Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T13:18:16.404Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Microbubbly drag reduction in Taylor–Couette flow in the wavy vortex regime

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2008

KAZUYASU SUGIYAMA ,
ENRICO CALZAVARINI  and
DETLEF LOHSE
KAZUYASU SUGIYAMA
Affiliation:
Physics of Fluids Group, Department of Applied Physics, J. M. Burgers Centre for Fluid Dynamics, and Impact-, MESA-, and BMTI-Institutes, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlandsd.lohse@utwente.nl
ENRICO CALZAVARINI
Affiliation:
Physics of Fluids Group, Department of Applied Physics, J. M. Burgers Centre for Fluid Dynamics, and Impact-, MESA-, and BMTI-Institutes, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlandsd.lohse@utwente.nl
DETLEF LOHSE
Affiliation:
Physics of Fluids Group, Department of Applied Physics, J. M. Burgers Centre for Fluid Dynamics, and Impact-, MESA-, and BMTI-Institutes, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlandsd.lohse@utwente.nl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We investigate the effect of microbubbles on Taylor–Couette flow by means of direct numerical simulations. We employ an Eulerian–Lagrangian approach with a gas–fluid coupling based on the point-force approximation. Added mass, drag, lift and gravity are taken into account in the modelling of the motion of the individual bubble. We find that very dilute suspensions of small non-deformable bubbles (volume void fraction below 1%, zero Weber number and bubble Reynolds number ≲10) induce a robust statistically steady drag reduction (up to 20%) in the wavy vortex flow regime (Re=600–2500). The Reynolds number dependence of the normalized torque (the so-called torque reduction ratio (TRR) which corresponds to the drag reduction) is consistent with a recent series of experimental measurements performed by Murai et al. (J. Phys. Conf. Ser. vol. 14, 2005, p. 143). Our analysis suggests that the physical mechanism for the torque reduction in this regime is due to the local axial forcing, induced by rising bubbles, that is able to break the highly dissipative Taylor wavy vortices in the system. We finally show that the lift force acting on the bubble is crucial in this process. When it is neglected, the bubbles preferentially accumulate near the inner cylinder and the bulk flow is less efficiently modified. Movies are available with the online version of the paper.

JFM classification

Flow Control: Drag reduction Instability: Taylor-Couette flow
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 608 , 10 August 2008 , pp. 21 - 41
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andereck, C. D., Liu, S. S. & Swinney, H. L. 1986 Flow regimes in a circular Couette system with independently rotating cylinders. J. Fluid Mech. 164, 155–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auton, T. R. 1987 The lift force on a spherical body in a rotational flow. J. Fluid Mech. 183, 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auton, T. R., Hunt, J. C. R. & Prud'homme, M. 1988 The force exerted on a body in inviscid unsteady non-uniform rotational flow. J. Fluid Mech. 197, 241–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van den Berg, T. H., van Gils, D. P. M., Lathrop, D. P. & Lohse, D. 2007 Bubbly turbulent drag reduction is a boundary layer effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 084501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van den Berg, T. H., Luther, S., Lathrop, D. P. & Lohse, D. 2005 Drag reduction in bubbly Taylor–Couette turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 044501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van den Berg, T. H., Luther, S. & Lohse, D. 2006 Energy spectra in microbubbly turbulence. Phys. Fluids 18, 038103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunner, B. & Tryggvason, G. 2002 Dynamics of homogeneous bubbly flows Part 1. Rise velocity and microstructure of the bubbles. J. Fluid Mech. 466, 17–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calzavarini, E., van den Berg, T., Toschi, F. & Lohse, D. 2008 Quantifying microbubble clustering in turbulent flow from sigle-point measurements. Phys. Fluids 20, 040702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandrasekhar, S. 1961 Hydrodynamic and Hydromagnetic Stability. Clarendon.Google Scholar
Climent, E. & Magnaudet, J. 1999 Large-scale simulations of bubble-induced convection in a liquid layer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4827–4830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Climent, E., Simonnet, M. & Magnaudet, J. 2007 Preferential accumulation of bubbles in Couette-Taylor flow patterns. Phys. Fluids 19, 083301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djeridi, H., Gabillet, C. & Billard, J. Y. 2004 Two-phase Couette–Taylor flow: Arrangement of the dispersed phase and effects on the flow structures. Phys. Fluids 16, 128–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dominguez-Lerma, M. A., Ahlers, G. & Cannell, D. 1984 Marginal stability curve and linear growth rate for rotating Couette–Taylor flow and Rayleigh–Bénard convection. Phys. Fluids 27, 856–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutcher, C. S. & Muller, S. J. 2007 Explicit analytic formulas for Newtonian Taylor–Couette primary instabilities. Phys. Rev. E 75, 047301.Google ScholarPubMed
Eckhardt, B., Grossmann, S. & Lohse, D. 2000 Scaling of global momentum transport in Taylor–Couette and pipe flow. Eur. Phys. J. B 18, 541–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckhardt, B., Grossmann, S. & Lohse, D. 2007 Torque scaling in turbulent Taylor–Couette flow between independently rotating cylinders. J. Fluid Mech 581, 221–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esser, A. & Grossmann, S. 1996 Analytic expression for Taylor–Couette stability boundary. Phys. Fluids 8, 1814–1819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrante, A. & Elghobashi, S. 2004 On the physical mechanisms of drag reduction in a spatially-developing turbulent boundary layer laden with microbubbles. J. Fluid Mech. 503, 345–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukagata, K., Iwamoto, K. & Kasagi, N. 2002 Contribution of Reynolds stress distribution to the skin friction in wall-bounded flows. Phys. Fluids 14, L73–L76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukagata, K. & Kasagi, N. 2002 Highly energy-conservative finite difference method for the cylindrical coordinate system. J. Comput. Phys. 181, 478–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grace, J. 1973 Shapes and velocities of bubbles rising in infinite liquids. Trans. Inst. Chem. Engrs 51, 116–120.Google Scholar
Happel, J. & Brenner, H. 1973 Low Reynolds Number Hydrodynamics, 2nd Edn. Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Hunt, J. C. R., Wray, A. A. & Moin, P. 1988 Eddies, stream and convergence zones in turbulent flows. Report CTR-S88. Center for Turbulence Research, NASA Ames Research Center and Stanford University, California, USA.Google Scholar
Lathrop, D. P., Fineberg, J. & Swinney, H. L. 1992 Transition to shear-driven turbulence in Couette–Taylor flow. Phys. Rev. A 46, 6390–6405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lim, T. T. & Tan, K. S. 2004 A note on power-law scaling in a Taylor–Couette flow. Phys. Fluids 16, 140–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lo, T. S., L'vov, V. S. & Procaccia, I. 2006 Drag reduction by compressible bubbles. Phys. Rev. E 73, 036308.Google ScholarPubMed
Lu, J., Fernández, A. & Tryggvason, G. 2005 The effect of bubbles on the wall drag in a turbulent channel flow. Phys. Fluids 17, 095102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
L'vov, V. S., Pomyalov, A., Procaccia, I. & Tiberkevich, V. 2005 Drag reduction by microbubbles in turbulent flows: The limit of minute bubbles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 174502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Madavan, N. K., Deutsch, S. & Merkle, C. L. 1984 Reduction of turbulent skin friction by microbubbles. Phys. Fluids 27, 356–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnaudet, J. & Legendre, D. 1998 Some aspects of the lift force on a spherical bubble. Appl. Sci. Res. 58, 441–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxey, M. R. & Riley, J. J. 1983 Equation of motion for a small rigid sphere in a nonuniform flow. Phys. Fluids 26, 883–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazzitelli, I. M., Lohse, D. & Toschi, F. 2003 a On the relevance of the lift force in bubbly turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 488, 283–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazzitelli, I. M., Lohse, D. & Toschi, F. 2003 b The effect of microbubbles on developed turbulence. Phys. Fluids 15, L5–L8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meng, J. C. S. & Uhlman, J. S. 1998 Microbubble formation and splitting in a turbulent boundary layer for turbulence reduction. Proc. Intl Symp. on Seawater Drag Reduction, Newport, RI, July, US Office of Naval Research, Arlington, VA, pp. 341–355.Google Scholar
Murai, Y., Oiwa, H. & Takeda, Y. 2005 Bubble behavior in a vertical Taylor–Couette flow. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 14, 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
vanNierop, E. A. Nierop, E. A., Luther, S., Bluemink, J. J., Magnaudet, J., Prosperetti, A. & Lohse, D. 2007 Drag and lift forces on bubbles in a rotating flow. J. Fluid Mech. 571, 439–454.Google Scholar
Oiwa, H. 2005 A study of mechanisms modifying shear stress in bubbly flow. Doctoral Thesis, Fukui University, Japan.Google Scholar
Sanders, W. C., Winkel, E. S., Dowling, D. R., Perlin, M. & Ceccio, S. L. 2006 Bubble friction drag reduction in a high-Reynolds-number flat-plate turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 552, 353–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sbragaglia, M. & Sugiyama, K. 2007 Boundary induced nonlinearities at small Reynolds numbers. Physica D 228, 140–147.Google Scholar
Serizawa, A., Kataoka, I. & Michiyoshi, I. 1975 Turbulence structure of air-water bubbly flow – II. Local properties. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 2, 235–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiomi, Y., Kutsuma, H., Akagawa, K. & Ozawa, M. 1993 Two-phase flow in an annulus with a rotating inner cylinder (flow pattern in bubbly flow region). Nucl. Engng Des. 141, 27–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanahashi, M., Iwase, S. & Miyauchi, T. 2001 Appearance and alignment with strain rate of coherent fine scale eddies in turbulent mixing layer. J. Turb. 2, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, G. I. 1923 Stability of a viscous liquid contained between two rotating cylinders. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 223, 289–343.Google Scholar
Wang, L. P. & Maxey, M. R. 1993 The motion of microbubbles in a forced isotropic and homogeneous turbulence. Appl. Sci. Res. 51, 291–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, F. 1933 Turbulente Strömungen zwischen zwei rotierenden konaxialen Zylindern. Ing.-Arch. 4, 577–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, J., Maxey, M. R. & Karniadakis, G. E. M. 2002 Numerical simulation of turbulent drag reduction using micro-bubbles. J. Fluid Mech. 468, 271–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zenit, R., Koch, D. L. & Sangani, A. S. 2001 Measurements of the average properties of a suspension of bubbles rising in a vertical channel. J. Fluid Mech. 429, 307–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sugiyama et al. supplementary movie

Movie 1. Flow visualization at Re = 900: single-phase flow (left) and two-phase flow of liquid plus bubbles (right). The Taylor vortex structures are identified by iso-surfaces of the Laplacian of pressure, and uniformly coloured (white and violet) according to the sign of the azimuthal vorticity on the surfaces. The wall shear stress is reproduced in colour on the inner cylinder surface.

Download Sugiyama et al. supplementary movie(Video)
Video 4.2 MB

Sugiyama et al. supplementary movie

Movie 2. Flow visualization at Re = 900: single-phase flow (left) and two-phase flow of liquid plus bubbles (right). The Taylor vortex structures are identified by iso-surfaces of the Laplacian of pressure, and uniformly coloured (white and violet) according to the sign of the azimuthal vorticity on the surfaces. The wall shear stress is reproduced in colour on the inner cylinder surface.

Download Sugiyama et al. supplementary movie(Video)
Video 4.4 MB

Sugiyama et al. supplementary movie

Movie 3. Flow visualization at Re = 2000: single-phase flow (left) and two-phase flow of liquid plus bubbles (right). The Taylor vortex structures are identified by iso-surfaces of the Laplacian of pressure, and uniformly coloured (white and violet) according to the sign of the azimuthal vorticity on the surfaces. The wall shear stress is reproduced in colour on the inner cylinder surface.

Download Sugiyama et al. supplementary movie(Video)
Video 4.5 MB

Sugiyama et al. supplementary movie

Movie 4. Flow visualization at Re = 2000: single-phase flow (left) and two-phase flow of liquid plus bubbles (right). The Taylor vortex structures are identified by iso-surfaces of the Laplacian of pressure, and uniformly coloured (white and violet) according to the sign of the azimuthal vorticity on the surfaces. The wall shear stress is reproduced in colour on the inner cylinder surface.

Download Sugiyama et al. supplementary movie(Video)
Video 4.7 MB