Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-18T14:46:54.467Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rotating free-shear flows. Part 2. Numerical simulations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

Olivier Métais
Affiliation:
Laboratoire des Écoulements Géophysiques et Industriels de Grenoble, URA CNRS 1509, Institut de Mécanique de Grenoble, Institut National Polytechnique et Université Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, BP 53, 38041 Grenoble Cédex 9, France
Carlos Flores
Affiliation:
Departemento de Oceanografia- CFE, Mexico, DF, 03810, Mexico
Shinichiro Yanase
Affiliation:
Engineering Mathematics, Faculty of Engineering, Okayama University, Tsushimanaka, Okayama 700, Japan
James J. Riley
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
Marcel Lesieur
Affiliation:
Laboratoire des Écoulements Géophysiques et Industriels de Grenoble, URA CNRS 1509, Institut de Mécanique de Grenoble, Institut National Polytechnique et Université Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, BP 53, 38041 Grenoble Cédex 9, France

Abstract

The three-dimensional dynamics of the coherent vortices in periodic planar mixing layers and in wakes subjected to solid-body rotation of axis parallel to the basic vorticity are investigated through direct (DNS) and large-eddy simulations (LES). Initially, the flow is forced by a weak random perturbation superposed on the basic shear, the perturbation being either quasi-two-dimensional (forced transition) or three-dimensional (natural transition). For an initial Rossby number Ro(i), based on the vorticity at the inflexion point, of small modulus, the effect of rotation is to always make the flow more two-dimensional, whatever the sense of rotation (cyclonic or anticyclonic). This is in agreement with the Taylor–Proudman theorem. In this case, the longitudinal vortices found in forced transition without rotation are suppressed.

It is shown that, in a cyclonic mixing layer, rotation inhibits the growth of three-dimensional perturbations, whatever the value of the Rossby number. This inhibition exists also in the anticyclonic case for |Ro(i)| ≤ 1. At moderate anticyclonic rotation rates (Ro(i) < −1), the flow is strongly destabilized. Maximum destabilization is achieved for |Ro(i) ≈ 2.5, in good agreement with the linear-stability analysis performed by Yanase et al. (1993). The layer is then composed of strong longitudinal alternate absolute vortex tubes which are stretched by the flow and slightly inclined with respect to the streamwise direction. The vorticity thus generated is larger than in the nonrotating case. The Kelvin–Helmholtz vortices have been suppressed. The background velocity profile exhibits a long range of nearly constant shear whose vorticity exactly compensates the solid-body rotation vorticity. This is in agreement with the phenomenological theory proposed by Lesieur, Yanase & Métais (1991). As expected, the stretching is more efficient in the LES than in the DNS.

A rotating wake has one side cyclonic and the other anticyclonic. For |Ro(i)| ≤ 1, the effect of rotation is to make the wake more two-dimensional. At moderate rotation rates (|Ro(i)| > 1), the cyclonic side is composed of Kármán vortices without longitudinal hairpin vortices. Karman vortices have disappeared from the anticyclonic side, which behaves like the mixing layer, with intense longitudinal absolute hairpin vortices. Thus, a moderate rotation has produced a dramatic symmetry breaking in the wake topology. Maximum destabilization is still observed for |Ro(i)| ≈ 2.5, as in the linear theory.

The paper also analyses the effect of rotation on the energy transfers between the mean flow and the two-dimensional and three-dimensional components of the field.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1995 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartello, P., Métais, O. & Lesieur, M. 1994 Coherent structures in rotating three-dimensional turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 273, 129.Google Scholar
Bidokhti, A. A. & Tritton, D. J. 1992 The structure of a turbulent free shear layer in a rotating fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 241, 469502.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, P. 1969 The analogy between streamline curvature and buoyancy in turbulent shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 36, 177191.Google Scholar
Cain, A. B., Ferziger, J. H. & Reynolds, W. C. 1984 Discrete orthogonal function expansions for non-uniform grids using the fast Fourier transform. J. Comput. Phys. 56, 272286.Google Scholar
Chabert D'Hiéres, G., Davies, P. A. & Didelle, H. 1988 Laboratory studies of pseudo-periodic forcing due to vortex shedding from an isolated solid obstacle in an homogeneous rotating fluid. In 20th Intl Liège Colloquium on Ocean Dynamics. Elsevier.
Cimbala, J. M., Nagib, H. M. & Roshko, A. 1988 Large structure in the far wakes of two-dimensional bluff bodies. J. Fluid Mech. 190, 265298.Google Scholar
Comte, P., Lesieur, M. & Lamballais, E. 1992 Large- and small-scale stirring of vorticity and a passive scalar in a 3-D temporal mixing layer. Phys. Fluids A 4, 27612778.Google Scholar
Etling, D. 1990 Mesoscale vortex shedding from large islands: a comparison to laboratory experiments in rotating stratified flows. Met. Atmos. Phys. 43, 145.Google Scholar
Flores, C. 1993 Etude numérique de 1’influence d'une rotation sur les écoulements cisaillés libres. PhD dissertation, National Polytechnic Institute, Grenoble.
Guo, Y. & Finlay, W. H. 1991 Splitting, merging and wavelength selection of vortices in curved and/or rotating channel flow due to Eckhaus instability. J. Fluid Mech. 228, 661691.Google Scholar
Hart, J. E. 1971 Instability and secondary motion in a rotating channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 45, 341351.Google Scholar
Johnston, J. P., Halleen, R. M., & Lezius, D. K. 1972 Effects of spanwise rotation on the structure of two-dimensional fully developped turbulent channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 56, 533557.Google Scholar
Kim, J. 1983 The effect of rotation on turbulence structure. In Proc. 4th Symp. on Turbulent Shear Flows, Karlsruhe, pp. 6.146.19.
Kristoffersen, R. & Andersson, H. I. 1993 Direct simulations of low-Reynolds-number turbulent flow in a rotating channel. J. Fluid Mech. 256, 163197.Google Scholar
Lesieur, M., Yanase, S. & Métais, O. 1991 Stabilizing and destabilizing effects of a solid-body rotation upon quasi-two-dimensional shear layers. Phys. Fluids A 3, 403407.Google Scholar
Meiburg, E. & Lasheras, J. C. 1988 Experimental and numerical investigation of the three-dimensional transition in plane wakes. J. Fluid Mech. 190, 137.Google Scholar
Métais, O. & Lesieur, M. 1992 Spectral large-eddy simulation of isotropic and stably-stratified turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 239, 157194.Google Scholar
Métais, O., Riley, J. J. & Lesieur, M. 1993 Numerical simulations of stably-stratified turbulence. Ninth Symp. on Turbulent Shear Flows, Kyoto, Japan, August 16-18, pp. 1-3-1, 1-3-6.
Métais, O., Yanase, S., Flores, C., Bartello, P. & Lesieur, M. 1992 Reorganization of coherent vortices in shear layers under the action of solid-body rotation. In Turbulent Shear Flows VIII, pp. 415430. Springer.
Michalke, A. 1964 On the inviscid instability of the hyperbolic-tangent profile. J. Fluid Mech. 19, 543556.Google Scholar
Pedley, T. J. 1969 On the stability of viscous flow in a rapidly rotating pipe. J. Fluid Mech., 35, 97115.Google Scholar
Potter, M. C. & Chawla, M. D. 1971 Stability of boundary layer flow subject to rotation. Phys. Fluids 14, 22782281.Google Scholar
Rothe, P. H. & Johnston, J. P. 1979 Free shear layer behaviour in rotating systems. Trans. ASME: J. Fluids Engng 101, 117119.Google Scholar
Sato, H. & Kuriki, K. 1961 The mechanism of transition in the wake of a thin plate placed parallel to a uniform flow. J. Fluid Mech. 11, 321352.Google Scholar
Tafti, D. K. & Vanka, S. P. 1991 A numerical study of the effects of spanwise rotation on turbulent channel flow. Phys. Fluids A 3, 642656.Google Scholar
Tritton, D. J. & Davies, P. A. 1985 Instabilities in geophysical fluid dynamics. In Hydrodynamic Instabilities and the Transition to Turbulence (ed. H. L. Swinney & J. P. Gollub), pp. 229270. Springer.
Watmuff, J. H., Witt, H. T. & Joubert, P. N. 1985 Developing turbulent boundary layers with system rotation. J. Fluid Mech. 157, 405448.Google Scholar
Williamson, C. & Prasad, A. 1993 Acoustic forcing of oblique wave resonance in the far wake. J. Fluid Mech. 256, 315341.Google Scholar
Witt, H. T. & Joubert, P. N. 1985 Effect of rotation on a turbulent wake. In Proc. 5th Symp. on Turbulent Shear Flows, Cornell, pp. 21.2521.30.
Yanase, S., Flores, C., Métais, O. & Riley, J. J. 1993 Rotating free shear flows Part 1: Linear stability analysis. Phys. Fluids A 5, 27252737.Google Scholar