Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-wjfd9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-28T07:43:32.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The hypersonic inlet buzz evolution under the fluid–structure interaction effect with a flexible plate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2025

Kun Ye*
Affiliation:
School of Aeronautics, Northwestern Polytechnical University , Xi’an, 710072, PR China National Key Laboratory of Aircraft Configuration Design, Xi’an, 710072, PR China Institute of Extreme Mechanics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an, 710072, PR China
Yanqiu Guo
Affiliation:
School of Aeronautics, Northwestern Polytechnical University , Xi’an, 710072, PR China National Key Laboratory of Aircraft Configuration Design, Xi’an, 710072, PR China Institute of Extreme Mechanics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an, 710072, PR China
Xinxin Zhou
Affiliation:
School of Aeronautics, Northwestern Polytechnical University , Xi’an, 710072, PR China National Key Laboratory of Aircraft Configuration Design, Xi’an, 710072, PR China Institute of Extreme Mechanics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an, 710072, PR China
Hengsheng Zhang
Affiliation:
School of Aeronautics, Northwestern Polytechnical University , Xi’an, 710072, PR China Aircraft Strength Research Institute of China, Xi’an, 710065, PR China
Zhengyin Ye
Affiliation:
School of Aeronautics, Northwestern Polytechnical University , Xi’an, 710072, PR China National Key Laboratory of Aircraft Configuration Design, Xi’an, 710072, PR China Institute of Extreme Mechanics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an, 710072, PR China
*
Corresponding author: Kun Ye, yekun@nwpu.edu.cn

Abstract

For hypersonic inlets, buzz is a self-sustained oscillatory flow characterised by strong nonlinear and unsteady behaviour. Our recent study shows that, unlike conventional alterations in flow conditions at the inlet entrance or exit, flexible lip deformation is a newly identified trigger for buzz. However, the mechanism by which this fluid–structure interaction (FSI) behaviour induces buzz remains unclear. To clarify how FSI acts as a dominant factor in triggering flow instability leading to buzz, this study investigates a more general flexible plate model within the inlet. The results show that the plate FSI introduces a prolonged instability accumulation process for buzz evolution, resulting in a ‘gradual-onset’ characteristic differing from previous studies. During this process, plate FSI amplifies downstream flow oscillations while accumulating unstable energy. Eventually, the excessive unstable energy causes the shock train to destabilise and be disgorged from the inlet, initiating a complete instability process dominated by buzz. Notably, buzz induced by plate FSI exhibits unsteady characteristics similar to those observed in rigid inlets. Therefore, as an internal self-excited disturbance source, plate FSI produces relatively weaker disturbances than conventional flow modifications, but exhibits highly persistent accumulation effects and distinct multistage characteristics. This study reveals the buzz evolution mechanism under plate FSI, providing new insights into flow instability in hypersonic inlets.

Information

Type
JFM Papers
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abedi, M., Askari, R. & Soltani, M.R. 2020 Numerical simulation of inlet buzz. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 97, 105547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baccarella, D., Liu, Q., McGann, B., Lee, G. & Lee, T. 2021 Isolator–combustor interactions in a circular model scramjet with thermal and non-thermal choking-induced unstart. J. Fluid Mech. 917, A38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berto, F., Benini, E., Wyatt, C. & Quinn, M.K. 2020 Time-accurate experimental investigation of hypersonic inlet buzz at Mach 5. AIAA J. 58 (5), 21972205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhattrai, S., McQuellin, L.P., Currao, G.M.D., Neely, A.J. & Buttsworth, D.R. 2022 Experimental study of aeroelastic response and performance of a hypersonic intake ramp. J. Propul. Power 38 (1), 157170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyer, N.R., McZnamara, J.J., Gaitonde, D.V., Barnes, C.J. & Visbal, M.R. 2018 Features of shock-induced panel flutter in three-dimensional inviscid flow. J. Fluid Mech. 83, 490506.Google Scholar
Brenner, S.C. & Scott, L.R. 2008 The Mathematical Theory of Finite Element Methods. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouwer, K.R., Perez, R.A., Beberniss, T.J., Spottswood, S.M. & Ehrhardt, D.A. 2021 Experiments on a thin panel excited by turbulent flow and shock/boundary-layer interactions. AIAA J. 59 (7), 27372752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, J., Wang, L., Bao, W., Qin, J., Niu, J. & Xue, W. 2012 Novel oscillatory patterns of hypersonic inlet buzz. J. Propul. Power 28 (6), 12141221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, J., Zhang, J., Bao, W. & Yu, D. 2018 Research progress on strut-equipped supersonic combustors for scramjet application. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 103, 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daub, D., Willems, S. & Gülhan, A. 2016 Experiments on the interaction of a fast-moving shock with an elastic panel. AIAA J. 54 (2), 670678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devaraj, M.K.K., Jutur, P., Rao, S.M.V., Jagadeesh, G. & Anavardham, G.T.K. 2020 Experimental investigation of unstart dynamics driven by subsonic spillage in a hypersonic scramjet intake at Mach 6. Phys. Fluids 32 (2), 026103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devaraj, M.K.K., Jutur, P., Rao, S.M.V., Jagadeesh, G. & Anavardham, G.T.K. 2021 Length scale for the estimation of buzz frequency in the limit of high mechanical blockage in mixed-compression intakes. J. Fluid Mech. 916, R3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farhat, C. & Lesoinne, M. 2000 Two efficient staggered algorithms for the serial and parallel solution of three-dimensional nonlinear transient aeroelastic problems. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engng 182 (3–4), 499515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordnier, R.E. & Visbal, M.R. 2002 Development of a three-dimensional viscous aeroelastic solver for nonlinear panel flutter. J. Fluid. Struct. 16 (4), 497527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goura, G.S.L., Badcock, K.J., Woodgate, M.A. & Richards, B.E. 2001 A data exchange method for fluid–structure interaction problems. Aeronaut. J. 105 (1046), 215221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong, W. & Kim, C. 2014 Computational study on hysteretic inlet buzz characteristics under varying mass flow conditions. AIAA J. 52 (7), 13571373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong, Z., Ye, Z. & Ye, K. 2023 Effect of two-dimensional micro-cavity surface on hypersonic boundary layer. Acta Astronaut. 206, 188205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, H., Tan, H., Cai, J. & Sun, S. 2021 Restart processes of rectangular hypersonic inlets with different internal contraction ratios. AIAA J. 59 (7), 24272439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Im, S. & Do, H. 2018 Unstart phenomena induced by flow choking in scramjet inlet-isolators. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 97, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, J.K., Suryan, A. & Kim, H.D. 2021 Buzz characteristics and separation bubble dynamics in supersonic intake. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 115, 106795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jovanović, M.R., Schmid, P.J. & Nichols, J.W. 2014 Sparsity-promoting dynamic mode decomposition. Phys. Fluids 26 (2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khobragade, N., Unnikrishnan, S. & Kumar, R. 2022 Flow instabilities and impact of ramp-isolator junction on shock–boundary-layer interactions in a supersonic intake. J. Fluid Mech. 953, A30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kline, H., Palacios, F. & Alonso, J.J. 2014 Sensitivity of the performance of a 3-dimensional hypersonic inlet to shape deformations, In Proceedings of the 19th AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference (AIAA AVIATION Forum), Atlanta, GA, USA. AIAA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamorte, N., Friedmann, P.P., Dalle, D.J., Torrez, S.M. & Driscoll, J.F. 2015 Uncertainty propagation in integrated airframe–propulsion system analysis for hypersonic vehicles. J. Propul. Power 31 (1), 5468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Z., Gao, W., Jiang, H. & Yang, J. 2013 Unsteady behaviors of a hypersonic inlet caused by throttling in shock tunnel. AIAA J. 51 (10), 24852492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liao, F., Ye, Z. & Zhang, L. 2015 Extending geometric conservation law to cell-centered finite difference methods on stationary grids. J. Comput. Phys. 284, 419433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, H., Yan, C., Zhao, Y. & Qin, Y. 2018 Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of flow parameters on aerodynamics of a hypersonic inlet. Acta Astronaut. 151, 703716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Y., Nam, J., Kim, Y., Jun, D., Lee, B.J. & Lee, Y.J. 2023 Validation of numerical simulations for investigating flow control in hypersonic inlets. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 140, 108452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinartz, B.U., Herrmann, C.D., Ballmann, J. & Koschel, W.W. 2003 Aerodynamic performance analysis of a hypersonic inlet isolator using computation and experiment. J. Propul. Power 19 (5), 868875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowley, C.W. & Dawson, S.T.M. 2017 Model reduction for flow analysis and control. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 49, 387417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, P.J. 2010 Dynamic mode decomposition of numerical and experimental data. J. Fluid Mech. 656, 528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shi, W., Chang, J., Wang, Y., Bao, W. & Liu, X. 2019 Buzz evolution process investigation of a two-ramp inlet with translating cowl. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 84, 712723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shinde, V.J., McNamara, J.J., Gaitonde, D.V., Barnes, C.J. & Visbal, M. 2018 Panel flutter induced by transitional shock wave boundary layer interaction, In Proceedings of the 2018 AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference (AIAA AVIATION Forum), Atlanta, GA, USA. AIAA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sziroczak, D. & Smith, H. 2016 A review of design issues specific to hypersonic flight vehicles. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 84, 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, H., Li, L., Wen, Y. & Zhang, Q. 2011 Experimental investigation of the unstart process of a generic hypersonic inlet. AIAA J. 49 (2), 279288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, H., Sun, S. & Yin, Z. 2009 Oscillatory flows of rectangular hypersonic inlet unstart caused by downstream mass-flow choking. J. Propul. Power 25 (1), 138147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visbal, M. 2012 On the interaction of an oblique shock with a flexible panel. J. Fluid. Struct. 30, 219225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, J.L., Yuceil, K.B., Valdivia, A., Clemens, N.T. & Dolling, D.S. 2009 Experimental investigation of unstart in an inlet/isolator model in Mach 5 flow. AIAA J. 47 (6), 15281542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiong, B., Fan, X. & Wang, Y., 2021 Design and evaluation of a conical hypersonic vehicle with an overturned aerodynamic layout. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 118, 106979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiong, B., Fan, X., Wang, Z. & Tao, Y. 2018 Analysis and modelling of unsteady shock train motions. J. Fluid Mech. 846, 240262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, K., Chang, J., Zhou, W. & Yu, D. 2017 Mechanism of shock train rapid motion induced by variation of attack angle. Acta Astronaut. 140, 1826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, S., Wang, Y., Wang, Z., Fan, X. & & Xiong, B. 2022 Unsteady behavior of hypersonic inlet unstart caused by high angle of attack. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 130, 107884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ye, K., Ye, Z., Li, C. & Wu, J. 2019 Effects of the aerothermoelastic deformation on the performance of the three-dimensional hypersonic inlet. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 84, 747762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ye, K., Zhang, Y., Chen, Z. & Ye, Z. 2022 Numerical investigation of aeroelastic characteristics of grid fin. AIAA J. 60 (5), 31073121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ye, K., Zhou, X. & Ye, Z. 2024 Buzz characteristics under fluid–structure interaction of variable-geometry lip for hypersonic inlet. AIAA J. 62 (5), 16621682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ye, L. & Ye, Z. 2018 Effects of shock location on aeroelastic stability of flexible panel. AIAA J. 56 (9), 37323744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zha, Z., Ye, K. & Ye, Z. 2022 Stability analysis of shock-mixing interaction based on dynamic mode decomposition. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 123, 107492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Q., Tan, H., Chen, H., Yuan, Y. & Zhang, Y. 2016 a Unstart process of a rectangular hypersonic inlet at different Mach numbers. AIAA J. 54 (12), 36813691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Q., Tan, H., Sun, S., Bu, H. & Rao, C. 2016 b Unstart of a hypersonic inlet with side compression caused by downstream choking. AIAA J. 54 (1), 2838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y., Ye, K. & Ye, Z. 2024 On the aeroelastic bifurcation of a flexible panel subjected to cavity pressure and inviscid oblique shock. J. Fluid Mech. 986, A28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Ye et al. supplementary movie 1

Flow-field pressure gradient distribution throughout the entire evolution from instability to buzz in a rigid inlet.
Download Ye et al. supplementary movie 1(File)
File 898.4 KB
Supplementary material: File

Ye et al. supplementary movie 2

Flow-field pressure gradient distribution throughout the entire evolution from instability to buzz in a plate FSI inlet.
Download Ye et al. supplementary movie 2(File)
File 209.1 MB
Supplementary material: File

Ye et al. supplementary movie 3

Pressure gradient distributions of flowfield at stage I during a typical cycle.
Download Ye et al. supplementary movie 3(File)
File 19.7 MB
Supplementary material: File

Ye et al. supplementary movie 4

Pressure gradient distributions of flowfield at stage II during a typical cycle.
Download Ye et al. supplementary movie 4(File)
File 740.1 KB
Supplementary material: File

Ye et al. supplementary movie 5

Pressure gradient distributions of flowfield at stage III.
Download Ye et al. supplementary movie 5(File)
File 963.4 KB
Supplementary material: File

Ye et al. supplementary movie 6

Pressure gradient distributions of flowfield at stage IV during a typical cycle.
Download Ye et al. supplementary movie 6(File)
File 1.9 MB