Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T10:22:41.097Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Viscous–poroelastic interaction as mechanism to create adhesion in frogs’ toe pads

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2015

A. Tulchinsky  and
A. D. Gat
A. Tulchinsky
Affiliation:
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel
A. D. Gat*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel
*
†Email address for correspondence: amirgat@technion.ac.il
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The toe pads of frogs consist of soft hexagonal structures and a viscous liquid contained between and within the hexagonal structures. It has been hypothesized that this configuration creates adhesion by allowing for long-range capillary forces, or, alternatively, by allowing for exit of the liquid and thus improving contact of the toe pad. In this work, we suggest interaction between viscosity and elasticity as a mechanism to create temporary adhesion, even in the absence of capillary effects or van der Waals forces. We initially illustrate this concept experimentally by a simplified configuration consisting of two surfaces connected by a liquid bridge and elastic springs. We then utilize poroelastic mixture theory and model frogs’ toe pads as an elastic porous medium, immersed within a viscous liquid and pressed against a rigid rough surface. The flow between the surface and the toe pad is modelled by the lubrication approximation. Inertia is neglected and analysis of the elastic–viscous dynamics yields a governing partial differential equation describing the flow and stress within the porous medium. Several solutions of the governing equation are presented and show a temporary adhesion due to stress created at the contact surface between the solids. This work thus may explain how some frogs (such as the torrent frog) maintain adhesion underwater and the reason for the periodic repositioning of frogs’ toe pads during adhesion to surfaces.

JFM classification

Biological Fluid Dynamics: Biological Fluid Dynamics Low-Reynolds-number flows: Low-Reynolds-number flows Low-Reynolds-number flows: Porous media
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 775 , 25 July 2015 , pp. 288 - 303
Check for updates
Copyright
© 2015 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ambrosi, D. & Preziosi, L. 2000 Modeling injection molding processes with deformable porous preforms. SIAM J. Appl. Maths 61 (1), 22–42.Google Scholar
Anderson, D. 2005 Imbibition of a liquid droplet on a deformable porous substrate. Phys. Fluids 17 (8), 087104.Google Scholar
Atkin, R. & Craine, R. 1976 Continuum theories of mixtures: basic theory and historical development. Q. J. Mech. Appl. Maths 29 (2), 209–244.Google Scholar
Barnes, J., Smith, J., Oines, C. & Mundl, R. 2002 Bionics and wet grip. Tire Technol. Intl 2002 (December), 56–60.Google Scholar
Battiato, I. 2012 Self-similarity in coupled Brinkman/Navier–Stokes flows. J. Fluid Mech. 699, 94–114.Google Scholar
Battiato, I., Bandaru, P. R. & Tartakovsky, D. M. 2010 Elastic response of carbon nanotube forests to aerodynamic stresses. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (14), 144504.Google Scholar
Beavers, G. & Joseph, D. 1967 Boundary conditions at a naturally permeable wall. J. Fluid Mech. 30, 197–207.Google Scholar
Biot, M. 1972 Theory of finite deformations of porous solids. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 21 (7), 597–620.Google Scholar
Bowen, R. 1980 Incompressible porous media models by use of the theory of mixtures. Intl J. Engng Sci. 18 (9), 1129–1148.Google Scholar
Emerson, S. & Diehl, D. 1980 Toe pad morphology and mechanisms of sticking in frogs. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 13 (3), 199–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endlein, T., Barnes, W. J. P., Samuel, D. S., Crawford, N. A., Biaw, A. B. & Grafe, U. 2013a Sticking under wet conditions: the remarkable attachment abilities of the torrent frog, Staurois guttatus . PLoS ONE 8 (9), e73810.Google Scholar
Endlein, T., Ji, A., Samuel, D., Yao, N., Wang, Z., Barnes, W. J. P., Federle, W., Kappl, M. & Dai, Z. 2013b Sticking like sticky tape: tree frogs use friction forces to enhance attachment on overhanging surfaces. J. R. Soc. Interface 10 (80), 20120838.Google Scholar
Ernst, V. 1973a The digital pads of the tree frog, Hyla cinerea. I. The epidermis. Tissue Cell 5 (1), 83–96.Google Scholar
Ernst, V. 1973b The digital pads of the tree frog, Hyla cinerea. II. The mucous glands. Tissue Cell 5 (1), 97–104.Google Scholar
Federle, W. 2006 Why are so many adhesive pads hairy? J. Expl Biol. 209 (14), 2611–2621.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Federle, W., Barnes, W., Baumgartner, W., Drechsler, P. & Smith, J. 2006 Wet but not slippery: boundary friction in tree frog adhesive toe pads. J. R. Soc. Interface 3 (10), 689–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gat, A., Navaz, H. & Gharib, M. 2011 Dynamics of freely moving plates connected by a shallow liquid bridge. Phys. Fluids 23 (9), 097101.Google Scholar
Green, D. 1979 Treefrog toe pads: comparative surface morphology using scanning electron microscopy. Can. J. Zool. 57 (10), 2033–2046.Google Scholar
Hanna, G., Jon, W. & Barnes, W. 1991 Adhesion and detachment of the toe pads of tree frogs. J. Expl Biol. 155 (1), 103–125.Google Scholar
Persson, B. 2007 Wet adhesion with application to tree frog adhesive toe pads and tires. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 19 (37), 376110.Google Scholar
Preziosi, L., Joseph, D. & Beavers, G. 1996 Infiltration of initially dry, deformable porous media. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 22 (6), 1205–1222.Google Scholar
Rajagopal, K. & Tao, L. 1995 Mechanics of Mixtures. World Scientific.Google Scholar
Siddique, J.2009 Newtonian and non-Newtonian flows into deformable porous materials. PhD thesis, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.Google Scholar
Siddique, J., Anderson, D. & Bondarev, A. 2009 Capillary rise of a liquid into a deformable porous material. Phys. Fluids 21 (1), 013106.Google Scholar
Tsipenyuk, A. & Varenberg, M. 2014 Use of biomimetic hexagonal surface texture in friction against lubricated skin. J. R. Soc. Interface 11, 20140113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed