Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T19:01:14.062Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Unsteady measurements in a separated and reattaching flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2006

N. J. Cherry ,
R. Hillier  and
M. E. M. P. Latour
N. J. Cherry
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautics, Imperial College, London Present address: Central Electricity Research Laboratories, Leatherhead, Surrey.
R. Hillier
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautics, Imperial College, London
M. E. M. P. Latour
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautics, Imperial College, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Measurements of fluctuating pressure and velocity, together with instantaneous smoke-flow visualizations, are presented in order to reveal the unsteady structure of a separated and reattaching flow. It is shown that throughout the separation bubble a low-frequency motion can be detected which appears to be similar to that found in other studies of separation. This effect is most significant close to separation, where it leads to a weak flapping of the shear layer. Lateral correlation scales of this low-frequency motion are less than the reattachment length, however; it appears that its timescale is about equal to the characteristic timescale for the shear layer and bubble to change between various shedding phases. These phases were defined by the following observations: shedding of pseudoperiodic trains of vortical structures from the reattachment zone, with a characteristic spacing between structures of typically 60% to 80% of the bubble length; a large-scale but irregular shedding of vorticity; and a relatively quiescent phase with the absence of any large-scale shedding structures and a significant ‘necking’ of the shear layer downstream of reattachment.

Spanwise correlations of velocity in the shear layer show on average an almost linear growth of spanwise scale up to reattachment. It appears that the shear layer reaches a fully three-dimensional state soon after separation. The reattachment process does not itself appear to impose an immediate extra three-dimensionalizing effect upon the large-scale structures.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 144 , July 1984 , pp. 13 - 46
Copyright
© 1984 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arie, M. & Rouse, H. 1956 Experiments on two-dimensional flow over a normal wall. J. Fluid Mech. 1, 129–142.Google Scholar
Ashurst, W. T. 1979 Calculation of plane sudden expansion via vortex dynamics. Sandia Lab. Rep. SAND 79–8679.Google Scholar
Brederode, V. A. S. L. de 1975 Three dimensional effects in nominally two-dimensional flows. Ph.D. thesis University of London.
Browand, F. K. & Troutt, T. R. 1980 A note on spanwise structure in the two-dimensional mixing layer. J. Fluid Mech. 97, 771–781.Google Scholar
Brown, G. L. & Roshko, A. 1974 On density effects and large structure in turbulent mixing layers. J. Fluid Mech. 64, 775–816.Google Scholar
Castro, I. P. & Dianat, M. 1983 Surface flow patterns on rectangular bodies in thick boundary layers. J. Wind Engng Indust. Aero. 11, 107–119.Google Scholar
Chandrsuda, C. 1976 A reattaching turbulent shear layer in incompressible flow. Ph.D. thesis, University of London.
Cherry, N. J. 1982 The effects of stream turbulence on a separated flow with reattachment. Ph.D. thesis, University of London.
Cherry, N. J., Hillier, R. & Latour, M. E. M. P. 1983 The unsteady structure of two-dimensional separated and reattaching flows. J. Wind Engng Indust. Aero. 11, 95–105.Google Scholar
Cheung, W. S. 1982 Heat transfer in low speed separated flows. Ph.D. thesis, University of London.
Clark, J. A. & Kit, L. 1980 Shear layer transition and the sharp edged orifice. Trans. ASME I: J. Fluids Engng 102, 219–225.Google Scholar
Eaton, J. K. & Johnston, J. P. 1981 A review of subsonic turbulent flow reattachment. AIAA J. 19, 1093–1100.Google Scholar
Etheridge, D. W. & Kemp, P. H. 1978 Measurements of turbulent flow downstream of a rearward-facing step. J. Fluid Mech. 86, 545–566.Google Scholar
Fricke, F. R. 1971 Pressure fluctuations in separated flow. J. Sound Vib. 17, 113–123.Google Scholar
Gartshore, I. P. & Savill, M. 1982 Some effects of free stream turbulence on the flow around bluff bodies. Euromech 160: Periodic Flow and Wake Phenomena, Berlin.
Hillier, R. 1980 Measurements of mean and fluctuating pressures in a separated flow. IC Aero. TN 80–108.Google Scholar
Hillier, R. & Cherry, N. J. 1981a Pressure fluctuations under a turbulent shear layer. In Proc. 3rd Symp. on Turbulent Shear Flows, Univ. California, Davis, pp. 23–29.
Hillier, R. & Cherry, N. J. 1981b The effects of stream turbulence on separation bubbles. J. Wind Engng and Indust. Aero. 8, 49–58.Google Scholar
Katsura, J. 1976 Fluctuating wind pressure on the side surfaces of models with long rectangular sections. In Proc. 2nd USA—Japan Res. Seminar on Wind Effects on Structures (ed. H. Ishizaki & A. N. L. Chiu), pp. 113–124. University of Tokyo Press.
Kiya, M., Sasaki, K. & Arie, M. 1982 Discrete vortex simulation of a turbulent separation bubble. J. Fluid Mech. 120, 219–244.Google Scholar
Latour, M. E. M. P. & Hillier, R. 1980 Experiments on a two-dimensional separated flow. IC Aero. TN 80–101.Google Scholar
Mabey, D. G. 1971 Pressure fluctuations caused by separated bubble flows at subsonic speeds. RAE Tech. Rep. 71160 ref. Aero 3204, August 1971.Google Scholar
McGuinness, M. D. 1978 Flow with a separation bubble: steady and unsteady aspects. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge.
Moss, W. D. & Baker, S. 1980 Recirculating flows associated with two-dimensional steps. Aero Q. 31, 151–172.Google Scholar
Ota, T. & Itaska, M. 1976 A separated and reattached flow on a blunt flat plate. Trans. ASME I: J. Fluids Engng 98, 79–86.Google Scholar
Parker, R. & Welsh, M. C. 1982 The effect of sound on flow over bluff bodies. In Proc. 3rd Keswick Intl Conf. on Vibration in Nuclear Plant, Keswick, England. Brit. Nucl. Energy Soc., London.
Roshko, A. & Lau, J. 1965 Some observations on transition and reattachment in a free shear layer in incompressible flow. Proc. Heat Transfer Fluid. Mech. Inst. 18 (ed. A. F. Charwat), pp. 157–167. Stanford University Press.
Welsh, M. C. & Gibson, D. C. 1979 Interaction of induced sound with flow past a square leading edged plate in a duct. J. Sound Vib. 67, 501–511.Google Scholar
Westphal, R. V., Eaton, J. K. & Johnston, J. P. 1981 A new probe for measurement of velocity and wall shear stress in unsteady reversing flow. Trans. ASME I: J. Fluids Engng 103, 478–483.Google Scholar
Wygnanski, I. J. & Fiedler, H. E. 1970 The two-dimensional mixing region. J. Fluid Mech. 41, 327–361.Google Scholar