Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T20:24:21.538Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The prediction of separation of the turbulent boundary layer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2006

B. S. Stratford
Affiliation:
National Gas Turbine Establishment, Farnborough

Abstract

A rapid method for the prediction of flow separation results from an approximate solution of the equations of motion; a single empirical factor is required. The equations are integrated by a modified ‘inner and outer solutions’ technique developed recently for laminar boundary layers, the criterion for separation being obtained as a simple formula applying directly to the separation position. At Reynolds numbers of the order of 106, the criterion is $C_p(xdC_p|dx)^{\frac {1}{2}} = 0 \cdot 39 (10^{-6}R)^{\frac {1}{10}},$ when d2p/dx2 [ges ] 0 and Cp [les ] 4/7; the coefficient 0·39 is replaced by 0·35 when d2p/dx2 < 0.

The prediction of the pressure rise to separation is likely to be from 0 to 10% too low, which puts it second in accuracy to those methods, such as Maskell's (1951), which utilize the Ludweig-Tillmann skin friction law. However, the convenience of the method makes the present error acceptable for many applications, while a greater accuracy should be attainable from an improved allowance for the quantity d2p/dx2.

The main derivation is for arbitrary pressure distributions, while an extension leads to the pressure distribution which just maintains zero skin friction throughout the region of pressure rise.

The concept of a turbulent inner layer with zero wall stress is put forward, and it is deduced that in the neighbourhood of the wall the velocity is proportional to the square root of the distance from the wall.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1959 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Von Doenhoff, A. E. & Tetervin, N. 1943 Rep. Nat. Adv. Comm. Aero., Wash., no. 772.
Durand, W. F. (Ed.) 1943 Aerodynamic Theory, Vol.III. California Institute of Technology.
Goldstein, S. (Ed.) 1938 Modern Developments in Fluid Dynamics, Vols. I and II. Oxford University Press.
Kalikhmann, L. E. 1943 Dokl. Akad. Nauk, SSSR, 38, 165.
Ludweig, H. & Tillmann, W. 1949 Tech. Mem. Nat. Adv. Comm. Aero., Wash., no. 1285 (transl.).
Maskell, E. C. 1951 Aero. Res. Coun., Lond., Unpublished Paper no. 14, 654.
Rotta, J. 1953 Rep. no. 8. University of Göttingen.
Schlichting, H. 1941 Tech. Mem. Nat. Adv. Comm. Aero., Wash., no. 1218 (transl.).
Schubauer, G. B. & Klebanoff, P. S. 1950 Rep. Nat. Adv. Comm. Aero., Wash., no. 1030.
Spence, D. A. 1956a Aero. Res. Coun., Lond., Unpublished Paper no. 18,261. (Modified method by Spence; also a review of methods including those of Garner, Schuh, Truckenbrodt, and Zaat).
Spence, D. A. 1956b J. Aero. Sci., 23, 3.
Squire, H. B. 1950 Rep. & Mem. Aero. Res. Coun., Lond., no. 2751.
Squire, H. B. & Young, A. D. 1937 Rep. & Mem. Aero. Res. Coun., Lond., no. 1838.
Stratford, B. S. 1954 Rep. & Mem. Aero. Res. Coun., Lond., no. 3002.
Stratford, B. S. 1956 Curr. Pap. Aero. Res. Coun., Lond., no. 307.
Stratford, B. S. 1959 J. Fluid Mech. 5, 17.
Thwaites, B. 1949 Aero. Quart. 1, 245.
Walz, A. 1943 U & M no. 3060. University of Göttingen.
Young, A. D. & Winterbottom, N. E. 1940 Rep. & Mem. Aero. Res. Coun., Lond., no. 2400.