Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-23T02:02:37.059Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On unsteady reacting flow in a channel with a cavity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

Ivar ØYvind Sand
Affiliation:
Chr. Michelsen Institute, Department of Science and Technology, N-5036 Fantoft, Bergen, Norway

Abstract

The problem investigated is the stability of a flame anchored by recirculation within a channel with a cavity, acting as a two-dimensional approximation to a gas turbine combustion chamber. This is related to experiments of Vaneveld, Hom & Oppenheim (1982). The hypothesis studied is that hydrodynamic oscillations within the cavity can lead to flashback.

The method used is a semi-analytical-numerical technique where the conservation equations for enthalpy and fuel fraction are represented by the low-Mach-number combustion model of Ghoniem, Chorin & Oppenheim (1982). Burnt and unburnt gas are treated as incompressible fluids where the reaction zone acts as a source for volume expansion. The flame is modelled by a Lagrangian technique using a simple line interface calculation algorithm.

The turbulent flow field is determined using conformal mapping theory and the hybrid random vortex method. The vorticity generation takes place at the walls to achieve no slip, and is influenced by boundary-layer separation. To avoid locating the separation points a priori the numerical viscous sublayer is extended continuously past the corners, and their singularities are in effect cut off by using locally a corner rounding technique within the conformal mapping.

The computed unsteady boundary-layer separation and reattachment of the non-reacting flow field agrees with unsteady boundary-layer theory. On the basis of the numerical simulations of the flame stability problem it is concluded that hydrodynamic oscillations within the cavity, combined with unsteady boundary-layer separation and reattachment can cause a flashback.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1991 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burelbach, J. P., Davis, S. H. & Bankoff, S. G. 1988 Nonlinear stability of evaporating/condensing liquid films. J. Fluid Mech. 195, 463.Google Scholar
Cazabat, A. M. & Cohen Stuart, M. A. 1986 Dynamics of wetting: effects of surface roughness. J. Phys. Chem. 90, 5845.Google Scholar
Chen, J.-D. 1988 Experiments on a spreading drop and its contact angle on a solid. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 122, 60.Google Scholar
Davis, S. H. 1980 Moving contact lines and rivulet instabilities. Part 1. The static rivulet. J. Fluid Mech. 98, 225.Google Scholar
Davis, S. H. 1983 Contact-line problems in fluid mechanics. Trans. ASME E: J. Appl. Mech. 50, 977.Google Scholar
Dussan V. E. B. 1976 The moving contact line: the slip boundary condition. J. Fluid Mech. 77, 665.Google Scholar
Dussan V. E. B. 1979 On the spreading of liquids on solid surfaces: static and dynamic contact lines. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 11, 371.Google Scholar
Dussan V. E. B. 1987 On the ability of drops to stick to surfaces of solids. Part 3. The influences of the motion of the surrounding fluid on dislodging drops. J. Fluid Mech. 174, 81.Google Scholar
Dussan V. E. B. & Davis, S. H. 1974 On the motion of a fluid-fluid interface along a solid surface. J. Fluid Mech. 65, 71.Google Scholar
Gennes, P. G. De 1985 Wetting: statics and dynamics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 57, 827.Google Scholar
Greenspan, H. P. 1978 On the motion of a small viscous droplet that wets a surface. J. Fluid Mech. 84, 125.Google Scholar
Haley, P. J. & Miksis, M. J. 1991 The effects of the contact line on droplet spreading. J. Fluid Mech. 223, 57.Google Scholar
Hocking, L. M. 1977 A moving fluid interface. Part 2. The removal of the force singularity by a slip flow. J. Fluid Mech. 79, 209.Google Scholar
Hocking, L. M. 1981 Sliding and spreading of thin two-dimensional drops. Q. J. Mech. Appl. Maths. 34, 37.Google Scholar
Hocking, L. M. 1983 The spreading of thin drops by gravity and capillarity. Q. J. Mech. Appl. Maths. 36, 55.Google Scholar
Hocking, L. M. & Rivers, A. D. 1982 The spreading of a drop by capillary action. J. Fluid Mech. 121, 425.Google Scholar
Hoffman, R. L. 1975 A study of the advancing interface. I. Interface shape in liquid-gas systems, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 50, 228.Google Scholar
Lopez, J., Miller, C. A. & Ruckenstein, E. 1976 Spreading kinetics of liquid drops on solids. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 56, 460.Google Scholar
Ngan, C. G. & Dussan V. E. B. 1989 On the dynamics of liquid spreading on solid surfaces. J. Fluid Mech. 209, 191.Google Scholar
Rosenblat, S. & Davis, S. H. 1985 How do liquid drops spread on solids? In Frontiers in Fluid Mechanics (ed. S. H. Davis & J. L. Lumley), p. 171. Springer.
Schwartz, A. M. & Tejeda, S. B. 1972 Studies of dynamic contact angles on solids. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 38, 359.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. & Davis, S. H. 1982 Steady thermocapillary flows in two-dimensional slots. J. Fluid Mech. 121, 163.Google Scholar
Starov, V. M. 1983 Spreading of droplets of nonvolatile liquids over a flat surface. Colloid J. USSR (Eng. transl.) 45, 1009.Google Scholar
Tanner, L. H. 1979 The spreading of silicone oil on horizontal surfaces. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 12, 1473.Google Scholar
Yiantsios, S. G. & Higgins, B. G. 1989 Rayleigh-Taylor instability in thin viscous films.. Phys. Fluids A 1, 1484.Google Scholar