Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T01:10:46.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Magnetogasdynamic deflagration and detonation waves with ionization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2006

J. B. Helliwell
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, The Royal College of Science and Technology, Glasgow

Abstract

The propagation of a one-dimensional combustion wave into a non-ionized gas at rest in the presence of an electromagnetic field is considered when ionization of the gas occurs across either the combustion wave or a preceding shock wave. The electric and magnetic fields in the undisturbed gas ahead of the waves are mutually perpendicular and orthogonal to the direction of wave propagation. It is shown that steady detonation occurs at a point which is analogous to the Chapman-Jouguet point of ordinary gasdynamic combustion theory. Numerical calculations are made of the state of the gas between and behind the waves in two particlar models, in both of which the upstream electric field is zero. The models are then equivalent to magnetogasdynamic phenomena in a perfectly conducting gas. First, the case of steady detonation is studied. Secondly, steady deflagration in a tube, closed at one end, is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1963 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, G. K. & Pack, D. C. 1959 Proceedings of the Seventh Symposium on Combustion. London: Butterworth.
Courant, R. & Friedrichs, K.O. 1948 Supersonic Flow and Shock Waves. New York: Interscience.
Gross, R. A., Chinitz, W. & Rivlin, T. J. 1960 J. Aero/Space Sci. 27, 283.
Helliwell, J. B. 1962 J. Fluid Mech. 14, 405.
Lyubimov, G. A. & Kulikovsky, A. G. 1960 Rev. Mod. Phys. 32, 977.
Zhilin, Iu. L. 1960 J. App. Math. Mech. 24, 794 (translation of Prikl. Mat. Mekh. 24, 543).