Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-02T02:06:17.044Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Motion of a non-axisymmetric particle in viscous shear flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2019

Ian R. Thorp*
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 0WA, UK
John R. Lister
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 0WA, UK
*
Email address for correspondence: irt25@damtp.cam.ac.uk

Abstract

We examine the motion in a shear flow at zero Reynolds number of particles with two planes of symmetry. We show that in most cases the rotational motion is qualitatively similar to that of a non-axisymmetric ellipsoid, and characterised by a combination of chaotic and quasiperiodic orbits. We use Kolmogorov–Arnold–Moser (KAM) theory and related ideas in dynamical systems to elucidate the underlying mathematical structure of the motion and thence to explain why such a large class of particles all rotate in essentially the same manner. Numerical simulations are presented for curved spheroids of varying centreline curvature, which are found to drift persistently across the streamlines of the flow for certain initial orientations. We explain the origin of this migration as the result of a lack of symmetries of the particle’s orientation orbit.

Type
JFM Papers
Copyright
© 2019 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Borker, N. S., Stroock, A. D. & Koch, D. L. 2018 Controlling rotation and migration of rings in a simple shear flow through geometric modifications. J. Fluid Mech. 840, 379407.Google Scholar
Bretherton, F. P. 1962 The motion of rigid particles in a shear flow at low Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 14, 284304.Google Scholar
Goldstein, H., Poole, C. P. & Safko, J. L. 2001 Classical Mechanics. Addison–Wesley.Google Scholar
Gradshteyn, I. S. & Ryzhik, I. M. 2007 Table of Integrals, Series, and Products. Academic.Google Scholar
Greene, J. M. 1979 A method for determining a stochastic transition. J. Math. Phys. 20, 11831201.Google Scholar
Hinch, E. J. & Leal, L. G. 1979 Rotation of small non-axisymmetric particles in a simple shear flow. J. Fluid. Mech. 92, 591608.Google Scholar
Jeffery, G. B. 1922 The motion of ellipsoidal particles immersed in viscous fluid. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 102, 161179.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. E. 1980 An improved slender-body theory for Stokes flow. J. Fluid Mech. 99, 411431.Google Scholar
Kim, S. & Karrila, S. J. 1991 Microhydrodynamics: Principles and Selected Applications. Butterworth–Heinemann.Google Scholar
Mackay, R. S. & Percival, I. C. 1985 Converse KAM: theory and practice. Commun. Math. Phys. 98, 469512.Google Scholar
Moser, J. 1968 Lectures on Hamiltonian systems. Mem. Am. Math. Soc. 81, 160.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. A. G. & Quispel, G. R. W. 1992 Chaos and time-reversal symmetry. Order and chaos in reversible dynamical systems. Phys. Rep. 216, 63177.Google Scholar
Wang, J., Tozzi, E. J., Graham, M. D. & Klingenberg, D. J. 2012 Flipping, scooping, and spinning: drift of rigid curved nonchiral fibers in simple shear flow. Phys. Fluids 24, 123304.Google Scholar
Yarin, A. L., Gottlieb, O. & Roisman, I. V. 1997 Chaotic rotation of triaxial ellipsoids in simple shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 340, 83100.Google Scholar