Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T16:50:02.104Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rough-wall boundary layers in adverse pressure gradients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2006

A. E. Perry  and
P. N. Joubert
A. E. Perry
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Melbourne
P. N. Joubert
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Melbourne
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Smooth- and rough-wall boundary layers and fully developed pipe and duct flow investigations are reviewed. It is shown that the effect of roughness on the flow away from the wall can be accounted for by using an equivalent viscosity νe. This viscosity is thought to depend only on the variables at the wall, such as shear stress τ0, fluid density ρ, viscosity μ and the roughness size and geometry and that the relationship between these variables is the same for both boundary layers and duct flow. However, experiments to date have been confined to the ‘rough régime’ and to boundary layers with a zero pressure gradient.

Experiments were performed and the results show that the above finding can be extended to boundary layers with adverse pressure gradients in the rough régime.

A general method for measuring the local boundary-layer characteristics, with roughness and pressure gradients present, is developed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , October 1963 , pp. 193 - 211
Copyright
© 1963 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ambrose, H. H. 1956 The effect of surface roughness on velocity distribution and boundary resistance. University of Tennessee, Department of Civil Engineering Contract N/r 811(03). Office of Naval Research Department of the Navy.
Clauser, F. H. 1954 Turbulent boundary layers in adverse pressure gradients. J. Aero Sci. 21, 91.Google Scholar
Clauser, F. H. 1956 The turbulent boundary layer. Appl. Mech., 4, 1–51.Google Scholar
Coles, D. 1956 The law of the wake in the turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech., 1, 191–226.Google Scholar
Hama, F. R. 1954 Boundary layer characteristics for smooth and rough surfaces. Trans. Soc. Naval Arch. Mar. Engrs, 62Google Scholar
Ludwig, H. & Tillman, W. 1949 Untersuchungen veber dis Wandschub in turbulenten Reibungsschichten. Ing-Arch. 17, 288–99. Translated as ‘Investigations of the wall shearing stress in turbulent boundary layers’, NACA TM, no. 1285.Google Scholar
Millikan, C. D. 1939 Turbulent flows in channels and circular tubes. Proc. Fifth Int. Congr. Appl. Mechanisms, pp. 386–92.Google Scholar
Moore, W. F. 1951 An experimental investigation of the boundary layer development along a rough surface. Ph.D. dissertation, State University of Iowa.
Nikuradse, J. 1933 Strömungsgesetze in rauhen Rohren. VDI Forshungsheft no. 361. Translated as NACA TM, no. 1292 (1950).Google Scholar
Prandtl, L. & Schlichting, H. 1934 Das Wiederstandagesetz rauher Platten. Werft Reederei Hafen 1–4.Google Scholar
Rotta, J. C. 1950 On the theory of the turbulent boundary layer. NACA TM, no. 1344.Google Scholar
Rotta, J. C. 1962 Turbulent boundary layers in incompressible flow. Progr. Aero. Sci., 2, 5–219.Google Scholar
Sams, K. W. 1952 Experimental investigations of average heat transfer and friction coefficients for air flowing in circular tubes having square-threads type roughness. NACA Res. Mem. RME 52017.Google Scholar
Schlichting, H. 1937 Experimental investigation of the roughness problem. Abridged Translation of Hydraulics Papers. Amer. Soc. Civil Engrs. Proc., 63, 16–31. More complete translation in NACA TM, no. 823.Google Scholar
Streeter, V. & Chu, H. 1949 Fluid flow and heat transfer in artificially roughened pipes. Final Report Project 4918, Armour Research Foundation.