Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T21:09:18.796Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measurements of the fluctuating pressure at the wall beneath a thick turbulent boundary layer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2006

W. W. Willmarth  and
C. E. Wooldridge
W. W. Willmarth
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering, The University of Michigan
C. E. Wooldridge
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering, The University of Michigan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Measurements of the turbulent pressure field at the wall beneath a thick (5-inch) turbulent boundary layer produced by natural transition on a smooth surface are reported. The data include the mean-square pressure, parallel to the stream, and spatial correlation of the pressure transverse to the stream.

The root-mean-square wall pressure was 2.19 times the wall shear stress. The power spectra of the pressure were found to scale with the free-stream speed and the boundary-layer displacement thickness. A few tests with a rough surface showed that the increase in root-mean-square wall pressure was greater than the increase in wall shear stress.

The space-time correlation measurements parallel to the stream direction exhibit maxima at certain time delays corresponding to the convection of pressure-producing eddies at speeds varying from 0.56 to 0.83 times the stream speed. The lower convection speeds are measured when the spatial separation of the pressure transducers is small, or when only the pressure fluctuations at high frequencies are correlated. Higher convection speeds are observed when the spatial separation of the pressure transducers is large, or when only low frequencies are correlated. The result that low-frequency pressure fluctuations have the highest convection speed is in agreement with the measurements of Corcos (1959, 1962) in a fully turbulent tube flow. Analysis of these measurements also shows that both large- and small-scale pressure-producing eddies decay after travelling a distance proportional to their scale. More precisely, a pressure-producing eddy of large or small wavelength λ decays and vanishes after travelling a distance of approximately 6λ.

The transverse spatial correlation of the wall-pressure fluctuations was measured and compared with the longitudinal scale. Both the transverse and the longitudinal scale of the pressure fluctuations were of the order of the boundary-layer displacement thickness. The transverse and longitudinal scales of both large- and small-scale wall-pressure fluctuations were also measured and were also found to be approximately the same.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , October 1962 , pp. 187 - 210
Copyright
© 1962 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batchelor, G. K. 1950 Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 47, 359.
Bradshaw, P. & Gregory, N. 1961 Aero. Res. Counc., Lond., Rep. & Mem. no. 3202.
Bull, M. K. 1960 Dept. Aero. Astro., Univ. of Southampton, Rep. no. 149.
Bull, M. K. & Willis, J. L. 1961 Dept. Aero. Astro., Univ. of Southampton, Rep. no. 199.
Coles, D. 1953 Jet Propulsion Lab., Calif. Inst. Tech., Rep. no. 20-69; or 1954 Z.A.M.P. 5, 181.
Corcos, G. M. 1959 Amer. Phys. Soc., Div. of Fluid Dynamics, Abstracts.
Corcos, G. M. 1962 Univ. of Calif., Inst. of Eng. Res. Rep., Series 183, no. 1.
Favre, A. J., Gaviglio, J. J. & Dumas, R. 1957 J. Fluid Mech. 2, 313.
Harrison, M. 1958 Hydro. Lab., David Taylor Model Basin, Rep. no. 1260.
Kraichnan, R. H. 1956a J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 28, 64.
Kraichnan, R. H. 1956b J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 28, 378.
Laufer, J. 1961 Jet Propulsion Lab., Calif. Inst. Tech., Tech. Rep. pp. 32–119.
Lilley, G. M. & Hodgson, T. H. 1960 AGARD Rep. no. 276.
Phillips, O. M. 1957 J. Fluid Mech. 2, 417.
Skudrzyk, E. J. & Haddle, G. P. 1960 J. Acous. Soc. Amer 32, 19.
Uberoi, M. S. 1953 J. Aero. Sci. 20, 197.
Willmarth, W. W. 1958a J. Aero. Sci. 25, 335.
Willmarth, W. W. 1958b Rev. Sci. Inst. 29, 218.
Willmarth, W. W. 1959 NASA Mem. 3-17-59W.