Skip to main content Accessibility help

Singularity formation on perturbed planar shock waves

  • W. Mostert (a1), D. I. Pullin (a1), R. Samtaney (a2) and V. Wheatley (a3)


We present an analysis that predicts the time to development of a singularity in the shape profile of a spatially periodic perturbed, planar shock wave for ideal gas dynamics. Beginning with a formulation in complex coordinates of Whitham’s approximate model geometrical shock dynamics (GSD), we apply a spectral treatment to derive the asymptotic form for the leading-order behaviour of the shock Fourier coefficients for large mode numbers and time. This is shown to determine a critical time at which the coefficients begin to decay, with respect to mode number, at an algebraic rate with an exponent of $-5/2$ , indicating loss of analyticity and the formation of a singularity in the shock geometry. The critical time is found to be inversely proportional to a representative measure of perturbation amplitude $\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}$ with an explicit analytic form for the constant of proportionality in terms of gas and shock parameters. To leading order, the time to singularity formation is dependent only on the first Fourier mode. Comparison with results of numerical solutions to the full GSD equations shows that the predicted critical time somewhat underestimates the time for shock–shock (triple-point) formation, where the latter is obtained by post-processing the numerical GSD results using an edge-detection algorithm. Aspects of the analysis suggest that the appearance of loss of analyticity in the shock surface may be a precursor to the first appearance of shock–shocks, which may account for part of the discrepancy. The frequency of oscillation of the shock perturbation is accurately predicted. In addition, the analysis is extended to the evolution of a perturbed planar, fast magnetohydrodynamic shock for the case when the external magnetic field is aligned parallel to the unperturbed shock. It is found that, for a strong shock, the presence of the magnetic field produces only a higher-order correction to the GSD equations with the result that the time to loss of analyticity is the same as for the gas-dynamic flow. Limitations and improvements for the analysis are discussed, as are comparisons with the analogous appearance of singularity formation in vortex-sheet evolution in an incompressible inviscid fluid.



Hide All
Chisnell, R. F. 1957 The motion of a shock wave in a channel, with applications to cylindrical and spherical shock waves. J. Fluid Mech. 2, 286298.
Clavin, P. 2013 Nonlinear analysis of shock–vortex interaction: Mach stem formation. J. Fluid Mech. 721, 324339.
Denet, B., Biamino, L., Lodato, G., Vervisch, L. & Clavin, P. 2015 Model equation for the dynamics of wrinkled shockwaves: comparison with DNS and experiments. Combust. Sci. Technol. 187 (1–2), 296323.
Faria, L. M., Kasimov, A. R. & Rosales, R. R. 2015 Theory of weakly nonlinear self-sustained detonations. J. Fluid Mech. 784, 163198.
Freeman, N. C. 1957 On the stability of plane shock waves. J. Fluid Mech. 2 (4), 397411.
Gelb, A. & Tadmor, E. 1999 Detection of edges in spectral data. Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. 7, 101135.
Gelb, A. & Tadmor, E. 2000 Detection of edges in spectral data. Part II. Nonlinear enhancement. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 38 (4), 13891408.
Gelb, A. & Tadmor, E. 2006 Adaptive edge detectors for piecewise smooth data based on the minmod limiter. J. Sci. Comput. 28 (2/3), 279306.
Henshaw, W. D., Smyth, N. F. & Schwendeman, D. W. 1986 Numerical shock propagation using geometrical shock dynamics. J. Fluid Mech. 171, 519545.
Lodato, G., Vervisch, L. & Clavin, P. 2016 Direct numerical simulation of shock wavy-wall interaction: analysis of cellular shock structure and flow patterns. J. Fluid Mech. 789, 221258.
Lodato, G., Vervisch, L. & Clavin, P. 2017 Numerical study of smoothly perturbed shocks in the Newtonian limit. Flow Turbul. Combust. 99, 887908.
Majda, A. & Rosales, R. 1983 A theory for spontaneous Mach stem formation in reacting fronts. Part I. The basic perturbation analysis. SIAM J. Appl. Maths 43, 13101334.
Moore, D. W. 1979 The spontaneous appearance of a singularity in the shape of an evolving vortex sheet. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 365 (1720), 105119.
Mostert, W., Pullin, D. I., Samtaney, R. & Wheatley, V. 2017 Geometrical shock dynamics for magnetohydrodynamic fast shocks. J. Fluid Mech. 811, R2.
Olver, F. W. J. 1974 Asymptotics and Special Functions. Academic Press.
Schwendeman, D. W. 1993 A new numerical method for shock wave propagation based on geometrical shock dynamics. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 441 (1912), 331341.
Watanabe, M. & Takayama, K. 1991 Stability of converging cylindrical shock waves. Shock Waves 1 (2), 149160.
Wheatley, V., Pullin, D. I. & Samtaney, R. 2005 Regular shock refraction at an oblique planar density interface in magnetohydrodynamics. J. Fluid Mech. 522, 179214.
Whitham, G. B. 2011 Linear and Nonlinear Waves. Wiley.
Whitham, G. B. 1957 A new approach to problems of shock dynamics. Part I. Two-dimensional problems. J. Fluid Mech. 2, 145171.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Fluid Mechanics
  • ISSN: 0022-1120
  • EISSN: 1469-7645
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-fluid-mechanics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *

JFM classification


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed