Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Proximal bodies in hypersonic flow

  • STUART J. LAURENCE (a1), R. DEITERDING (a2) and G. HORNUNG (a1)

Abstract

Hypersonic flows involving two or more bodies travelling in close proximity to one another are encountered in several important situations. The present work seeks to explore one aspect of the resulting flow problem by investigating the forces experienced by a secondary body when it is within the domain of influence of a primary body travelling at hypersonic speeds.

An analytical methodology based on the blast wave analogy is developed and used to predict the secondary force coefficients for simple geometries in both two and three dimensions. When the secondary body is entirely inside the primary shocked region, the nature of the lateral force coefficient is found to depend strongly on the relative size of the two bodies. For two spheres, the methodology predicts that the secondary body will experience an exclusively attractive lateral force if the secondary diameter is larger than one-sixth of the primary diameter. The analytical results are compared with those from numerical simulations and reasonable agreement is observed if an appropriate normalization for the relative lateral displacement of the two bodies is used.

Results from a series of experiments in the T5 hypervelocity shock tunnel are also presented and compared with perfect-gas numerical simulations, with good agreement. A new force-measurement technique for short-duration hypersonic facilities, enabling the experimental simulation of the proximal bodies problem, is described. This technique provides two independent means of measurement, and the agreement observed between the two gives a further degree of confidence in the results obtained.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Ambrosio, A. & Wortman, A. 1962 Stagnation point shock detachment distance for flow around spheres and cylinders. ARS J. 32, 281.
Artem'eva, N. A. & Shuvalov, V. V. 1996 Interaction of shock waves during the passage of a disrupted meteoroid through the atmosphere. Shock Waves 5, 359367.
Artemieva, N. A. & Shuvalov, V. V. 2001 Motion of a fragmented meteoroid through the planetary atmosphere. J. Geophys. Res. 106 (E2), 32973309.
Berger, M. & Colella, P. 1988 Local adaptive mesh refinement for shock hydrodynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 82, 6484.
Billig, F. S. 1967 Shock-wave shapes around spherical- and cylindrical-nosed bodies. J. Spacecraft Rockets 4, 822823.
Carman, J. B. Jr 1980 Store separation testing techniques at the Arnold Engineering Development Center–Volume I: An Overview. Tech. Rep. AEDC-TR-79-1. Arnold Engineering Development Center.
Deiterding, R. 2003 Construction and application of an AMR algorithm for distributed memory computers. In Adaptive Mesh Refinement–Theory and Applications. Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering vol. 1, pp. 361–372.
Deiterding, R. 2005 Detonation structure simulation with AMROC. In High Performance Computing and Communications 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 3726, pp. 916–927.
Deiterding, R., Radovitzky, R., Mauch, S. P., Noels, L., Cummings, J. C. & Meiron, D. I. 2005 A virtual test facility for the efficient simulation of solid materials under high energy shock-wave loading. Engng Comput. 22 (3–4), 325347.
Hayes, D. H. & Probstein, R. R 1966 Hypersonic Flow Theory. Academic.
Hornung, H., Sturtevant, B., Bélanger, J., Sanderson, S. & Brouillette, M. 1991 Performance of the new free-piston shock tunnel T5 at GALCIT. In Proc. 18th Int. Symp. on Shock Waves, Sendai, Japan. Springer.
Joarder, R. & Jagadeesh, J. 2004 A new free floating accelerometer balance system for force measurement in shock tunnels. Shock Waves 13, 409412.
Lees, L. 1955 Hypersonic flow. In Proc. 5th Intl Conf. Los Angeles, pp. 241–276. Inst. Aero. Soc., New York.
Lordi, J. A., Mates, R. E. & Moselle, J. R. 1966 Computer program for the numerical solution of nonequilibrium expansions of reacting gas mixtures. NASA CR-472.
Lukasiewicz, J. 1962 Blast-hypersonic flow analogy – theory and application. ARS J. 32, 13411346.
McIntosh, M. K. 1969 A computer program for the numerical calculation of equilibrium and perfect gas conditions in shock tunnels. Tech. Rep. CPD 169. Australian Defense Scientific Service.
Mee, D. J. 2003 Dynamic calibration of force balances for impulse hypersonic facilities. Shock Waves 12, 443455.
Mee, D. J., Daniel, W. J. T. & Simmons, J. M. 1996 Three-component force balance for flows of millisecond duration. AIAA J. 34 (3), 590595.
Meyer, S. L. 1975 Data Analysis for Scientists and Engineers. John Wiley.
Naumann, K. W., Ende, H., Mathieu, G. & George, A. 1993 Millisecond aerodynamic force measurement with side-jet model in the ISL shock tunnel. AIAA J. 31 (6), 590595.
Passey, Q. R. & Melosh, H. J. 1980 Effects of atmospheric breakup on crater field formation. Icarus 42, 211233.
Robinson, M. J., Mee, D. J., Tsai, C. Y. & Bakos, R. J. 2004 Three-component force measurements on a large scramjet in a shock tunnel. J. Spacecraft Rockets 41, 416425.
Sahoo, N., Mahapatra, D. R., Jagadesh, G., Gopalakrishnan, S. & Reddy, K. P. G. 2003 An accelerometer balance system for measurement of aerodynamic force coefficients over blunt bodies in a hypersonic shock tunnel. Meas. Sci. Technol. 14, 260272.
Sanderson, S. R. & Simmons, J. M. 1991 Drag balance for hypervelocity impulse facilities. AIAA J. 12, 21852191.
Schultz, P. H. & Sugita, S. 1994 Penetrating and escaping the atmospheres of Venus and Earth. In Lunar and Planetary Science Conf. XXV, pp. 1215–1216.
Sedov, L. I. 1959 Similarity and Dimensional Methods in Mechanics. Trans. ed. Maurice Holt. Trans. Morris Friedman from the 4th Russian edn. Academic.
Storkmann, V., Olivier, H. & Gronig, H. 1998 Force measurement in hypersonic impulse facilities. AIAA J. 36, 342348.
Tanno, H., Itoh, K., Saito, K., Abe, A. & Takayama, K. 2004 Shock wave interaction with a sphere in a shock tube. In Intl Symp. on Interdisciplinary Shock Wave Research, pp. 483–497. Interdisciplinary Shock Wave Research Center.
Taylor, G. I. 1950 The formation of a blast wave by a very intense explosion. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 201, 159174.
Toro, E. F. 1999 Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics. Springer.
Warren, W. R., Kaegi, E. M. & Geiger, R. E. 1961 Shock tunnel experimental techniques for force and moment and surface flow direction measurements. ARS J. 31 (1), 8283.
Woods, W. C., Holland, S. D. & DiFulvio, M. 2001 Hyper-X stage separation wind-tunnel test program. J. Spacecraft Rockets 38, 811819.
Wright, M. J., Candler, G. V. & Bose, D. 1998 Data-parallel line relaxation method for the Navier–Stokes equations. AIAA J. 36, 16031609.
MathJax
MathJax is a JavaScript display engine for mathematics. For more information see http://www.mathjax.org.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Proximal bodies in hypersonic flow

  • STUART J. LAURENCE (a1), R. DEITERDING (a2) and G. HORNUNG (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.