Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T21:03:43.739Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Investigation of the subgrid-scale fluxes and their production rates in a convective atmospheric surface layer using measurement data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2010

QINGLIN CHEN ,
SHUAISHUAI LIU  and
CHENNING TONG
QINGLIN CHEN
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA
SHUAISHUAI LIU
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA
CHENNING TONG*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA
*
†Email address for correspondence: ctong@ces.clemson.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The subgrid-scale (SGS) potential temperature flux and stress in the atmospheric surface layer are studied using field measurement data. We analyse the mean values of the SGS temperature flux, the SGS temperature flux production rate, the SGS temperature variance production rate, the SGS stress and the SGS stress production rate conditional on both the resolvable-scale velocity and temperature, which must be reproduced by SGS models for large-eddy simulation to reproduce the one-point resolvable-scale velocity–temperature joint probability density function (JPDF). The results show that the conditional statistics generally depend on the resolvable-scale velocity and temperature fluctuations, indicating that these conditional variables have strong influences on the resolvable-scale statistics. The dependencies of the conditional SGS stress and the SGS stress production rate, which are partly due to the effects of flow history and buoyancy, suggest that model predictions of the SGS stress also affect the resolvable-scale temperature statistics. The results for the conditional flux and the conditional flux production rate vectors have similar trends. These conditional vectors are also well aligned. The positive temperature fluctuations associated with updrafts are found to have a qualitatively different influence on the conditional statistics than the negative temperature fluctuations associated with downdrafts. The conditional temperature flux and the temperature flux production rate predicted using several SGS models are compared with measurements in statistical a priori tests. The predictions using the nonlinear model are found to be closely related to the predictions using the Smagorinsky model. Several potential effects of the SGS model deficiencies on the resolvable-scale statistics, such as the overprediction of the vertical mean temperature gradient and the underprediction of the vertical temperature flux, are identified. The results suggest that efforts to improve the LES prediction of a resolvable-scale statistic must consider all the relevant SGS components identified using the JPDF equation and the surface layer dynamics. This study also provides impetus for further investigations of the JPDF equation, especially analytical studies on the relationship between the JPDF and the SGS terms that govern its evolution.

JFM classification

Turbulent Flows: Turbulent boundary layers Turbulent Flows: Turbulence modelling Turbulent Flows: Turbulence simulation
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 660 , 10 October 2010 , pp. 282 - 315
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bardina, J., Ferziger, J. H. & Reynolds, W. C. 1980 Improved subgrid scale models for large eddy simulation. Paper 80-1357. AIAA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borue, V. & Orszag, S. 1998 Local energy flux and subgrid-scale statistics in three-dimensional turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 366, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Businger, J. A., Wyngaard, J. C., Izumi, Y. & Bradley, E. F. 1971 Flux–profile relationships in the atmospheric surface layer. J. Atmos. Sci. 28, 181–189.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cerutti, S., Meneveau, C. & Knio, O. M. 2000 Spectral and hyper eddy viscosity in high-Reynolds-number turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 421, 307–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Q., Otte, M., Sullivan, P. P. & Tong, C. 2009 A posteriori subgrid-scale model tests based on the conditional means of subgrid-scale stress and its production rate. J. Fluid Mech. 626, 149–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Q. & Tong, C. 2006 Investigation of the subgrid-scale stress and its production rate in a convective atmospheric boundary layer using measurement data. J. Fluid Mech. 547, 65–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Q., Wang, D., Zhang, H. & Tong, C. 2005 Effects of subgrid-scale turbulence on resolvable-scale velocity–scalar statistics. J. Turbulence 6, 36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Q., Zhang, H., Wang, D. & Tong, C. 2003 Subgrid-scale stress and its production rate: conditions for the resolvable-scale velocity probability density function. J. Turbulence 4, 027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, R. A., Ferziger, J. H. & Reynolds, W. C. 1979 Evaluation of subgrid-models using an accurately simulated turbulent flow. J. Fluid Mech. 91, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domaradzki, J. A., Liu, W. & Brachet, M. E. 1993 An analysis of subgrid-scale interactions in numerically simulated isotropic turbulence. Phys. Fluids A 5, 1747–1759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edsall, R. M., Thomson, D. W., Wyngaard, J. C. & Peltier, L. J. 1995 A technique for measurement of resolvable-scale flux budgets. In 11th Symposium on Boundary Layers and Turbulence, pp. 15–17. American Meteorological Society.Google Scholar
Härtel, C., Kleiser, L., Unger, F. & Friedrich, R. 1994 Subgrid-scale energy-transfer in the near-wall region of turbulent flow. Phys. Fluids 6, 3130–3143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, C. W., Meneveau, C. & Parlange, M. B. 2007 The effect of filter dimension on the subgrid-scale stress, heat flux, and tensor alignments in the atmospheric surface layer. J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech. 24, 360–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horst, T. W., Kleissl, J., Lenschow, D. H., Meneveau, C., Moeng, C.-H., Parlange, M. B., Sullivan, P. P. & Weil, J. C. 2004 HATS: field observations to obtain spatially-filtered turbulence fields from transverse arrays of sonic anemometers in the atmospheric surface flux layer. J. Atmos. Sci. 61, 1566–1581.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaberi, F. A., Miller, R. S. & Givi, P. 1996 Conditional statistics in turbulent scalar mixing and reaction. AIChE J. 42, 1149–1152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juneja, A. & Brasseur, J. G. 1999 Characteristics of subgrid-resolved-scale dynamics in anisotropic turbulence, with application to rough-wall boundary layers. Phys. Fluids 11, 3054–3068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaimal, J. C., Wyngaard, J. C., Izumi, Y. & Coté, O. R. 1972 Spectral characteristic of surface-layer turbulence. Q.J.R. Met. Soc. 98, 563–589.Google Scholar
Kelly, M., Wyngaard, J. C. & Sullivan, P. P. 2009 Application of a subfilter-scale flux model over the ocean using OHATS field data. J. Atmos. Sci. 66, 3217–3225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleissl, J., Meneveau, C. & Parlange, M. 2003 On the magnitude and variability of subgrid-scale eddy-diffusion coefficients in the atmospheric surface layer. J. Atmos. Sci. 60, 2372–2388.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenschow, D. H. & Stephens, P. L. 1980 The role of thermals in the convective boundary layer. Bound. Layer Meteor. 19, 509–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, A. 1974 Energy cascade in large-eddy simulations of turbulent fluid flows. Adv. Geophys. 18, 237–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lilly, D. K. 1967 The representation of small-scale turbulence in numerical simulation experiments. In Proceedings of IBM Scientific Computing Symposium on Environment Science, p. 195.Google Scholar
Liu, S., Meneveau, C. & Katz, J. 1994 On the properties of similarity subgrid-scale models as deduced from measurements in a turbulent jet. J. Fluid Mech. 275, 83–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lumley, J. L. 1978 Computational modeling of turbulent flows. Adv. Appl. Mech. 18, 123–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lund, T. S. & Novikov, E. A. 1992 Parametrization of subgrid-scale stress by the velocity gradient tensor. In Annual Research Briefs, pp. 27–43. Stanford, CA: Center for Turbulence Research.Google Scholar
Mason, P. J. 1994 Large-eddy simulation: a critical review of the technique. Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 120, 1–26.Google Scholar
Mason, P. J. & Brown, A. R. 1994 The sensitivity of large-eddy simulations of turbulent shear flows to subgrid-scale models. Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 70, 133–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, P. J. & Thomson, D. J. 1992 Stochastic backscatter in large-eddy simulation of boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 242, 51–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMillan, O. J. & Ferziger, J. H. 1979 Direct testing of subgrid-scale models. Am. Inst. Aeronaut. Astronaut. J. 17, 1340–1346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meneveau, C. 1994 Statistics of turbulence subgrid-scale stress: necessary conditions and experimental tests. Phys. Fluids 6, 815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moeng, C.-H. 1984 Large-eddy simulation model for the study of planetary boundary-layer turbulence. J. Atmos. Sci. 41, 2052–2062.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nieuwstadt, F. T. M. & de Valk, J. P. J. M. M. 1987 A large eddy simulation of buoyant and non-buoyant plume dispersion in the atmospheric boundary layer. Atmos. Environ. 21, 2573–2587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peltier, L. J., Wyngaard, J. C., Khanna, S. & Brasseur, J. 1996 Spectra in the unstable surface layer. J. Atmos. Sci. 53, 49–61.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piomelli, U. 1993 High Reynolds-number calculations using the dynamic subgrid-scale stress model. Phys. Fluids A 5, 1484–1490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piomelli, U., Moin, P. & Ferziger, J. H. 1988 Model consistency in large eddy simulation of turbulent channel flows. Phys. Fluids 31, 1884–1891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, S. B. 1985 PDF methods for turbulent reacting flows. Prog. Engng Combust. Sci. 11, 119–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, S. B. 2000 Turbulent Flows. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, S. B. & Ching, E. 1993 Stationary probability density function in turbulence. Phys. Fluids A 5, 1529–1531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porté-Agel, F. 2004 A scale-dependent dynamic model for scalar flux transport in large-eddy simulation of the atmospheric surface layer. Bound. Layer Meteorol. 112, 81–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porté-Agel, F., Parlange, M. B., Meneveau, C. & Eichinger, W. E. 2001 A priori field study of the subgrid-scale heat fluxes and dissipation in the atmospheric surface layer. J. Atmos. Sci. 58, 2673–2698.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajagopalan, A. G. & Tong, C. 2003 Experimental investigation of scalar–scalar-dissipation filtered joint density function and its transport equation. Phys. Fluids 15, 227–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabelnikov, V. A. 1998 Asymptotic solution of the equation for the probability distribution of a passive scalar in grid turbulence with a uniform mean scalar gradient. Phys. Fluids 10, 753–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarghini, F., Piomelli, U. & Balaras, E. 1999 Scale-similar models for large-eddy simulations. Phys. Fluids 11, 1596–1607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinai, Y. G. & Yahkot, V. 1989 Limiting probability distribution of a passive scalar in a random velocity field. Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1962–1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smagorinsky, J. 1963 General circulation experiments with the primitive equations. Part I. The basic equations. Mon. Weather Rev. 91, 99–164.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, P. P., Horst, T. W., Lenschow, D. H., Moeng, C.-H. & Weil, J. C. 2003 Structure of subfilter-scale fluxes in the atmospheric surface layer with application to large-eddy simulation modeling. J. Fluid Mech. 482, 101–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, P. P., McWilliams, J. C. & Moeng, C.-H. 1994 A subgrid-scale model for large-eddy simulation of planetary boundary-layer flows. Bound. Layer Meteorol. 71, 247–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tao, B., Katz, J. & Meneveau, C. 2000 Geometry and scale relationships in high Reynolds number turbulence determined from three-dimensional holographic velocimetry. Phys. Fluids 12, 941–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tong, C. 2001 Measurements of conserved scalar filtered density function in a turbulent jet. Phys. Fluids 13, 2923–2937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tong, C., Wyngaard, J. C. & Brasseur, J. G. 1999 Experimental study of subgrid-scale stress in the atmospheric surface layer. J. Atmos. Sci. 56, 2277–2292.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tong, C., Wyngaard, J. C., Khanna, S. & Brasseur, J. G. 1997 Resolvable- and subgrid-scale measurement in the atmospheric surface layer. In 12th Symposium on Boundary Layers and Turbulence, pp. 221–222. American Meteorological Society.Google Scholar
Tong, C., Wyngaard, J. C., Khanna, S. & Brasseur, J. G. 1998 Resolvable- and subgrid-scale measurement in the atmospheric surface layer: technique and issues. J. Atmos. Sci. 55, 3114–3126.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vreman, B., Geurts, B. & Kuerten, H. 1996 Large-eddy simulation of the temporal mixing layer using the Clark model. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 8, 309–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wand, M. P. & Jones, M. C. 1995 Kernel Smoothing. Chapman & Hall/CRC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, D. & Tong, C. 2002 Conditionally filtered scalar dissipation, scalar diffusion, and velocity in a turbulent jet. Phys. Fluids 14, 2170–2185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, D., Tong, C. & Pope, S. B. 2004 Experimental study of velocity filtered joint density function and its transport equation. Phys. Fluids 16, 3599–3613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyngaard, J. C. 1988 Structure of the PBL. In Lectures on Air Pollution Modeling, p. 385. American Meteorological Society.Google Scholar