Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-04T21:40:03.568Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Localised streak solutions for a Blasius boundary layer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 June 2018

Richard E. Hewitt*
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
Peter W. Duck
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
*
Email address for correspondence: richard.e.hewitt@manchester.ac.uk

Abstract

Streaks are a common feature of disturbed boundary-layer flows. They play a central role in transient growth mechanisms and are a building block of self-sustained structures. Most theoretical work has focused on streaks that are periodic in the spanwise direction, but in this work we consider a single spatially localised streak embedded into a Blasius boundary layer. For small streak amplitudes, we show the perturbation can be described in terms of a set of eigenmodes that correspond to an isolated streak/roll structure. These modes are new, and arise from a bi-global eigenvalue calculation; they decay algebraically downstream and may be viewed as the natural three-dimensional extension of the classical two-dimensional Libby & Fox (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 17 (3), 1963, pp. 433–449) solutions. Despite their bi-global nature, we show that a subset of these eigenmodes (including the slowest decaying) is fundamentally related to the solutions first presented by Luchini (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 327, 1996, pp. 101–116), as derived for spanwise-periodic disturbances (at small spanwise wavenumber). This surprising connection is made by an analysis of the far-field decay of the bi-global state. We also address the fully non-parallel downstream development of nonlinear streaks, confirming that the aforementioned eigenmodes are recovered as the streak/roll decays downstream. Encouraging comparisons are made with available experimental data.

Type
JFM Papers
Copyright
© 2018 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amestoy, P. R., Duff, I. S. & L’Excellent, J.-Y. 2000 Multifrontal parallel distributed symmetric and unsymmetric solvers. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engng 184 (2), 501520.Google Scholar
Andersson, P., Berggren, M. & Henningson, D. S. 1999 Optimal disturbances and bypass transition in boundary layers. Phys. Fluids 11 (1), 134150.Google Scholar
Andersson, P., Brandt, L., Bottaro, A. & Henningson, D. S. 2001 On the breakdown of boundary layer streaks. J. Fluid Mech. 428, 2960.Google Scholar
Asai, M., Minagawa, M. & Nishioka, M. 2002 The instability and breakdown of a near-wall low-speed streak. J. Fluid Mech. 455, 289314.Google Scholar
Bakchinov, A. A., Grek, G. R., Klingmann, B. G. B. & Kozlov, V. V. 1995 Transition experiments in a boundary layer with embedded streamwise vortices. Phys. Fluids 7 (4), 820832.Google Scholar
Brandt, L. 2007 Numerical studies of the instability and breakdown of a boundary-layer low-speed streak. Eur. J. Mech. (B/Fluids) 26 (1), 6482.Google Scholar
Brown, S. N. & Stewartson, K. 1965 On similarity solutions of the boundary-layer equations with algebraic decay. J. Fluid Mech. 23 (04), 673687.Google Scholar
Cossu, C. & Brandt, L. 2002 Stabilization of Tollmien–Schlichting waves by finite amplitude optimal streaks in the Blasius boundary layer. Phys. Fluids 14 (8), L57L60.Google Scholar
Dhanak, M. R. & Duck, P. W. 1997 The effects of freestream pressure gradient on a corner boundary layer. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 453 (1964), 17931815.Google Scholar
Goldstein, M. E., Sescu, A., Duck, P. W. & Choudhari, M. 2016 Nonlinear wakes behind a row of elongated roughness elements. J. Fluid Mech. 796, 516557.Google Scholar
Hall, P. 1988 The nonlinear development of Görtler vortices in growing boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 193, 243266.Google Scholar
Hall, P. & Sherwin, S. 2010 Streamwise vortices in shear flows: harbingers of transition and the skeleton of coherent structures. J. Fluid Mech. 661, 178205.Google Scholar
Hernandez, V., Roman, J. E. & Vidal, V. 2005 SLEPc: a scalable and flexible toolkit for the solution of eigenvalue problems. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 31 (3), 351362.Google Scholar
Hewitt, R. E. & Duck, P. W. 2014 Three-dimensional boundary layers with short spanwise scales. J. Fluid Mech. 756, 452469.Google Scholar
Hewitt, R. E., Duck, P. W. & Stow, S. R. 2002 Continua of states in boundary-layer flows. J. Fluid Mech. 468, 121152.Google Scholar
Hewitt, R. E., Duck, P. W. & Williams, A. J. 2017 Injection into boundary layers: solutions beyond the classical form. J. Fluid Mech. 822, 617639.Google Scholar
Higuera, M. & Vega, J. M. 2009 Modal description of internal optimal streaks. J. Fluid Mech. 626, 2131.Google Scholar
Kemp, N. H.1951 The laminar three-dimensional boundary layer and a study of the flow past a side edge. M.Ae.S. thesis, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Libby, P. A. & Fox, H. 1963 Some perturbation solutions in laminar boundary-layer theory. J. Fluid Mech. 17 (3), 433449.Google Scholar
Luchini, P. 1996 Reynolds-number-independent instability of the boundary layer over a flat surface. J. Fluid Mech. 327, 101116.Google Scholar
Luchini, P. 2000 Reynolds-number-independent instability of the boundary layer over a flat surface: optimal perturbations. J. Fluid Mech. 404 (1), 289309.Google Scholar
Rubin, S. G. 1966 Incompressible flow along a corner. J. Fluid Mech. 26, 97110.Google Scholar
Schmid, P. J. & Henningson, D. S. 2012 Stability and Transition in Shear Flows. Springer.Google Scholar
Stewartson, K. 1957 On asymptotic expansions in the theory of boundary layers. Stud. Appl. Math. 36 (1–4), 173191.Google Scholar
White, E. B. 2002 Transient growth of stationary disturbances in a flat plate boundary layer. Phys. Fluids 14 (12), 44294439.Google Scholar
Williams, A. J. & Hewitt, R. E. 2017 Micro-slot injection into a boundary layer driven by a favourable pressure gradient. J. Engng Math. 107 (1), 1935.Google Scholar