Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T04:20:24.230Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response of supercritical round jets to various excitation modes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2021

Mohammad Shahsavari ,
Bing Wang Open the ORCID record for Bing Wang [Opens in a new window] ,
Bo Zhang ,
Guanyu Jiang  and
Dan Zhao
Mohammad Shahsavari
Affiliation:
School of Aerospace Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing100084, PR China
Bing Wang*
Affiliation:
School of Aerospace Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing100084, PR China
Bo Zhang
Affiliation:
School of Aerospace Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing100084, PR China
Guanyu Jiang
Affiliation:
School of Aerospace Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing100084, PR China
Dan Zhao
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch8041, New Zealand
*
†Email address for correspondence: wbing@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this study, the response of a supercritical round jet to various excitation modes including varicose, helical, flapping, dual varicose/helical and dual varicose/flapping is studied using large eddy simulations. A translation method is proposed to enhance the accuracy of the equation-of-state and transport correlations. Results show that the excitations, especially the dual modes and the varicose mode (when the forcing frequency matches the preferred mode in the potential core), considerably increase the turbulent mixing, the pitch distance and the penetration depth of the coherent structures as compared with the unexcited case. However, the excitations, especially the dual modes, de-energize the coherent structures and reduce the degree of three-dimensionality of the coherent structures. The excitations reduce the potential core length drastically, especially under the flapping and the dual mode excitations. Analyses show that the dual varicose/flapping mode excitations have the highest impacts on the jet development and the cross-section shape as compared with the other modes. Moreover, the dual varicose/flapping excitations have the highest impact on the large-scale turbulent mixing. However, the small-scale turbulent mixing is at the maximum value, when the supercritical jet is stimulated by the dual varicose/flapping mode excitations with the varicose-to-flapping frequency ratio of 2. The cross-correlations between the density fluctuations and the imposed perturbations indicate that the impact of the excitations on the turbulent diffusion is at the maximum value at the potential core breakdown location, while the correlation diminishes at the other locations.

JFM classification

Mixing: Turbulent mixing Turbulent Flows: Turbulence control Flow Control: Mixing enhancement
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 915 , 25 May 2021 , A47
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abudour, A.M., Mohammad, S.A., Robinson, R.L. & Gasem, K.A.M. 2012 Volume-translated Peng–Robinson equation of state for saturated and single-phase liquid densities. Fluid Phase Equilib. 335, 74–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alkislar, M.B., Krothapalli, A. & Butler, G.W. 2007 The effect of streamwise vortices on the aeroacoustics of a Mach 0.9 jet. J. Fluid. Mech. 578, 139–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atsavapranee, P. & Gharib, M. 1997 Structures in stratified plane mixing layers and the effects of cross-shear. J. Fluid Mech. 342, 53–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagheri-Sadeghi, N., Shahsavari, M. & Farshchi, M. 2013 Experimental characterization of response of lean premixed low-swirl flames to acoustic excitations. Intl J. Spray Combust. 5 (4), 309–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banuti, D.T. & Hannemann, K. 2016 The absence of a dense potential core in supercritical injection: a thermal break-up mechanism. Phys. Fluids 28 (3), 035103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellan, J. 2006 Theory, modeling and analysis of turbulent supercritical mixing. Combust. Sci. Technol. 178 (1–3), 253–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradbury, L.J.S. & Khadem, A.H. 1975 The distortion of a jet by tabs. J. Fluid Mech. 70, 801–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broze, G. & Hussain, F. 1994 Nonlinear dynamics of forced transitional jets: periodic and chaotic attractors. J. Fluid Mech. 263, 93–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, J., Du, Y., Zheng, S., Duan, X. & Liu, Y. 2019 Performance analysis of different influencing factors on film cooling and the internal relations with vortex structures. AIP Adv. 9 (7), 070701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charonko, J.J. & Prestridge, K. 2017 Variable-density mixing in turbulent jets with coflow. J. Fluid Mech. 825, 887–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chassaing, P. 1979 Mélange turbulent de gaz inertes dans un jet de tube libre. PhD thesis, Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.Google Scholar
Chehroudi, B. 2012 Recent experimental efforts on high-pressure supercritical injection for liquid rockets and their implications. Intl J. Aerospace Engng 121802, 1–31.Google Scholar
Chehroudi, B., Cohn, R., Talley, D. & Badakhshan, A. 2000 Raman scattering measurements in the initial region of sub- and supercritical jets. In 36th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit, vol. 3392, pp. 1–11. AIAA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chehroudi, B. & Talley, D. 2002 Interaction of acoustic waves with a cryogenic nitrogen jet at sub-and supercritical pressures. In 40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit. AIAA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chehroudi, B., Talley, D. & Coy, E. 2002 Visual characteristics and initial growth rates of round cryogenic jets at subcritical and supercritical pressures. Phys. Fluids 14 (2), 850–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, T.S., Chao, Y.C., Wu, D.C., Hsu, H.W. & Yuan, T. 2001 Effects of partial premixing on pollutant emissions in swirling methane jet flames. Combust. Flame 125 (1–2), 865–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung, T.H., Ajlan, M., Lee, L.L. & Starling, K.E. 1988 Generalized multiparameter correlation for nonpolar and polar fluid transport-properties. Ind. Engng Chem. Res. 27 (4), 671–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corke, T.C. & Kusek, S.M. 1993 Resonance in axisymmetric jets with controlled helical-mode input. J. Fluid Mech. 249, 307–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crow, S.C. & Champagne, F.H. 1971 Orderly structure in jet turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 48, 547–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Da Silva, C.B. & Metais, O. 2002 Vortex control of bifurcating jets: a numerical study. Phys. Fluids 14, 3798–3819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danaila, I. & Boersma, B.J. 2000 Direct numerical simulation of bifurcating jets. Phys. Fluids 12 (5), 1255–1257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, D.W. & Chehroudi, B. 2007 Measurements in an acoustically driven coaxial jet under sub-, near-, and supercritical conditions. J. Propul. Power 23 (2), 364–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deng, N., Noack, B.R., Morzynski, M. & Pastur, R. 2020 Low-order model for successive bifurcations of the fuidic pinball. J. Fluid Mech. 884, A37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duarte, A.R.C., Mano, J.F. & Reis, R.L. 2009 Supercritical fluids in biomedical and tissue engineering applications: a review. Intl Mater. Rev. 54 (4), 214–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erriguible, A., Laugier, S., Late, M. & Subra-Paternault, P. 2013 Effect of pressure and non-isothermal injection on re-crystallization by $\textrm {CO}_2$ antisolvent: solubility measurements, simulation of mixing and experiments. J. Supercrit. Fluid 76, 115–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiedler, H.E. 1988 Coherent structures in turbulent flows. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 25 (3), 231–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givler, S.D. & Abraham, J. 1996 Supercritical droplet vaporization and combustion studies. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 22 (1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gohil, T.B., Saha, A.K. & Muralidhar, K. 2013 Direct numerical simulation of forced circular jets: effect of varicose perturbation. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 44, 524–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gohil, T.B. & Saha, A.K. 2019 Numerical simulation of forced circular jets: effect of flapping perturbation. Phys. Fluids 31, 063602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gohil, T.B., Saha, A.K. & Muralidhar, K. 2015 Simulation of the blooming phenomenon in forced circular jets. J. Fluid Mech. 783, 567–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutmark, E. & Ho, C.M. 1983 Preferred modes and the spreading rates of jets. Phys. Fluids 26 (10), 2932–2938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hakim, L., Schmitt, T., Ducruix, S. & Candel, S. 2015 Dynamics of a transcritical coaxial flame under a high-frequency transverse acoustic forcing: influence of the modulation frequency on the flame response. Combust. Flame 162 (10), 3482–3502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, P.C., Pereyra, V. & Scherer, G. 2013 Least Squares Data Fitting with Applications. The Johns Hopkings University Press.Google Scholar
Hasan, M.A.Z. & Hussain, A.K.M.F. 1982 The self-excited axisymmetric jet. J. Fluid Mech. 115, 59–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henczka, M., Baldyga, J. & Shekunov, B.Y. 2005 Particle formation by turbulent mixing with supercritical antisolvent. Chem. Engng Sci. 60 (8–9), 2193–2201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, C.M. & Huerre, P. 1984 Perturbed free shear layers. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 16, 365–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong, S., Kim, S.J., Chung, K.Y., Chun, M.S., Lee, B.G. & Kim, J. 2013 Continuous synthesis of lithium iron phosphate ($\textrm {LiFePO}_4$) nanoparticles in supercritical water: effect of mixing tee. J. Supercrit. Fluid 73, 70–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husain, H.S. & Hussain, A.K.M.F. 1983 Controlled excitation of elliptic jets. Phys. Fluids 26, 2763–2765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hussain, A.K.M.F. 1981 Coherent structures and studies of perturbed and unperturbed jets. In Role of Coherent Structures in Modelling Turbulence and Mixing. Proceedings of the International Conference, pp. UAM–IBM Sci. Center, U. Politecnica Madrid.Google Scholar
Hussain, A.K.M.F. 1986 Coherent structures and turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 173, 303–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ianiro, A., Lynch, K.P., Violato, D., Cardone, G. & Scarano, F. 2018 Three-dimensional organization and dynamics of vortices in multichannel swirling jets. J. Fluid Mech. 843, 180–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J., Bodony, D.J. & Freund, J.B. 2014 Adjoint-based control of loud events in a turbulent jet. J. Fluid Mech. 741, 28–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, C.R., Mungal, M.G., Reynolds, W.C. & Powell, J.D. 1989 Helical modes in an acoustically excited round air jet. Phys. Fluids 1, 1443–1443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornev, N., Kröger, H., Turnow, J. & Hassel, E. 2007 Synthesis of artificial turbulent fields with prescribed second-order statistics using the random-spot method. Proc. Appl. Maths Mech. 7, 2100047–2100048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lapenna, P.E. & Creta, F. 2019 Direct numerical simulation of transcritical jets at moderate reynolds number. AIAA J. 57 (6), 2254–2263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, B., Zhang, Y., Zhang, W. & Hua, Z. 2008 Supercritical $\textrm {CO}_2$ spray drying of ethyl cellulose (EC) for preparing microparticles. Dry. Technol. 26 (4), 464–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, T.A. & Petersen, R.A. 1992 Controlled interactions in a forced axisymmetric jet. Part 1. The distortion of the mean flow. J. Fluid Mech. 235, 37–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansour, M.S., Elbaz, A.M., Roberts, W.L., Senosy, M.S., Zayed, M.F., Juddoo, M. & Masri, A.R. 2017 Effect of the mixing fields on the stability and structure of turbulent partially premixed flames in a concentric flow conical nozzle burner. Combust. Flame 175, 180–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, W., Telaar, J., Branam, R., Schneider, G. & Hussong, J. 2003 Raman measurements of cryogenic injection at supercritical pressure. Heat Mass Transfer 39 (8–9), 709–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mi, J., Nobes, D.S. & Nathan, G.J. 2001 Influence of jet exit conditions on the passive scaler field of an axisymmetric free jet. J. Fluid Mech. 432, 91–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moffatt, H.K. 1969 The degree of knottedness of tangled vortex lines. J. Fluid Mech. 35, 117–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murugappan, S., Gutmark, E.J., Lakhamraju, R.R. & Khosla, S. 2008 Flow-structure interaction effects on a jet emanating from a flexible nozzle. Phys. Fluids 20, 117105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nathan, G.J., Mi, J., Alwahabi, Z.T., Newbold, G.J.R. & Nobes, D.S. 2006 Impacts of a jet's exit flow pattern on mixing and combustion performance. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 32 (5–6), 496–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, P., Soria, J. & Honnery, D. 2004 The stability of low Reynolds number round jets. Exp. Fluids 36, 473–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oschwald, M. & Schlik, A. 1999 Supercritical nitrogen free jet investigated by spontaneous raman scattering. Exp. Fluids 27, 497–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perumal, A.K. & Zhou, Y. 2018 Parametric study and scaling of jet manipulation using an unsteady minijet. J. Fluid Mech. 848, 592–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poormahmood, A., Shahsavari, M. & Farshchi, M. 2018 Numerical study of cryogenic swirl injection under supercritical conditions. J. Propul. Power 34 (2), 428–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raynal, L., Harion, J.L., FavreMarinet, M. & Binder, G. 1996 The oscillatory instability of plane variable-density jets. Phys. Fluids 8 (4), 993–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeder, M.F. & Samimy, M. 1996 The evolution of a jet with vortex-generating tabs: real-time visualization and quantitative measurements. J. Fluid Mech. 311, 73–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, W.C., Parekh, D.E., Juvet, P.J.D. & Lee, M.J.D. 2003 Bifurcating and blooming jets. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 35, 295–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sagaut, P. 2001 Large Eddy Simulation for Incompressible Flows. Heidelberg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samimy, M., Kim, J.H., Kastner, J., Adamovich, I. & Utkin, Y. 2007 Active control of high-speed and high-Reynolds-number jets using plasma actuators. J. Fluid Mech. 578, 305–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sau, R. & Mahesh, K. 2010 Optimization of pulsed jets in crossflow. J. Fluid Mech. 653, 365–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schadow, K.C. & Gutmark, E. 1992 Combustion instability related to vortex shedding in dump combustors and their passive control. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 18 (2), 117–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, T., Rodriguez, J., Leyva, I.A. & Candel, S. 2012 Experiments and numerical simulation of mixing under supercritical conditions. Phys. Fluids 24 (5), 055104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, T., Selle, L., Ruiz, A. & Cuenot, B. 2010 Large-eddy simulation of supercritical-pressure round jets. AIAA J. 48 (9), 2133–2144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaabani-Ardali, L., Sipp, D. & Lesshafft, L. 2020 Optimal triggering of jet bifurcation: an example of optimal forcing applied to a time-periodic base flow. J. Fluid Mech. 885, A34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shahsavari, M., Aravind, I.B., Chakravarthy, S.R. & Farshchi, M. 2016 Experimental study of lean premixed low swirl flame under acoustic excitations. In International Symposium: Thermoacoustic Instabilities in Gas Turbines and Rocket Engines: Industry Meets Academia. Institute for Advanced Study (IAS) Technische Universität München.Google Scholar
Shahsavari, M. & Farshchi, M. 2018 Large eddy simulation of low swirl flames under external flow excitations. Flow Turbul. Combust. 100 (1), 249–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shahsavari, M., Farshchi, M. & Arabnejad, M.H. 2017 Large eddy simulations of unconfined non-reacting and reacting turbulent low swirl jets. Flow Turbul. Combust. 98 (3), 817–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shahsavari, M., Farshchi, M., Chakravarthy, S.R., Chakraborty, A., Aravind, I.B. & Wang, B. 2019 Low swirl premixed methane-air flame dynamics under acoustic excitations. Phys. Fluids 31 (9), 095106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, H., Rabault, J., Kuhnle, A., Wang, Y. & Wang, T. 2020 Robust active flow control over a range of reynolds numbers using an artificial neural network trained through deep reinforcement learning. Phys. Fluids 32, 053605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyliszczak, A. 2015 Multi-armed jets: a subset of the blooming jets. Phys. Fluids 27 (4), 041703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyliszczak, A. & Geurts, B.J. 2015 Controlled mixing enhancement in turbulent rectangular jets responding to periodically forced inflow condition. J. Turbul. 16, 742–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiltse, J.M. & Glezer, A. 1993 Manipulation of free shear flows using piezoelectric actuators. J. Fluid Mech. 249, 261–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, Z., Wong, W. & Zhou, Y. 2018 Dual-input/single-output extremum-seeking system for jet control. AIAA J. 56, 1463–1471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, G. & Antonia, R.A. 2002 Effects of different initial conditions on a turbulent round free jet. Exp. Fluids 33, 677–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaman, K.B.M. 1996 Axis switching and spreading of an asymmetric jet: the role of coherent structure dynamics. J. Fluid Mech. 316, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaman, K.B.M.Q. & Hussain, A.K.M.F. 1980 Vortex pairing in a circular jet under controlled excitation. Part 1. General jet response. J. Fluid Mech. 101, 449–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaman, K.B.M.Q. & Hussain, A.K.M.F. 1981 Turbulence suppression in free shear flows by controlled excitation. J. Fluid Mech. 103, 133–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, B., Shahsavari, M., Rao, Z., Li, R., Yang, S. & Wang, B. 2020 a Effects of the fresh mixture temperature on thermoacoustic instabilities in a lean premixed swirl-stabilized combustor. Phys. Fluids 32 (4), 047101.Google Scholar
Zhang, B., Shahsavari, M., Rao, Z., Yang, S. & Wang, B. 2019 Contributions of hydrodynamic features of a swirling flow to thermoacoustic instabilities in a lean premixed swirl stabilized combustor. Phys. Fluids 31 (7), 075106.Google Scholar
Zhang, B., Shahsavari, M., Rao, Z., Yang, S. & Wang, B. 2020 b Thermoacoustic instability drivers and mode transitions in a lean premixed methane-air combustor at various swirl intensities. Proc. Combust. Inst. (in press), doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2020.06.226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, F., Su, C., Chen, Z. & Chen, J. 2020 c Experimental study on the mixing characteristics inside an inner preheating transpiring-wall reactor for supercritical water oxidation. J. Supercrit. Fluid 156, 104682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, N., Krishnan, A., Vogel, F. & Peters, W.A. 2000 A computational model for supercritical water oxidation of organic toxic wastes. Adv. Environ. Res. 4 (1), 79–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zong, N., Meng, H., Hsieh, S.Y. & Yang, V. 2004 A numerical study of cryogenic fluid injection and mixing under supercritical conditions. Phys. Fluids 16 (12), 4248–4261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zong, N. 2005 Modeling and simulation of cryogenic fluid injection and mixing dynamics under supercritical conditions. PhD thesis, Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar