Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-768ffcd9cc-jpcp9 Total loading time: 0.328 Render date: 2022-12-06T21:39:08.695Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

An unlevel playing field: national income estimates and reciprocal comparison in global economic history

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2012

Morten Jerven
Affiliation:
School for International Studies, Simon Fraser University, 7200-515 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, BC, V6B 5K3, Canada E-mail: mjerven@sfu.ca

Abstract

If we take recent income per capita estimates at face value, they imply that the average medieval European was at least five times ‘better off’ than the average Congolese today. This raises important questions regarding the meaning and applicability of national income estimates throughout time and space, and their use in the analysis of global economic history over the long term. This article asks whether national income estimates have a historical and geographical specificity that renders the ‘data’ increasingly unsuitable and misleading when assessed outside a specific time and place. Taking the concept of ‘reciprocal comparison’ as a starting point, it further questions whether national income estimates make sense in pre-and post-industrial societies, in decentralized societies, and in polities outside the temperate zone. One of the major challenges in global history is Eurocentrism. Resisting the temptation to compare the world according to the most conventional development measure might be a recommended step in overcoming this bias.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Pomeranz, Kenneth, The great divergence: China, Europe, and the making of the modern world, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000Google Scholar. For one recent attempt at quantitative resolution see Roy, Tirthankar, ‘Economic conditions in early modern Bengal: a contribution to the divergence debate’, Journal of Economic History, 70, 1, 2010, pp. 179–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar; see also the papers deriving from the project ‘Historical patterns of development and underdevelopment: origins and persistence of the great divergence’, http://www.cepr.org/research/HIPOD.htm (consulted 19 September 2011).

2 Maddison, Angus, Contours of the world economy, 1–2030 AD: essays in macro-economic history, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007Google Scholar. Maddison's work continues to be revised and expanded under the auspices of the ‘Maddison Project’: see http://www.ggdc.net/maddison/maddison-project/ (consulted 9 December 2011).

3 For a basic introduction to the technicalities of the measure, see Lequiller, François and Blades, Derek, Understanding national accounts, Paris: OECD, 2007Google Scholar.

4 A premise shared with a article recently published in this journal: Speich, Daniel, ‘The use of global abstractions: national income accounting in the period of imperial decline’, Journal of Global History, 6, 1, 2011, pp. 7–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Austin, G., ‘The “reversal of fortune” thesis and the compression of history: perspectives from African and comparative economic history’, Journal of International Development, 20, 8, 2008, pp. 996–1027CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 This article will focus on GDP estimates. Others have explored the use of alternative measures, most notably real wages, which may also have significant biases. For a review of recent contributions in this direction, see Booth, Anne, ‘Review article: living standards in the past: new perspectives on well-being in Asia and Europe’, Journal of Global History, 1, 2, 2006, pp. 289–92Google Scholar.

7 The principle gained currency with the work of Wong, R. Bin, China transformed: historical change and the limits of European experience, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1997Google Scholar, was forcefully restated by Pomeranz, Great divergence (in particular pp. 8–10), and was more recently adapted to the study of Africa by Austin, Gareth, ‘Reciprocal comparison and African history: tackling conceptual Eurocentrism in the study of Africa's economic past’, African Studies Review, 50, 3, December 2007, pp. 1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Maddison, Contours, p. 1.

9 European Review of Economic History, Symposium on Gregory Clark's A Farewell to Alms, 12, 2, 2008.

10 Persson, Karl Gunnar, ‘The Malthus delusion’, European Review of Economic History, 12, 2, pp. 165–73Google Scholar, esp. p. 166.

11 Clark, Gregory, ‘In defense of the Malthusian interpretation of history’, European Review of Economic History, 12, 2, pp. 175–99Google Scholar, esp. p. 177.

12 Gerschenkron, A., Economic backwardness in historical perspective: a book of essays, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1962Google Scholar, quoted in Platt, D. C. M., Mickey Mouse numbers in world history: the short view, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1989, p. 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 O’Brien, Patrick K., ‘The reconstruction, rehabilitation and reconfiguration of the British Industrial Revolution as a conjuncture in global history’, Itinerario, 24, 2000, pp. 117–34Google Scholar.

14 Pomeranz, Great divergence, pp. 29–68, makes the case for the levels of material advancement in Europe and Asia as having ‘surprising resemblances’.

15 Crafts, N., ‘Productivity growth in the Industrial Revolution: a new growth accounting perspective’, Journal of Economic History, 64, 2004, pp. 521–35Google Scholar.

16 For a classic statement of European superiority, see Jones, Eric L., The European miracle: environments, economies and geopolitics in the history of Europe and Asia, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981Google Scholar; Landes, D., The wealth and poverty of nations: why some are so rich and some so poor, New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company Inc., 1998Google Scholar; North, D., Institutions, institutional change and economic performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Maddison, Contours.

18 These data include North Africa and are in 1990 international dollars. The data for ‘Sahel and West Africa’ and ‘Rest of Africa’ are completely stagnant at 415 dollars throughout those years. Ibid., p. 185.

19 There is some evidence of cash-crop-related growth for Ghana. Historical estimates are available for 1891, 1901, and 1911, and these show rapid growth in the period. For further discussion, see Jerven, Morten, ‘African growth recurring: an economic history perspective on African growth episodes, 1690–2010’, Economic History of Developing Regions, 25, 2, 2010, pp. 127–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20 Manning, Patrick, ‘The prospects for African economic history: is today included in the long run?’, African Studies Review, 30, 1987, pp. 49–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

21 See recent new estimates for medieval Britain in Stephen Broadberry, Bruce Campbell, Alexander Klein, Mark Overton, and Bas van Leeuwen, ‘British economic growth, 1270–1870’, unpublished paper presented at the Third European Congress on World and Global History, London School of Economics, April 2011, http://www2.lse.ac.uk/economicHistory/pdf/Broadberry/BritishGDPLongRun.pdf (consulted 9 December 2011), p. 61.

22 The lowest income recorded in the Maddison dataset is for Sri Lanka in 1820, at 83 dollars per capita. The second lowest was recorded for Congo (Kinshasa) in 2001, at 207 dollars.

23 Holcombe, Randall G., ‘National income accounting and public policy’, Review of Austrian Economics, 17, 4, 2004, pp. 387–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

24 Ward, Michael, Quantifying the world: UN ideas and statistics, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2004Google Scholar.

25 Organisation for European Economic Cooperation, A standardized system of national accounts, OEEC: Paris, 1952Google Scholar; United Nations Statistical Office, A system of national accounts and supporting tables, UN: New York, 1953Google Scholar.

26 Ward, Quantifying the world, p. 45.

27 Seers, Dudley, ‘The political economy of national accounting’,in Cairncross, Alec and Puri, Mohiner, eds., Employment, income distribution and development strategy: problems of the developing countries, New York: Holmes and Meier, 1976, p. 193Google Scholar. Seers first published his criticism of the system in Seers, Dudley, ‘The role of national income estimates in the statistical policy of an under-developed area’, Review of Economic Studies, 20, 3, 1952–53, pp. 159–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

28 See, among others, Lewis, W. A., ‘Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour’, Manchester School 1954, 22, 2, 1954, pp. 139–91Google Scholar.

29 Seers, ‘Political economy’, pp. 195–9.

30 Rostow, W. W., Stages of economic growth: a non-communist manifesto, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1960Google Scholar.

31 Balasubramanyam, V. N., The economy of India, London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1984Google Scholar.

32 Easterly, W., ‘The ghost of financing gap: testing the growth model used in the international financial institutions’, Journal of Development Economics, 60, 1999, pp. 423–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

33 Leontieff, Wassily W., The structure of the American economy, 1919–1929: an empirical application of equilibrium analysis, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1941, pp. 21Google Scholar.

34 Ibid.

35 Ibid.

36 Broadberry, Stephen, The productivity race: British manufacturing in international perspective, 1850–1990, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

37 For a discussion of the categorization of recent Indian growth, see for instance Rashmi Banga, ‘Critical issues in India's service-led growth’, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER) Working Paper 171, October 2005, http://www.icrier.org/pdf/WP171.pdf (consulted 9 December 2011).

38 David Washbrook notes the strong standing of the service sector in pre-modern India in ‘Colonialism, globalization and the economy of South-east India, c.1700–1900’, Working Papers of the Global Economic History Network (GEHN) 24/06, 2006, eprints.lse.ac.uk/22466/1/wp24.pdf (consulted 9 December 2011).

39 UNDP, Human Development Report, Oxford: Oxford University Press, published annually since 1990Google Scholar.

40 Sen, Amartya, ‘Human Development Index’,in Clark, David A., ed., The Elgar companion to development studies, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2006, pp. 256–60Google Scholar.

41 J. E. Stiglitz, ‘Towards a new paradigm for development: strategies, policies, and processes’, Prebisch Lecture at UNCTAD, Geneva, 1998, https://ceaemgmt.colorado.edu/ceae/images/File/mcedc/prebisch98.pdf (consulted 9 December 2011).

42 Jolly, Richard, ‘The MDGs in historical perspective’, IDS Bulletin, 41, 1, January 2010, pp. 48–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

43 Pritchett, Lant, ‘Divergence, big time’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11, 3, 1997 pp. 3–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kenny, Charles, ‘Why are we worried about income? Nearly everything that matters is converging’, World Development, 33, 2005, pp. 1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

44 Rostow's Stages of economic growth, which hails from the same period and place as the national income estimation method, does this as well. Easterly, in the ‘The ghost of financing gap’, is one of many critics of this view of development.

45 The most famous statement of the variation across the time axis was simply that ‘late development will be different’, paraphrasing Gerschenkron, Economic backwardness.

46 Stern, Nicholas, ‘The economics of development: a survey’, Economic Journal, 99, 597, 1989, p. 685CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

47 Taylor, Alan M. and Taylor, Mark P., ‘The Purchasing Power Parity debate’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18, 4, 2004, pp. 135–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

48 Deaton, Angus and Heston, Alan, ‘Understanding PPPs and PPP-based national accounts’, American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2, 4, 2010, pp. 1–35Google Scholar.

49 The last round was in 2005, and the next round is planned to finalize in 2011. See http://siteresources.worldbank.org/ICPEXT/Resources/ICP_2011.html (consulted 9 December 2011).

50 Ma, Debin, Fukao, Kyoji, and Yuan, Tangjun, ‘Real GDP in pre-war East Asia: a 1934–36 benchmark Purchasing Power Parity comparison with the U.S.’, Review of Income and Wealth, 53, 3, 2007, pp. 503–37Google Scholar.

51 Robert C. Feenstra, Hong Ma, C. Peter Neary, and D. S. Prasada Rao, ‘How big is China? and other puzzles in the measurement of real GDP’, University of California at Davis, March 2010, http://www.econ.ucdavis.edu/faculty/fzfeens/pdf/Feenstra_Ma_Neary_Rao_2010_Oxford.pdf (consulted 9 December 2011).

52 Bhalla, Surjit S., ‘World Bank: most Asians dead in 1950’, Business Standard, 23 August 2008Google Scholar.

53 Durlauf, Steven N., Johnson, Paul A., and Temple, Jonathan R. W., ‘Growth econometrics’,in Aghion, Philippe and Durlauf, Steven N., eds., Handbook of Economic Growth, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2005, pp. 555–667Google Scholar.

54 Dawson, John W., DeJuan, Joseph P., Seater, John J., and Stephenson, E. Frank, ‘Economic information versus quality variation in cross-country data’, Canadian Journal of Economics, 34, 3, 2001, pp. 988–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

55 For a study of different distributions of African GDP, see Jerven, Morten, ‘The relativity of poverty and income: how reliable are African economic statistics?’ African Affairs, 109, 434, 2010, pp. 77–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

56 A comparison of the growth rates in Penn World Tables, Maddison, and World Development Indicators for a sample of African economies was made by Jerven, Morten, ‘Random growth in Africa? Lessons from an evaluation of the growth evidence on Botswana, Kenya, Tanzania and Zambia, 1965–1995’, Journal of Development Studies, 46, 2, 2010, pp. 274–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

57 Simon Johnson, William Larson, Chris Papageorgiou, and Arvind Subramanian, ‘Is newer better? Penn World Table revisions and their impact on growth estimates’, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 15455, 2009, http://baselinescenario.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/jlps_oct-2009-final.pdf (consulted 9 December 2011).

58 Ciccone, Antonio and Jarocinksi, Marek, ‘Determinants of economic growth: will data tell?’, American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2, 4, 2010, pp. 223–47Google Scholar.

59 Angus, Deaton, ‘Price indexes, inequality, and the measurement of world poverty’, American Economic Review, 100, 1, 2010, pp. 5–34Google Scholar.

60 Hopkins, Antony G., An economic history of West Africa, Longmans: London, 1973, pp. 13–14Google Scholar.

61 The lack of cattle due to tsetse-borne trypanosomes, causing trypanosomiasis, is specific to the African tropics. Non-tsetse-borne trypanosomes existed elsewhere in the tropics, but essentially affected equids rather than bovids.

62 As laid out by Landes, Wealth and poverty, and by Bloom, David E. and Sachs, Jeffrey D., ‘Geography, demography, and economic growth in Africa’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 29, 1998, pp. 207–96Google Scholar.

63 The International Comparison Project uses market prices, instead of farm gate prices, when creating the PPP terms, thereby overestimating the poverty of all those who consume commodities that they themselves produce.

64 The most influential and recent version of this argument was put forward by Sokoloff, Kenneth L. and Engerman, Stanley L., ‘History lessons: institutions, factor endowments, and paths of development in the New World’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14, 3, 2000, pp. 217–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

65 Sugihara, Kaoru, ‘The East Asian path of economic development: a long-term perspective’,in Arrighi, Giovanni, Hamashita, Takeshi, and Selden, Mark, eds., The resurgence of East Asia: 500, 150 and 50 year perspectives, Routledge: London, 2003, pp. 78–123Google Scholar.

66 Bray, Francesca, The rice economies: technology and development in Asian societies, Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press, 1986Google Scholar; or eadem, ‘Patterns of evolution in rice-growing societies’, Journal of Peasant Studies, 11, 1984, pp. 3–33.

67 Chandavarkar, Rajnarayan, ‘Industrialization in India before 1947: conventional approaches and alternative perspectives’, Modern Asian Studies, 19, 3, 1985, pp. 623–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

68 Alvarez-Nogal, Carlos and de la Escosura, Leandro Prados, ‘The decline of Spain (1500–1850): conjectural estimates’, European Review of Economic History, 11, 3, 2007, pp. 319–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

69 Ibid., p. 320.

70 Jean-Pascal Bassino, Stephen Broadberry, Kyoji Fukao, Bishnupriya Gupta, and Masanori Takashima, ‘Japan and the great divergence, 730–1872’, unpublished paper presented at the Third European Congress on World and Global History, London School of Economics and Political Science, April 2011.

71 Francks, Penelope, Rural economic development in Japan: from the nineteenth century to the Pacific War, New York: Routledge, 2006Google Scholar.

72 Ma, Debin, ‘The modern silk road: the global raw-silk market, 1850–1930’, Journal of Economic History, 56, 2, 1996, pp. 330–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

73 Broadberry et al., ‘British economic growth’, 2009 version, unpublished paper presented at the World Economic History Congress, August 2009, Utrecht, table 24. (The 2011 version of the paper does not provide estimates for Britain in the year 1500.)

74 Broadberry et al., ‘British economic growth’, 2011 version, p. 35.

75 Pomeranz, Great divergence, p. 32.

76 Ibid., pp. 32–6.

77 Austin, Gareth, ‘Resources, techniques and strategies south of the Sahara: revising the factor endowments perspective on African economic development, 1500–2000’, Economic History Review, 61, 3, 2008, pp. 587–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

78 Although Austin makes the crucial distinction that labour scarcity was subject to seasonal variation.

79 With some important exceptions where land usage was intensive, such as in Rwanda and Ethiopia.

80 Stolper, Wolfgang F., Planning without facts: lessons in resource allocation from Nigeria's development, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1966, p. 21CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

81 Herbst, Jeffrey, States and power in Africa: comparative lessons in authority and control, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000Google Scholar.

82 Gardner, Leigh A., ‘Decentralisation and corruption in historical perspective: evidence from tax collection in British Colonial Africa’, Economic History of Developing Regions, 25, 2, 2010, pp. 213–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

83 Federation of Rhodesia and Nyasaland, Monthly Digest of Statistics, Salisbury, 1955.

84 Republic of Zambia, National Accounts 1964–1967, Lusaka.

85 Mamdani, Mahmood, Citizen and subject: contemporary Africa and the legacy of late colonialism, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996Google Scholar; Englebert, Pierre, State legitimacy and development in Africa, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2001Google Scholar.

86 Hibou, Béatrice, Privatizing the state, New York: Columbia University Press, 2004Google Scholar.

87 MacGaffey, Janet, The real economy of Zaire: the contribution of smuggling and other unofficial activities to national wealth, London: James Currey, 1991, p. 11Google Scholar.

88 Titeca, Kristof and de Herdt, Tom, ‘Real governance beyond the “failed state”: negotiating education in the Democratic Republic of the Congo’, African Affairs, 110, 439, 2011, pp. 213–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

89 Morten Jerven, ‘Random growth’; idem, ‘Relativity of poverty’.

90 Ghana Statistical Service, Rebasing of Ghana's National Accounts to Reference Year 2006, Accra, 2010.

91 Data provided in Table 1 above.

92 Joseph Stiglitz, Amartya Sen, and Jean Paul Fitoussi, ‘Report of the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress’, presented 14 September 2009, http://media.ft.com/cms/f3b4c24a-a141-11de-a88d-00144feabdc0.pdf (consulted 9 December 2011), p. 60.

93 Ibid., p. 137.

94 Hill, Polly, Development economics on trial: the anthropological case for a prosecution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

95 See, for instance, Berry, Sarah, ‘The food crisis and agrarian change in Africa: a review essay’, African Studies Review, 27, 2, 1984, pp. 59–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Carr-Hill, Roy A., Social conditions in Sub-Saharan Africa, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1990, esp. pp. 39–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

96 Hill, Development economics, p. 34.

97 Ibid.

98 Thornton, John, ‘Precolonial African industry and the Atlantic trade, 1500–1800’, African Economic History, 19, 1990–91, pp. 1–19Google Scholar.

99 Hogendorn, Jan S. and Gemery, Henry A., ‘Assessing productivity in precolonial African agriculture and industry, 1500–1800’, African Economic History, 19, 1990–91, pp. 31–5, esp. p. 31Google Scholar.

100 McDougall, E. Ann, ‘Production in precolonial Africa’, African Economic History Review, 19, 1990–91, pp. 37–43Google Scholar.

101 ‘Substantivism’ refers to the proposition, first put forward by Karl Polanyi, that both rational decision-making and the logic of economic scarcity are society-specific.

102 Frankel, S. Herbert, ‘Psychic and accounting concepts of income and welfare’, Oxford Economic Papers, 4, 1, 1952, pp. 1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

103 Sahlins, Marshall David, Stone Age economics, Chicago, IL: Aldine-Atherton, 1972Google Scholar.

104 For a discussion of the extent of ‘economic rationality’ in feudal systems, see Kula, Witold, An economic theory of the feudal system: towards a model of the Polish economy, London: N.L.B., 1976, esp. chs. 6 and 7Google Scholar.

105 Hopkins, An economic history of West Africa and Austin, ‘Resources, techniques and strategies’.

106 Goody, Jack, ‘Feudalism in Africa?’, The Journal of African History, 4, 1, 1963, pp. 1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Goody, Jack, ‘Economy and feudalism in Africa’, The Economic History Review, New Series, 22, 3, Dec., 1969, pp. 393–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

107 Maddison, Contours, p. 1.

108 Platt, Mickey Mouse numbers.

19
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

An unlevel playing field: national income estimates and reciprocal comparison in global economic history
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

An unlevel playing field: national income estimates and reciprocal comparison in global economic history
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

An unlevel playing field: national income estimates and reciprocal comparison in global economic history
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *