Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T08:22:49.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the spreading of impacting drops

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 September 2016

Sander Wildeman ,
Claas Willem Visser ,
Chao Sun  and
Detlef Lohse
Sander Wildeman*
Affiliation:
Physics of Fluids group, MESA$+$ Institute and J. M. Burgers Centre for Fluid Dynamics, University of Twente, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands
Claas Willem Visser
Affiliation:
Physics of Fluids group, MESA$+$ Institute and J. M. Burgers Centre for Fluid Dynamics, University of Twente, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands
Chao Sun
Affiliation:
Physics of Fluids group, MESA$+$ Institute and J. M. Burgers Centre for Fluid Dynamics, University of Twente, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands Center for Combustion Energy and Department of Thermal Engineering, Tsinghua University, 100084 Beijing, China
Detlef Lohse
Affiliation:
Physics of Fluids group, MESA$+$ Institute and J. M. Burgers Centre for Fluid Dynamics, University of Twente, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization, 37077, Göttingen, Germany
*
†Email address for correspondence: swildeman@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The energy budget and dissipation mechanisms during droplet impact on solid surfaces are studied numerically and theoretically. We find that for high impact velocities and negligible surface friction at the solid surface (i.e. free slip), approximately one-half of the initial kinetic energy is transformed into surface energy, independent of the impact parameters and the detailed energy loss mechanism(s). We argue that this seemingly universal rule is related to the deformation mode of the droplet and is reminiscent of pipe flow undergoing a sudden expansion, for which the head loss can be calculated by multiplying the kinetic energy of the incoming flow by a geometrical factor. For impacts on a no-slip surface also dissipation in the shear boundary layer at the solid surface is important. In this case the geometric head loss acts as a lower bound on the total dissipation (i.e. the spreading on a no-slip surface approaches that on a free-slip surface when the droplet viscosity is sent to zero). This new view on the impact problem allows for simple analytical estimates of the maximum spreading diameter of impacting drops as a function of the impact parameters and the properties of the solid surface. It bridges the gap between previous momentum balance approaches and energy balance approaches, which hitherto did not give consistent predictions in the low viscosity limit. Good agreement is found between our models and experiments, both for impacts on ‘slippery’ or lubricated surfaces (e.g. Leidenfrost droplet impacts and head-on droplet–droplet collisions) and for impacts on no-slip surfaces.

JFM classification

Drops and Bubbles: Drops Drops and Bubbles: Drops and Bubbles Interfacial Flows (free surface): Interfacial Flows (free surface)
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 805 , 25 October 2016 , pp. 636 - 655
Check for updates
Copyright
© 2016 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Antonini, C., Amirfazli, A. & Marengo, M. 2012 Drop impact and wettability: from hydrophilic to superhydrophobic surfaces. Phys. Fluids 24, 102104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attané, P., Girard, F. & Morin, V. 2007 An energy balance approach of the dynamics of drop impact on a solid surface. Phys. Fluids 19, 012101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aziz, S. D. & Chandra, S. 2000 Impact, recoil and splashing of molten metal droplets. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 43 (16), 2841–2857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartolo, D., Josserand, C. & Bonn, D. 2006 Singular jets and bubbles in drop impact. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 124501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Batchelor, G. K. 1967 An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blossey, R. 2003 Self-cleaning surfaces virtual realities. Nat. Mater. 2, 301–306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyer, F., Sandoval-Nava, E., Snoeijer, J. H., Dijksman, J. F. & Lohse, D. 2016 Drop impact of shear thickening liquids. Phys. Rev. Fluids 1, 013901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandra, S. & Avedisian, C. T. 1991 On the collision of a droplet with a solid surface. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 432 (1884), 13–41.Google Scholar
Clanet, C., Béguin, C., Richard, D. & Quéré, D. 2004 Maximal deformation of an impacting drop. J. Fluid Mech. 517, 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culick, F. E. C. 1960 Comments on a ruptured soap film. J. Appl. Phys. 31 (6), 1128–1129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Ruiter, J., Lagraauw, R., Van den Ende, D. & Mugele, F. 2014 Wettability-independent bouncing on flat surfaces mediated by thin air films. Nat. Phys. 11 (1), 48–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggers, J., Fontelos, M. A., Josserand, C. & Zaleski, S. 2010 Drop dynamics after impact on a solid wall: theory and simulations. Phys. Fluids 22 (6), 062101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, Y. J., Umemura, A. & Law, C. K. 1992 An experimental investigation on the collision behaviour of hydrocarbon droplets. J. Fluid Mech. 234, 171–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Josserand, C. & Thoroddsen, S. T. 2016 Drop impact on solid surface. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 48 (1), 365–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. 2007 Spray cooling heat transfer: the state of the art. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 28, 753–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laan, N., De Bruin, K. G., Bartolo, D., Josserand, C. & Bonn, D. 2014 Maximum diameter of impacting liquid droplets. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2 (4), 044018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lagubeau, G., Fontelos, M. A., Josserand, C., Maurel, A., Pagneux, V. & Petitjeans, P. 2012 Spreading dynamics of drop impacts. J. Fluid Mech. 713, 50–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lastakowski, H., Boyer, F., Biance, A.-L., Pirat, C. & Ybert, C. 2014 Bridging local to global dynamics of drop impact onto solid substrates. J. Fluid Mech. 747, 103–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J. B., Derome, D., Guyer, R. & J., Carmeliet 2016 Modelling the maximum spreading of liquid droplets impacting wetting and non-wetting surfaces. Langmuir 32 (5), 1299–1308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marengo, M., Antonini, C., Roisman, I. V. & Tropea, C. 2011 Drop collisions with simple and complex surfaces. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 16 (4), 292–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishchenko, L., Hatton, B., Bahadur, V., Taylor, J. A., Krupenkin, T. & Aizenberg, J. 2010 Design of ice-free nanostructured impacting water droplets. ACS Nano 4 (12), 7699–7707.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Okumura, K., Chevy, F., Richard, D., Quéré, D. & Clanet, C. 2003 Water spring: a model for bouncing drops. Europhys. Lett. 62 (2), 237–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasandideh-Fard, M., Qiao, Y. M., Chandra, S. & Mostaghimi, J. 1996 Capillary effects during droplet impact on a solid surface. Phys. Fluids 8 (3), 650–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popinet, S. 2003 Gerris: a tree-based adaptive solver for the incompressible Euler equations in complex geometries. J. Comput. Phys. 190 (July), 572–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popinet, S. 2009 An accurate adaptive solver for surface-tension-driven interfacial flows. J. Comput. Phys. 228 (16), 5838–5866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quéré, D. 2013 Leidenfrost dynamics. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 45, 197–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rein, M. 1993 Phenomena of liquid drop impact on solid and liquid surfaces. Fluid Dyn. Res. 12 (2), 61–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renardy, Y., Popinet, S., Duchemin, L., Renardy, M., Zaleski, S., Josserand, C., Drumright-Clarke, M. A., Richard, D., Clanet, C. & Quéré, D. 2003 Pyramidal and toroidal water drops after impact on a solid surface. J. Fluid Mech. 484, 69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richard, D. & Quéré, D. 2000 Bouncing water drops. Europhys. Lett. 50 (6), 769–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rioboo, R., Marengo, M. & Tropea, C. 2002 Time evolution of liquid drop impact onto solid, dry surfaces. Exp. Fluids 33 (1), 112–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roisman, I. V. 2009 Inertia dominated drop collisions. II. An analytical solution of the Navier–Stokes equations for a spreading viscous film. Phys. Fluids 21 (5), 052104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roisman, I. V., Berberovi, E. & Tropea, C. 2009 Inertia dominated drop collisions. I. On the universal flow in the lamella. Phys. Fluids 21 (5), 052103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roisman, I. V., Planchette, C., Lorenceau, E. & Brenn, G. 2012 Binary collisions of drops of immiscible liquids. J. Fluid Mech. 690, 512–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savva, N. & Bush, J. W. M. 2009 Viscous sheet retraction. J. Fluid Mech. 626 (2009), 211–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stow, C. D. & Hadfield, M. G. 1981 An experimental investigation of fluid flow resulting from the impact of a water drop with an unyielding dry surface. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 373 (1755), 419–441.Google Scholar
Sünderhauf, G., Raszillier, H. & Durst, F. 2002 The retraction of the edge of a planar liquid sheet. Phys. Fluids 14 (1), 198–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, G. 1959 The dynamics of thin sheets of fluid. III. Disintegration of fluid sheets. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 253 (1274), 313–321.Google Scholar
Thoraval, M.-J., Takehara, K., Etoh, T. G., Popinet, S., Ray, P., Josserand, C., Zaleski, S. & Thoroddsen, S. T. 2012 von Kármán vortex street within an impacting drop. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (26), 264506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thoraval, M.-J., Takehara, K., Etoh, T. G. & Thoroddsen, S. T. 2013 Drop impact entrapment of bubble rings. J. Fluid Mech. 724, 234–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thoroddsen, S. T., Etoh, T. G. & Takehara, K. 2008 High-speed imaging of drops and bubbles. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 40, 257–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thoroddsen, S. T., Etoh, T. G., Takehara, K., Ootsuka, N. & Hatsuki, Y. 2005 The air bubble entrapped under a drop impacting on a solid surface. J. Fluid Mech. 545, 203–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tran, T., Staat, H. J. J., Prosperetti, A., Sun, C. & Lohse, D. 2012 Drop impact on superheated surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (3), 036101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ukiwe, C. & Kwok, D. Y. 2005 On the maximum spreading diameter of impacting droplets on well-prepared solid surfaces. Langmuir 21 (31), 666–673.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Dam, D. B. & Le Clerc, C. 2004 Experimental study of the impact of an ink-jet printed droplet on a solid substrate. Phys. Fluids 16 (9), 3403–3414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villermaux, E. & Bossa, B. 2011 Drop fragmentation on impact. J. Fluid Mech. 668, 412–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visser, C., Frommhold, P. E., Wildeman, S., Mettin, R., Lohse, D. & Sun, C. 2015 Dynamics of high-speed micro-drop impact: numerical simulations and experiments at frame-to-frame times below 100 ns. Soft Matt. 11, 1708–1722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Šikalo, Š., Wilhelm, H.-D., Roisman, I. V., Jakirlić, S. & Tropea, C. 2005 Dynamic contact angle of spreading droplets: experiments and simulations. Phys. Fluids 17 (2005), 062103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willis, K. & Orme, M. 2003 Binary droplet collisions in a vacuum environment: an experimental investigation of the role of viscosity. Exp. Fluids 34 (1), 28–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yarin, A. L. 2006 Drop impact dynamics: splashing, spreading, receding, bouncing…. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 38, 159–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar