Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-wlg5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T11:20:26.292Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Optimal control of dissimilar heat and momentum transfer in a fully developed turbulent channel flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 September 2013

A. Yamamoto ,
Y. Hasegawa  and
N. Kasagi
A. Yamamoto
Affiliation:
Toshiba Corporation Power Systems Company, 2-4, Suehiro-Cho Tsurumi-Ku, Yokohama 230-0045, Japan
Y. Hasegawa*
Affiliation:
Institute of Industrial Science, The University of Tokyo, Komaba 4-6-1, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8505, Japan
N. Kasagi
Affiliation:
Center of Research and Development Strategy, Japan Science and Technology Agency, K’s Gobancyo, 7, Gobancho Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 102-0076, Japan
*
†Email address for correspondence: ysk@iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sustained friction drag reduction and heat transfer augmentation are simultaneously achieved in a fully developed channel flow where the averaged transport equations and wall boundary conditions for momentum and heat have identical form. Zero-net-mass-flux wall blowing and suction is assumed as a control input and its spatio-temporal distribution is determined based on optimal control theory. When the root-mean-square value of the control input is 5 % of the bulk mean velocity, the friction drag is decreased by 24 % from the uncontrolled value, whereas the heat transfer is more than doubled. Optimizations with different amplitudes of the control input and different Reynolds numbers reveal that the optimal control inputs commonly exhibit the property of a downstream travelling wave, whose wavelength is ∼250 in wall units and phase velocity is ∼30 % of the bulk mean velocity. Detailed analyses of the controlled velocity and thermal fields show that the travelling wave input contributes to dissimilar heat transfer enhancement through two distinct mechanisms, i.e. direct modification of the coherent velocity and thermal fields and an indirect effect on the random fields. The present results show that the divergence-free velocity vector and the conservative scalar are essentially different, and this is a key to achieving dissimilar heat transfer enhancement in turbulent shear flows.

JFM classification

Flow Control: Control theory Flow Control: Drag reduction Flow Control: Mixing enhancement

Information

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 733 , 25 October 2013 , pp. 189 - 220
Copyright
©2013 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abergel, F. & Temam, R. 1990 On some control problems in fluid mechanics. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 1, 303–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antonia, R. A. & Krishnamoorthy, L. V. 1988 Correlation between the longitudinal velocity fluctuation and temperature fluctuation in the near-wall region of a turbulent boundary layer. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 31, 723–730.Google Scholar
Bejan, A. E. 1978 General criterion for rating heat-exchanger performance. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 21, 655–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bewley, T., Moin, P. & Temam, R. 2001 DNS-based predictive control of turbulence: an optimal benchmark for feedback algorithms. J. Fluid Mech. 447, 179–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, H., Moin, P. & Kim, J. 1994 Active turbulence control for drag reduction in wall-bounded flows. J. Fluid Mech. 262, 75–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eiamsa-ard, S. & Promvonge, P. 2011 Influence of double-sided delta-wing tape insert with alternate-axes on flow and heat transfer characteristics in a heat exchanger tube. Chin. J. Chem. Engng 19 (3), 410–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frohnapfel, B., Hasegawa, Y. & Kasagi, N. 2010 Friction drag reduction through damping of the near-wall spanwise velocity fluctuation. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 31, 434–441.Google Scholar
Frohnapfel, B., Hasegawa, Y. & Quadrio, M. 2012 Money versus time: evaluation of flow control in terms of energy consumption and convenience. J. Fluid Mech. 700, 406–418.Google Scholar
Fukagata, K., Iwamoto, K. & Kasagi, N. 2002 Contribution of Reynolds stress distribution to the skin friction in wall-bounded flows. Phys. Fluids 14, L73–L76.Google Scholar
Hasegawa, Y. & Kasagi, N. 2011 Dissimilar control of momentum and heat transfer in a fully developed turbulent channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 683, 57–93.Google Scholar
Iida, O. & Kasagi, N. 1997 Direct numerical simulation of unstably stratified turbulent channel flow. Trans. ASME: J. Heat Transfer 119, 53–61.Google Scholar
Iida, O., Kasagi, N. & Nagano, Y. 2002 Direct numerical simulation of turbulent channel flow under stable density stratification. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 45, 1693–1703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasagi, N., Hasegawa, Y., Fukagata, K. & Iwamoto, K. 2012 Control of turbulent transport: Less friction and more heat transfer. Trans. ASME: J. Heat Transfer 134, 031009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasagi, N., Kuroda, A. & Tomita, Y. 1992 Direct numerical simulation of passive scalar field in a turbulent channel flow. Trans. ASME: J. Heat Transfer 114, 598–606.Google Scholar
Keys, W., Crawford, M. E. & Weigand, B. 2005 Convective Heat and Mass Transfer, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Kim, J., Moin, P. & Moser, R. 1987 Turbulence statistics in fully developed channel flow at low Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 177, 133–166.Google Scholar
Lee, C., Kim, J. & Choi, H. 1998 Suboptimal control of turbulent channel flow for drag reduction. J. Fluid Mech. 358, 245–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manglik, R. M. & Bergles, A. E. 1995 Heat transfer and pressure drop correlations for the rectangular offset strip fin compact heat exchanger. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 10, 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Min, T., Kang, S. M., Speyer, J. L. & Kim, J. 2006 Sustained sub-laminar drag in a fully developed channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 558, 309–318.Google Scholar
Morimoto, K., Suzuki, Y. & Kasagi, N. 2010 Optimal shoe design of compact heat exchangers based on adjoint analysis of momentum and heat transfer. J. Therm. Sci. Tech. 5, 24–35.Google Scholar
Nagano, Y., Hattori, H. & Houra, T. 2004 DNS of velocity and thermal fields in turbulent channel flow with transverse-rib roughness. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 25, 393–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakanishi, R., Mamori, H. & Fukagata, K. 2012 Relaminarization of turbulent channel flow using travelling wave-like wall deformation. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 35, 152–159.Google Scholar
Quadrio, M., Ricco, P. & Viotti, C. 2009 Streamwise-travelling waves of spanwise wall velocity for turbulent drag reduction. J. Fluid Mech. 627, 161–178.Google Scholar
Rai, M. & Moin, K. 1991 Direct simulations of turbulent flow using finite-difference scheme. J. Comput. Phys. 96, 15–53.Google Scholar
Reynolds, O. 1874 On the extent and action of the heating surface of steam boilers. Manchester Lit. Phil. Soc. Mem. Proc. 14, 7–12.Google Scholar
Satake, S. & Kasagi, N. 1996 Turbulence control with wall-adjacent thin layer damping spanwise velocity fluctuations. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 17, 343–352.Google Scholar
Spalart, P., Moser, R. & Rogers, M. 1991 Spectral methods for the Navier–Stokes equations with one infinite and two periodic directions. J. Comput. Phys. 96, 297–324.Google Scholar
Stasiek, J., Collins, M. W., Ciofalo, M. & Chew, P. E. 1996 Investigation of flow and heat transfer in corrugated passages – l. Experimental results. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 39, 149–164.Google Scholar