Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T06:50:55.239Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Inertial scaling of dissipation in unsteady breaking waves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 September 2008

DAVID A. DRAZEN
Affiliation:
Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0213, USA
W. KENDALL MELVILLE
Affiliation:
Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0213, USA
LUC LENAIN
Affiliation:
Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0213, USA

Abstract

Wave dissipation by breaking, or the energy transfer from the surface wave field to currents and turbulence, is one of the least understood components of air–sea interaction. It is important for a better understanding of the coupling between the surface wave field and the upper layers of the ocean and for improved surface-wave prediction schemes. Simple scaling arguments show that the wave dissipation per unit length of breaking crest, ϵl, should be proportional to ρwgc5, where ρw is the density of water, g is the acceleration due to gravity and c is the phase speed of the breaking wave. The proportionality factor, or ‘breaking parameter’ b, has been poorly constrained by experiments and field measurements, although our earlier work has suggested that it should be dependent on measures of the wave slope and spectral bandwidth. In this paper we describe inertial scaling arguments for the energy lost by plunging breakers which predict that the breaking parameter b = β(hk)5/2, where hk is a local breaking slope parameter, and β is a parameter of O(1). This prediction is tested with laboratory measurements of breaking due to dispersive focusing of wave packets in a wave channel. Good agreement is found within the scatter of the data. We also find that if an integral linear measure of the maximum slope of the wave packet, S, is used instead of hk, then bS2.77 gives better agreement with the data. During the final preparation of this paper we became aware of similar experiments by Banner & Peirson (2007) concentrating on the threshold for breaking at lower wave slopes, using a measure of the rate of focusing of wave energy to correlate measurements of b. We discuss the significance of these results in the context of recent measurements and modelling of surface wave processes.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Banner, M. L. & Peirson, W. L. 2007 Wave breaking onset and strength for two-dimensional deep water waves groups. J. Fluid Mech. 585, 93115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banner, M. L. & Peregrine, D. H. 1993 Wave breaking in deep water. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 25, 373397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deane, G. B. & Stokes, D. 2002 Scale dependence of bubble creation mechanisms in breaking waves. Nature 418, 839844.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drazen, D. A. 2006 Laboratory studies of nonlinear and breaking surface waves. PhD thesis, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Drazen, D. A. & Melville, W. K. 2008 Inertial estimates of dissipation in unsteady breaking waves. J. Fluid Mech. (Submitted).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, J. H. 1981 An experimental investigation of breaking waves produced by a towed hydrofoil. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 377, 331348.Google Scholar
Duncan, J. H. 1983 The breaking and non-breaking wave resistance of a two-dimensional hydrofoil. J. Fluid Mech. 126, 507520.Google Scholar
Duncan, J. H. 2001 Spilling breakers. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 33, 519547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedorov, A. & Melville, W. K. 1998 Nonlinear gravity–capillary waves with forcing and dissipation. J. Fluid Mech. 354, 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gemmrich, J. 2005 On the occurrence of wave breaking. In Rogue Waves, Proc. Aha Hulikoa Hawaiian Winter Workshop (ed. Müller, P. & Henderson, D.), pp. 123–130.Google Scholar
Gemmrich, J. 2007 Momentum flux and energy dissipation associated with breaking waves. In Transport at the Air–Sea Interface – Measurements, Models and Parameterizations (ed. Garbe, C. S., Handler, R. A. & Jähne, B.), pp. 133144. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komen, G. J., Hasselmann, S. & Hasselmann, K. 1984 On the existence of a fully developed wind–sea spectrum. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 14, 12711285.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamarre, E. & Melville, W. K. 1991 Air entrainment and dissipation in breaking waves. Nature 351, 469472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lighthill, J. 1978 Waves in Fluids. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Loewen, M. R. 1991 Laboratory measurements of the sound generated by breaking waves. PhD thesis, MIT/WHOI Joint Program.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loewen, M. R. & Melville, W. K. 1991 Microwave backscatter and acoustic radiation from breaking waves. J. Fluid Mech. 224, 601623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longuet-Higgins, M. S. 1974 Breaking waves in deep or shallow water. In Proc. 10th Symp. on Naval Hydrodynamics (ed. Cooper, R. D. & Doroff, S. D.), pp. 597605. Office of Naval Research, Arlington, Virginia.Google Scholar
Melville, W. K. 1994 Energy dissipation by breaking waves. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 24, 20412049.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melville, W. K. 1996 The role of surface-wave breaking in air–sea interaction. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 28, 279321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melville, W. K. & Matusov, P. 2002 Distribution of breaking waves at the ocean surface. Nature 417, 5863.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melville, W. K. & Rapp, R. J. 1985 Momentum flux in breaking waves. Nature 317, 514516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melville, W. K., Veron, F. & White, C. 2002 The velocity field under breaking waves: coherent structures and turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 454, 203233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melville, W. K., Romero, L. & Kleiss, J. M. 2005 Extreme wave events in the Gulf of Tehuantepec. In Rogue Waves, Proc. Aha Hulikoa Hawaiian Winter Workshop (ed. Müller, P. & Henderson, D.), pp. 23–28.Google Scholar
Pearson, B. R., Krogstad, P.-Å & van de Water, W. 2002 Measurements of the turbulent energy dissipation rate. Phys. Fluids 14 (3), 12881290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perlin, M., He, J. & Bernal, L. P. 1996 An experimental study of deep water plunging breakers. Phys. Fluids 8 (9), 23652374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, O. M. 1985 Spectral and statistical properties of the equilibrium range in wind-generated gravity waves. J. Fluid Mech. 156, 505531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, O. M., Posner, F. L. & Hansen, J. P. 2001 High range resolution radar measurements of the speed distribution of breaking events in wind-generated ocean waves: surface impulse and wave energy dissipation rates. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 31, 450460.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapp, R. J. & Melville, W. K. 1990 Laboratory measurements of deep-water breaking waves. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 331, 735800.Google Scholar
Song, J. B. & Banner, M. L. 2002 On determining the onset and strength of breaking for deep water waves. Part 1: Unforced irrotational wave groups. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 32, 25412558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sreenivasan, K. R. 1984 On the scaling of the turbulence energy dissipation rate. Phys. Fluids 27 (5), 10481051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, P. P., McWilliams, J. C. & Melville, W. K. 2004 The oceanic boundary layer driven by wave breaking with stochastic variability. Part 1. Direct numerical simulations. J. Fluid Mech. 507, 143174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, P. P., McWilliams, C. J. & Melville, W. K. 2007 Surface gravity wave effects in the oceanic boundary layer: large-eddy simulation with vortex force and stochastic breakers. J. Fluid Mech. 593, 405452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svendsen, I. A. 1987 Analysis of surf zone turbulence. J. Geophys. Res. 92 (C5), 51155130.Google Scholar
Van Dorn, W. G. & Pazan, S. E. 1975 Laboratory investigation of wave breaking. Part ii: Deep water waves. Advanced Ocean Engng Lab. Rep. 71 75–21. Scripps Institution of Oceanography.CrossRefGoogle Scholar