Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T09:58:18.147Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Rise of the To-Infinitive. By Bettelou Los. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2007. Pp. xvii–335. Paperback. £24.99. doi:10.1017/S1470542708000159

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2008

Gema Chocano
Gema Chocano*
Affiliation:
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
*
Departamento de Filología Inglesa, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Francisco Toms y Valiente, 1, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria de Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, SPAIN, [gema.chocano@uam.es]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
REVIEWS
Information
Journal of Germanic Linguistics , Volume 20 , Issue 4 , December 2008 , pp. 351 - 357
Copyright
Society for Germanic Linguistics 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bayer, Josef, & Kornfilt, Jaklin. 1990. Restructuring effects in German. Parametric variation in Germanic and Romance: Proceedings from a DYANA workshop, September 1989, ed. by Engdahl, Elisabet, Reape, Mike, Mellor, Martin, & Cooper, Richard, 21–42. Edinburgh: Centre for Cognitive Science, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
den Besten, Hans, & Rutten, Jan. 1989. On verb raising, extraposition, and free word order in Dutch. Sentential complementation and the lexicon: Studies in honour of Wim de Geest, ed. by Jasper, Dany, Klooster, Wim, Putseys, Yvan, & Seuren, Pieter, 41–56. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Bock, Helmut. 1931. Studien zum präpositionalen Infinitiv und Akkusativ mit dem to-Infinitiv. Anglia 55.115–249.Google Scholar
Bošković, Željko. 1997. The syntax of non-finite complementation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Callaway, Morgan. 1913. The infinitive in Anglo-Saxon. Washington, DC: Carnegie Institution of Washington.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, & Lasnik, Howard. 1993. The theory of principles and parameters. Syn tax: An international handbook of contemporary research, ed. by Jacobs, Joachim, von Stechow, Arnim, Wolfgang, Sternefeld, & Venneman, Theo, 506–569. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, Paul. 1991. Effects of head movement on theories of subjacency and proper government. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Boston, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Los, Bettelou. 1999. Infinitival complementation in Old and Middle English. The Hague: Thesus.Google Scholar
Martin, Roger. 2001. Null case and the distribution of PRO. Linguistic Inquiry 32.141–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noonan, Michael. 1985. Complementation. Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 2, ed. by Shopen, Timothy, 42–120. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey K. 1982. Syncategorematicity and English infinitival to. Glossa 16.181–215.Google Scholar