnel. JIAA Rep. TR-89. Dept of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Stanford University.
Bell, J. H. & Mehta, R. D. 1990 Development of a two-stream mixing layer with tripped and untripped boundary layers. AIAA J. 28, 2034–2042.Google Scholar
Bell, J. H. & Mehta, R. D. 1992 Measurements of the streamwise vortical structures in a plane mixing layer. J. Fluid Mech. 239, 213–248.Google Scholar
Bell, J. H., Plesniak, M. W. & Mehta, R. D. 1992 Spanwise averaging of plane mixing layer properties. AIAA J. 30, 835–837.Google Scholar
Bernal, L. P. & Roshko, A. 1986 Streamwise vortex structure in plane mixing layers. J. Fluid Mech. 170, 499–525.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, P. 1966 The effect of initial conditions on the developments of a free shear layer. J. Fluid Mech. 26, 225–236.Google Scholar
Breidenthal, R. 1980 Response of plane shear layers and wakes to strong three-dimensional disturbances. Phys. Fluids A 23, 1929–1934.Google Scholar
Browand, F. K. & Latigo, B. O. 1979 Growth of the two-dimensional mixing layer from a turbulent and nonturbulent boundary layer. Phys. Fluids A 22, 1011–1019.Google Scholar
Browand, F. K. & Troutt, T. R. 1985 The turbulent mixing layer: geometry of large vortices. J. Fluid Mech. 158, 489–509.Google Scholar
Brown, G. L. & Roshko, A. 1974 On density effects and large structure in turbulent mixing layers. J. Fluid Mech. 64, 775–816.Google Scholar
Eckerle, W. A., Sheibani, H. & Awad, J. 1992 Experimental measurement of the vortex development downstream of a lobed mixer. Trans. ASME J: Engng Gas Turbines & Power 114, 63–71.Google Scholar
George, W. K. 1989 The self-preservation of turbulent flows and its relation to initial conditions and coherent structure. In: Advances in Turbulence (ed. R. Arndt & W. K. George), pp. 75–125. New York: Hemisphere.
Ho, C.-M. & Huerre, P. 1984 Perturbed free shear layers. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 16, 365–424.Google Scholar
Huang, L.-S. & Ho, C.-M. 1990 Small-scale transition in a plane mixing layer. J. Fluid Mech. 210, 475–500.Google Scholar
Jimenez, J. 1983 A spanwise structure in the plane mixing layer. J. Fluid Mech. 132, 319–326.Google Scholar
Jimenez, J., Cogollos, M. & Bernal, L. P. 1985 A perspective view of the plane mixing layer. J. Fluid Mech. 152, 125–143.Google Scholar
Konrad, J. H. 1976 An experimental investigation of mixing in two-dimensional turbulent shear flows with applications to diffusion-limited chemical reactions. Project SQUID Tech. Rep. CIT-8-PU; and PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology 1977.
Lasheras, J. C., Cho, J. S. & Maxworthy, T. 1986 On the origin and evolution of streamwise vortical structures in a plane, free shear layer. J. Fluid Mech. 172, 231–258.Google Scholar
Lasheras, J. C. & Choi, H. 1988 Three-dimensional instability of a plane free shear layer: an experimental study of the formation and evolution of streamwise vortices. J. Fluid Mech. 189, 53–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leboeuf, R. L. & Mehta, R. D. 1993 Streamwise vortex meander in a plane mixing layer. Phys. Fluids A 5, 1983–1991.Google Scholar
Mehta, R. D. & Westphal, R. V. 1986 Near-field turbulence properties of single- and two-stream plane mixing layers. Exps Fluids 4, 257–266.Google Scholar
Mehta, R. D. 1991 Effect of velocity ratio on plane mixing layer development: influence of the splitter plate wake. Exps Fluids 10, 194–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moser, R. D. & Rogers, M. M. 1992 Coherent structures in a simulated turbulent mixing layer. IUTAM Symposium on Eddy Structure Identification in Free Turbulent Shear Flows, Oct 12–14, Poitiers, France.
Nygaard, K. J. & Glezer, A. 1990 Core instability of the spanwise vortices in a plane mixing layer. Phys. Fluids A 2, 461–463.Google Scholar
Nygaard, K. J. & Glezer, A. 1991 Evolution of streamwise vortices and generation of small-scale motion in a plane mixing layer. J. Fluid Mech. 231, 257–301.Google Scholar
Oster, D. & Wygnanski, I. J. 1982 The forced mixing layer between parallel streams. J. Fluid Mech. 123, 91–130.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, R. T. & Widnall, S. E. 1982 The two- and three-dimensional instabilities of a spatially periodic shear layer. J. Fluid Mech. 114, 59–82.Google Scholar
Plesniak, M. W., Bell, J. H. & Mehta, R. D. 1993 Effects of small changes in initial conditions on mixing layer three-dimensionality. Exps Fluids 14, 286–288.Google Scholar
Rodi, W. 1975 A review of experimental data of uniform density free turbulent boundary layers. In Studies in Convection (ed. B. E. Launder), vol. 1, pp. 79–165, Academic.
Rogers, M. M. & Moser, R. D. 1991 The three-dimensional evolution of a plane mixing layer. Part 1. The Kelvin-Helmholtz roll-up. NASA Tech. Mem. 103856, September.
Rogers, M. M. & Moser, R. D. 1993a Spanwise scale selection in plane mixing layers. J. Fluid Mech. 247, 321–337.Google Scholar
Rogers, M. M. & Moser, R. D. 1993b Direct simulation of a self-similar turbulent mixing layer. Submitted to Phys. Fluids. AGoogle Scholar
Sandham et al. 1988 Scalar entrainment in the mixing layer. Proc. Summer Program, Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford University/NASA Ames Research Center, pp. 69–76.
Townsend, A. A. 1976 Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow (2nd edn.) Cambridge University Press.
Winant, C. D. & Browand, F. K. 1974 Vortex pairing: the mechanism of turbulent mixing layer growth at moderate Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 63, 237–255.Google Scholar