Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Particle dynamics in the channel flow of a turbulent particle–gas suspension at high Stokes number. Part 1. DNS and fluctuating force model

  • Partha S. Goswami (a1) and V. Kumaran (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

The fluctuating force model is developed and applied to the turbulent flow of a gas–particle suspension in a channel in the limit of high Stokes number, where the particle relaxation time is large compared to the fluid correlation time, and low particle Reynolds number where the Stokes drag law can be used to describe the interaction between the particles and fluid. In contrast to the Couette flow, the fluid velocity variances in the different directions in the channel are highly non-homogeneous, and they exhibit significant variation across the channel. First, we analyse the fluctuating particle velocity and acceleration distributions at different locations across the channel. The distributions are found to be non-Gaussian near the centre of the channel, and they exhibit significant skewness and flatness. However, acceleration distributions are closer to Gaussian at locations away from the channel centre, especially in regions where the variances of the fluid velocity fluctuations are at a maximum. The time correlations for the fluid velocity fluctuations and particle acceleration fluctuations are evaluated, and it is found that the time correlation of the particle acceleration fluctuations is close to the time correlations of the fluid velocity in a ‘moving Eulerian’ reference, moving with the mean fluid velocity. The variances of the fluctuating force distributions in the Langevin simulations are determined from the time correlations of the fluid velocity fluctuations and the results are compared with direct numerical simulations. Quantitative agreement between the two simulations are obtained provided the particle viscous relaxation time is at least five times larger than the fluid integral time.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Email address for correspondence: kumaran@chemeng.iisc.ernet.in
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

1. V. Armenio & V. Fiorotto 2001 Equation of motion for a small rigid sphere in a non-uniform flow. Phys. Fluids 13, 2437.

2. S. Balachandar & J. K. Eaton 2010 Turbulent dispersed multiphase flow. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 42, 111133.

3. J. Bec , L. Biferale , G. Boffetta , A. Celani , M. Cencini , A. Lanotte , S. Musacchio & F. Toschi 2006 Acceleration statistics of heavy particles in turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 550, 349358.

4. J. Bec , L. Biferale , G. Boffetta , M. Cencini , A. S. Lanotte & F. Toschi 2010 Intermittency in the velocity distribution of heavy particles in turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 646, 527536.

5. C. Canuto , M. Hussaini & T. Zang 1988 Spectral Methods in Fluid Dynamics. Springer.

6. J. P. Carlier , M. Khaliji & B. Osterle 2005 An improved model for anisotropic dispersion of small particles in turbulent shear flows. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 39, 196205.

8. S. Elghobashi & G. C. Truesdell 1992 Direct simulation of particle dispersion in a decaying isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 242, 655.

9. S. Elghobashi & G. C. Truesdell 1993 On the two-way interaction between homogeneous turbulence and the dispersed solid particles. Part 1. Turbulence modification. Phys. Fluids A 5, 1790.

10. J. R. Fessler , J. D. Kulick & J. K. Eaton 1994 Preferential concentration of heavy particles in a turbulent channel flow. Phys. Fluids 6, 37423749.

11. P. Fevrier , O. Simonin & K. D. Squires 2005 Partitioning of the particle velocities in gas–solid turbulent flows into a continuous field and a spatially uncorrelated random distribution: theoretical formalism and numerical study. J. Fluid Mech. 533, 146.

12. I. Fouxon & P. Horvai 2008 Separation of heavy particles in turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 040601.

13. S. Gerashchenko , N. S. Sharp , S. Neuscamman & Z. Warhaft 2008 Lagrangian measurements of inertial particle accelerations in a turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 617, 255281.

15. R. A. Gore & C. T. Crowe 1989 Effect of particle size on modulating turbulent intensity. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 15, 279.

16. P. S. Goswami & V. Kumaran 2010a Particle dynamics in a turbulent particle–gas suspension at high Stokes number. Part 1. Velocity and acceleration distributions. J. Fluid Mech. 646, 5990.

17. P. S. Goswami & V. Kumaran 2010b Particle dynamics in a turbulent particle–gas suspension at high Stokes number. Part 2. The fluctuating force model. J. Fluid Mech. 646, 91125.

18. P. S. Goswami & V. Kumaran 2011 Particle dynamics in the channel flow of a turbulent particle–gas suspension at high Stokes number. Part 2. Comparison of fluctuating force simulations and experiments. J. Fluid Mech. 687, 4171.

20. J. Kim , P. Moin & R. Moser 1987 Turbulence statistics in fully developed channel flow at low Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 177, 133166.

21. L. Kleiser & U. Schumann 1980 Treatment of incompressibility and boundary conditions in 3D numerical spectral simulations of plane channel flows. In Proceedings of the 3rd GAMM Conference on Numerical Methods in Fluid Mechanics, vol. 2 (ed. E. H. Hirschel ). pp. 165173.

22. R. H. Kraichnan 1958 Irreversible statistical mechanics of incompressible hydromagnetic turbulence. Phys. Rev. 109, 14071422.

23. J. D. Kulick , J. R. Fessler & J. K. Eaton 1994 Particle response and turbulence modification in a fully developed channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 277, 109134.

24. V. Kumaran 2003 Stability of a sheared particle suspension. Phys. Fluids 15, 36253637.

25. V. Lavezzo , A. Soldati , S. Gerashchenko , Z. Warhaft & L. R. Collins 2010 On the role of gravity and shear on inertial particle accelerations in near-wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 658, 229246.

26. Y. Li & J. B. McLaughlin 2001 Numerical simulation of particle-laden turbulent channel flow. Phys. Fluids 13, 2957.

27. M. R. Maxey & J. J. Riley 1983 Equation of motion for a small rigid sphere in a non-uniform flow. Phys. Fluids 26, 883.

28. J. J. Riley & G. S. Patterson 1974 Diffusion experiments with numerically integrated isotropic turbulence. Phys. Fluids 17, 292.

29. D. W. I. Rouson & J. K. Eaton 2001 On the preferential concentration of solid particles in turbulent channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 428, 149.

30. K. D. Squires & J. K. Eaton 1990 Particle response and turbulence modification in isotropic turbulence. Phys. Fluids A 2, 1191.

31. K. D. Squires & J. K. Eaton 1991 Preferential concentration of particles by turbulence. Phys. Fluids A 3, 1169.

32. T. Tanaka & J. K. Eaton 2008 Classification of turbulence modification by dispersed spheres using a novel dimensionless number. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 114502.

33. H.-K. Tsao & D. L. Koch 1995 Shear flows of a dilute gas–solid suspension. J. Fluid Mech. 296, 211245.

34. Y. Yamamoto , M. Potthoff , T. Tanaka , T. Kajishima & Y. Tsuji 2001 Large-eddy simulation of turbulent gas–particle flow in a vertical channel: effect of considering interparticle collisions. J. Fluid Mech. 442, 303334.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Fluid Mechanics
  • ISSN: 0022-1120
  • EISSN: 1469-7645
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-fluid-mechanics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
MathJax

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 63 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 93 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.