Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-07T03:38:46.151Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reflexivized motion verbs in Old Saxon: Semantics, syntax and semiotics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2008

Laura Dale Clopton
Affiliation:
University of California at BerkeleyBerkeley, CA 94720

Abstract

This paper examines four dative reflexive verbs of motion in Old Saxon:faran, gangan, kuman and giuuitan. The linguistic universals of GB syntax and the universal phenomenological categories of Peircean semiotics provide the theoretical framework for this paper. Various syntactic and semantic aspects of the dative reflexive verbs are targeted in the analysis: binding of the reflexive, word order patterns and subject types. The article suggests that a link exists between subject types, V1 syntactic configurations and the appearance of the dative reflexive — only human, animate subjects can license a dative reflexive and the reflexivized verbs exhibit a strong tendency to appear in the narratively visible V1 structure.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Germanic Linguistics 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CITED

Behaghel, Otto. 1932. Deutsche Syntax. Vol. 4. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Brewda, Lee Aaron. 1982. A systematically-based verb valence analysis of Old Saxon. Diss., Princeton Univ.Google Scholar
Bünting, Karl. 1879. Gebrauche der Casus im Heliand. Jever: C. L. Metteker.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Feibleman, James. 1969. An introduction to the philosophy of Charles S. Peirce. 2nd ed.Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Grimm, Jakob. 1967. Deutsche Grammatik. Documenta lin-guistica, Grammatiken des 19. Jahrunderts. Vol 4. Scherer, Wilhelm, ed. Reprint (1890–98). Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Heliand und Genesis. 1984. Behaghel, Otto, ed., rev. by Burkhard, Taeger. Altdeutsche Textbibliothek, 4. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Holthausen, F. 1921. Altsächsisches Elementarbuch. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Kossuth, Karen. 1980. A case grammar of verbal predictors in Old Icelandic. Göppinger Arbeiten zur Germanistik, 271. Göppingen: Kümmerle.Google Scholar
Morris, Richard. 1989. “Word order and discourse salience in the Old High German Muspilli.” Leuvense bijdragen 78. 129144.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles. 1931. Principles of philosophy. Collected papers. Vol. 1. Hartshore, Charles and Weiss, Paul, eds. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles. 1932. Elements of logic. Collected papers. Vol. 2. Hartshorne, Charles and Weiss, Paul, eds. Cambridge MA: Harvard Univ Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles. 1934. Pragmatism and pragmatics. Collected papers. Vol. 5. Hartshorne, Charles and Weiss, Paul, eds. Cambridge MA: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles. 1935. Scientific metaphysics. Collected papers. Vol. 6. Hartshorne, Charles and Weiss, Paul, eds. Cambridge MA: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Pratje, H. 1880. Dative und Instrumentalis im Heliand unter Berücksichtigung der Ergebnisse der vergleichenden Sprachforschung syntaktisch dargestellt. Soberhein: G. Hoehnen.Google Scholar
Purdy, Karen. 1986. The special reflexive dative in the Old Saxon Helian and Genesis. Diss., University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Rauch, Irmengard. 1981a. “Inversion, adjextive participle, and narrative effect in Old Saxon.” Jahrbuch des Vereins für niederdeutsche Sprachforschung 104:2230.Google Scholar
Rauch, Irmengard. 1981b. “What is cause?Journal of Indo-European studies 9, 34:328–334.Google Scholar
Reimsdijk, Henk van and Williams, Edwin. 1986. Introduction to the theory of grammar. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Scholtissek, Gisela. 1980. Der sogenannte reflexive Dativ im Altsächsischen. Diss., University of Gießen.Google Scholar
Sehrt, Edward H. 1966. Vollständiges Wörterbuchzum Heliand und zur altsächsischen Genesis. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht. Rpt. of ed. of 1925.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Michael. 1983. The sense of grammar. Indiana Univ. Press: Bloomington.Google Scholar