Skip to main content

Expansions at small Reynolds numbers for the flow past a sphere and a circular cylinder

  • Ian Proudman (a1) and J. R. A. Pearson (a1)

This paper is concerned with the problem of obtaining higher approximations to the flow past a sphere and a circular cylinder than those represented by the well-known solutions of Stokes and Oseen. Since the perturbation theory arising from the consideration of small non-zero Reynolds numbers is a singular one, the problem is largely that of devising suitable techniques for taking this singularity into account when expanding the solution for small Reynolds numbers.

The technique adopted is as follows. Separate, locally valid (in general), expansions of the stream function are developed for the regions close to, and far from, the obstacle. Reasons are presented for believing that these ‘Stokes’ and ‘Oseen’ expansions are, respectively, of the forms $\Sigma \;f_n(R) \psi_n(r, \theta)$ and $\Sigma \; F_n(R) \Psi_n(R_r, \theta)$ where (r, θ) are spherical or cylindrical polar coordinates made dimensionless with the radius of the obstacle, R is the Reynolds number, and $f_{(n+1)}|f_n$ and $F_{n+1}|F_n$ vanish with R. Substitution of these expansions in the Navier-Stokes equation then yields a set of differential equations for the coefficients ψn and Ψn, but only one set of physical boundary conditions is applicable to each expansion (the no-slip conditions for the Stokes expansion, and the uniform-stream condition for the Oseen expansion) so that unique solutions cannot be derived immediately. However, the fact that the two expansions are (in principle) both derived from the same exact solution leads to a ‘matching’ procedure which yields further boundary conditions for each expansion. It is thus possible to determine alternately successive terms in each expansion.

The leading terms of the expansions are shown to be closely related to the original solutions of Stokes and Oseen, and detailed results for some further terms are obtained.

Hide All
Faxén, H.1927 Nova Acta Societatis Scientianum Upsaliensis, Volumen extra ordinem.
Goldstein, S.1929 Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 123, 225.
Imai, I.1951 Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 208, 487.
Lagerstrom, P. A. & Cole, J. D.1955 J. rational Mech. Analysis, 4, 817.
Lamb, H.1911 Phil. Mag. (6), 21, 112.
Lamb, H.1932 Hydrodynamics, 6th Ed. Cambridge University Press.
Oseen, C. W.1910 Ark. f. Mat. Astr. og Fys. 6, no. 29.
Oseen, C. W.1913 Ark. f. Mat. Astr. og Fys. 9, no. 16.
Pearcey, T. & McHugh, B.1955 Phil. Mag. (7), 46, 783.
Stokes, G. G.1851 Camb. Phil. Trans. 9, 8.
Tomotika, S. & Aoi, T.1950 Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 3, 140.
Whitehead, A. N.1889 Quart. J. Math. 23, 143.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Fluid Mechanics
  • ISSN: 0022-1120
  • EISSN: 1469-7645
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-fluid-mechanics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 310 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 866 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.