Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T12:00:42.696Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hydrodynamics and scaling laws for intermittent S-start swimming

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2024

Dewu Yang
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Unsteady Aerodynamics and Flow Control, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Department of Aerodynamics, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, PR China School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, PR China
Jie Wu*
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Unsteady Aerodynamics and Flow Control, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Department of Aerodynamics, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, PR China
Kaustubh Khedkar
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA
Li-Ming Chao*
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen), Shenzhen 518055, PR China
Amneet Pal Singh Bhalla*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA
*
Email addresses for correspondence: wuj@nuaa.edu.cn, chaoliming92@gmail.com, asbhalla@sdsu.edu
Email addresses for correspondence: wuj@nuaa.edu.cn, chaoliming92@gmail.com, asbhalla@sdsu.edu
Email addresses for correspondence: wuj@nuaa.edu.cn, chaoliming92@gmail.com, asbhalla@sdsu.edu

Abstract

The hydrodynamics of a self-propelling swimmer undergoing intermittent S-start swimming are investigated extensively with varying duty cycle $DC$, swimming period $T$, and tailbeat amplitude $A$. We find that the steady time-averaged swimming speed $\bar {U}_x$ increases directly with $A$, but varies inversely with $DC$ and $T$, where there is a maximal improvement of $541.29\,\%$ over continuous cruising swimming. Our results reveal two scaling laws, in the form of input versus output relations, that relate the swimmer's kinematics to its hydrodynamic performance: swimming speed and efficiency. A smaller $DC$ causes increased fluctuations in the swimmer's velocity generation. A larger $A$, on the other hand, allows the swimmer to reach steady swimming more quickly. Although we set out to determine scaling laws for intermittent S-start swimming, these scaling laws extend naturally to burst-and-coast and continuous modes of swimming. Additionally, we have identified, categorized and linked the wake structures produced by intermittent S-start swimmers with their velocity generation.

Type
JFM Papers
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akoz, E., Han, P., Liu, G., Dong, H. & Moored, K.W. 2019 Large-amplitude intermittent swimming in viscous and inviscid flows. AIAA J. 57, 36783685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akoz, E. & Moored, K.W. 2018 Unsteady propulsion by an intermittent swimming gait. J. Fluid Mech. 834, 149172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashraf, I., Wassenbergh, S.V. & Verma, S. 2021 Burst-and-coast swimming is not always energetically beneficial in fish (Hemigrammus bleheri). Bioinspir. Biomim. 16, 016002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bale, R., Hao, M., Bhalla, A.P.S. & Patankar, N.A. 2014 Energy efficiency and allometry of movement of swimming and flying animals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 75177521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhalla, A.P.S., Bale, R., Griffith, B.E. & Patankar, N.A. 2013 a A unified mathematical framework and an adaptive numerical method for fluid–structure interaction with rigid, deforming, and elastic bodies. J. Comput. Phys. 250, 446476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhalla, A.P.S., Griffith, B.E. & Patankar, N.A. 2013 b A forced damped oscillation framework for undulatory swimming provides new insights into how propulsion arises in active and passive swimming. PLoS Comput. Biol. 9 (6), e1003097.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borazjani, I., Sotiropoulos, F., Tytell, E.D. & Lauder, G.V. 2012 Hydrodynamics of the bluegill sunfish C-start escape response: three-dimensional simulations and comparison with experimental data. J. Expl Biol. 215, 671684.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brett, J.R. & Sutherland, D.B. 1965 Respiratory metabolism of pumpkinseed (Lepomis gibbosus) in relation to swimming speed. J. Fish. Board Canada 22 (2), 405409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chao, L.-M., Alam, M.M. & Cheng, L. 2022 Hydrodynamic performance of slender swimmer: effect of traveling wavelength. J. Fluid Mech. 947, A8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chuang, M.-H. 2009 On burst-and-coast swimming performance in fish-like locomotion. Bioinspir. Biomim. 4, 036001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dai, L., He, G., Zhang, X. & Zhang, X. 2018 Intermittent locomotion of a fish-like swimmer driven by passive elastic mechanism. Bioinspir. Biomim. 13, 056011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Domenici, P. & Blake, R.W. 1997 The kinematics and performance of fish fast-start swimming. J. Expl Biol. 200, 11651178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Floryan, D., Van Buren, T. & Smits, A.J. 2017 Forces and energetics of intermittent swimming. Acta Mechanica Sin. 33, 725732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floryan, D., Van Buren, T. & Smits, A.J. 2018 Efficient cruising for swimming and flying animals is dictated by fluid drag. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 81168118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Floryan, D., Van Buren, T. & Smits, A.J. 2019 Large-amplitude oscillations of foils for efficient propulsion. Phys. Rev. Fluids 4, 093102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gazzola, M., Argentina, M. & Mahadevan, L. 2014 Scaling macroscopic aquatic locomotion. Nat. Phys. 10, 758761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gazzola, M., Rees, W.M.V. & Koumoutsakos, P. 2012 C-start: optimal start of larval fish. J. Fluid Mech. 698, 518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleiss, A.C., et al. 2011 Convergent evolution in locomotory patterns of flying and swimming animals. Nat. Commun. 2, 352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffith, B.E. 2009 An accurate and efficient method for the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations using the projection method as a preconditioner. J. Comput. Phys. 228, 75657595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, B.E. & Patankar, N.A. 2020 Immersed methods for fluid–structure interaction. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 52, 421448.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gupta, S., Thekkethil, N., Agrawal, A., Hourigan, K., Thompson, M.C. & Sharma, A. 2021 Body-caudal fin fish-inspired self-propulsion study on burst-and-coast and continuous swimming of a hydrofoil model. Phys. Fluids 33, 091905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoover, A.P., Cortez, R., Tytell, E.D. & Fauci, L.J. 2018 Swimming performance, resonance and shape evolution in heaving flexible panels. J. Fluid Mech. 847, 386416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobsen, H.A. 2008 Chemical Reactor Modeling. Multiphase Reactive Flows. Springer.Google Scholar
Li, G., Ashraf, I., Francois, B., Kolomenskiy, D., Lechenault, F., Godoy-Diana, R. & Thiria, B. 2021 Burst-and-coast swimmers optimize gait by adapting unique intrinsic cycle. Commun. Biol. 4, 40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, G., Muller, U.K., Van Leeuwen, J.L. & Liu, H. 2014 Escape trajectories are deflected when fish larvae intercept their own C-start wake. J. R. Soc. Interface 11, 20140848.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, K., Huang, H. & Lu, X.-Y. 2020 Hydrodynamic benefits of intermittent locomotion of a self-propelled flapping plate. Phys. Rev. E 102, 053106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patel, N.K., Bhalla, A.P.S. & Patankar, N.A. 2018 A new constraint-based formulation for hydrodynamically resolved computational neuromechanics of swimming animals. J. Comput. Phys. 375, 684716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanchez-Rodriguez, J., Raufaste, C. & Argentina, M. 2023 Scaling the tail beat frequency and swimming speed in underwater undulatory swimming. Nat. Commun. 14 (1), 5569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Triantafyllou, M.S. 2012 Survival hydrodynamics. J. Fluid Mech. 598, 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triantafyllou, M.S., Weymouth, G.D. & Miao, J. 2016 Biomimetic survival hydrodynamics and flow sensing. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 48, 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tytell, E.D., Leftwich, M.C., Hsu, C.-Y., Griffith, B.E., Cohen, A.H., Smits, A.J., Hamlet, C. & Fauci, L.J. 2016 Role of body stiffness in undulatory swimming: insights from robotic and computational models. Phys. Rev. Fluids 1, 073202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Videler, J.J. & Hess, F. 1984 Fast continuous swimming of two pelagic predators, saithe (Pollachius virens) and mackerel (Scomber scombrus): a kinematic analysis. J. Expl Biol. 109, 209228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weihs, D. 1973 The mechanism of rapid starting of slender fish. Biorheology 10, 343350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williamson, C.H.K. & Roshko, A. 1988 Vortex formation in the wake of an oscillating cylinder. J. Fluid Struct. 2, 355381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Yang et al. supplementary movie

Comparison between the swimming behavior of zebrafish larvae using the S-start swimming and continuous swimming pattern.
Download Yang et al. supplementary movie(File)
File 8.2 MB