Skip to main content Accessibility help

A flow separation model for hydrofoil, propeller and duct sections with blunt trailing edges

  • Weikang Du (a1) and Spyros A. Kinnas (a1)


The panel method does not apply to hydrofoils, propellers and ducts with blunt trailing edges due to the flow separation downstream. In this paper, a model is proposed to represent the flow separation with an extension, and a low-order panel method coupled with a boundary layer solver is used. The criteria of zero lift and zero moment are adopted to determine the end of the extension zone, and flow separation criteria are used to determine the starting points on either side of the section. The model is applied to hydrofoil, bare duct and ducted propeller sections with blunt trailing edges. The pressure distributions and skin frictions along the hydrofoils and ducts correlate well with those from the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes method. The thrust and torque of the propeller agree much better with experimental measurements when the extension is determined from this model rather than choosing random locations. This model requires much less computational effort while preserving high accuracy, and thus can be used reliably in designing and analysing hydrofoils and propeller ducts with blunt trailing edges.


Corresponding author

Email address for correspondence:


Hide All
Abbott, I. H. & Von Doenhoff, A. E. 1959 Theory of Wing Sections, Including a Summary of Airfoil Data. Courier Corporation.
Baltazar, J., Falcão de Campos, J. A. C. & Bosschers, J. 2012 Open-water thrust and torque predictions of a ducted propeller system with a panel method. Intl J. Rotating Mach. 2012, 111.
Bosschers, I. J. & van der Veeken, R.2008 Open water tests for propeller Ka4-70 and duct 19A with a sharp trailing edge. Tech. Rep. 224457-2-VT. Maritime Research Institute.
Bosschers, J., Willemsen, C., Peddle, A. & Rijpkema, D. 2015 Analysis of ducted propellers by combining potential flow and RANS methods. In Proc. 4th Int. Symposium on Marine Propulsors, pp. 639648. Institute for Fluid Dynamics and Ship Theory (FDS) – Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), German Society for Maritime Technology (STG).
Drela, M. 1989 XFOIL: An analysis and design system for low Reynolds number airfoils. In Low Reynolds Number Aerodynamics, pp. 112. Springer.
Greenway, M. E. & Wood, C. J. 1973 The effect of a bevelled trailing edge on vortex shedding and vibration. J. Fluid Mech. 61 (2), 323335.
Hoekstra, M. 2006 A RANS-based analysis tool for ducted propeller systems in open water condition. Intl Shipbuild. Prog. 53 (3), 205227.
Kerwin, J. E., Keenan, D. P., Black, S. D. & Diggs, J. G. 1994 A coupled viscous/potential flow design method for wake-adapted, multi-stage, ducted propulsors using generalized geometry. Trans. Soc. Nav. Archit. Mar. Engrs 102, 2356.
Kerwin, J. E., Kinnas, S. A., Lee, J.-T. & Shih, W.-Z. 1987 A surface panel method for the hydrodynamic analysis of ducted propellers. In Transactions of Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers. Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers.
Kerwin, J. E. & Lee, C.-S. 1978 Prediction of steady and unsteady marine propeller performance by numerical lifting-surface theory. In Transactions of Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers. Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers.
Kim, S., Kinnas, S. A. & Du, W. 2018 Panel method for ducted propellers with sharp trailing edge duct with fully aligned wake on blade and duct. J. Mar. Sci. Engng 6 (3), 122.
Kinnas, S. A., Fan, H. & Tian, Y. 2015 A panel method with a full wake alignment model for the prediction of the performance of ducted propellers. J. Ship Res. 59 (4), 246257.
Kinnas, S. A., Lee, H., Sun, H. & He, L. 2007 Performance prediction of single or multi-component propulsors using coupled viscous/inviscid methods. In Proc. 10th Int. Symposium on the Practical Design of Ships and other Floating Structures, Houston, TX. American Bureau of Shipping.
Kuiper, G.1992 The Wageningen propeller series. Tech. Rep. 92-001. Published on the occasion of the 60th anniversary of the Maritime Research Institute (MRINE).
Lee, H. & Kinnas, S. A. 2006 Prediction of cavitating performance of ducted propellers. In Proc. 6th Int. Symposium on Cavitation, CAV2006. Maritime Research Institute Netherlands (MARIN).
Magi, E. C. & Gai, S. L. 1998 Flow behind castellated blunt-trailing-edge aerofoils at supersonic speeds. J. Fluid Mech. 375, 85111.
Majdfar, S., Ghassemi, H., Forouzan, H. & Ashrafi, A. 2017 Hydrodynamic prediction of the ducted propeller by CFD solver. J. Mar. Sci. Technol. 25 (3), 268275.
Moulijn, J. 2015 Application of various computational methods to predict the performance and cavitation of ducted propellers. In Proc. 4th Int. Symposium on Marine Propulsors, vol. 15, p. 31. Institute for Fluid Dynamics and Ship Theory (FDS) – Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), German Society for Maritime Technology (STG).
Pan, Y. & Kinnas, S. A. 2011 A viscous/inviscid interactive approach for the prediction of performance of hydrofoils and propellers with nonzero trailing edge thickness. J. Ship Res. 55 (1), 4563.
Park, H., Lee, D., Jeon, W.-P., Hahn, S., Kim, J., Kim, J., Choi, J. & Choi, H. 2006 Drag reduction in flow over a two-dimensional bluff body with a blunt trailing edge using a new passive device. J. Fluid Mech. 563, 389414.
Pope, S. B. 2000 Turbulent Flows. Cambridge University Press.
Reynolds, O. 1894 On the dynamical theory of incompressible viscous fluids and the determination of the criterion. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 186, 123164.
Servini, P., Smith, F. T. & Rothmayer, A. P. 2017 The impact of static and dynamic roughness elements on flow separation. J. Fluid Mech. 830, 3562.
Su, Y. & Kinnas, S. A. 2017 A generalized potential/RANS interactive method for the prediction of propulsor performance. J. Ship Res. 61 (4), 214229.
Surana, A., Grunberg, O. & Haller, G. 2006 Exact theory of three-dimensional flow separation. Part 1. Steady separation. J. Fluid Mech. 564, 57103.
Tian, Y. & Kinnas, S. A. 2012 A wake model for the prediction of propeller performance at low advance ratios. Intl J. Rotating Mach. 2012, 111.
MathJax is a JavaScript display engine for mathematics. For more information see

JFM classification


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed