Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T01:21:34.317Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Recognition Decrees for the Delphian Soteria and the Date of Smyrna's Inviolability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 October 2013

Sue Elwyn
Sue Elwyn
Affiliation:
Graduate Group in Ancient History, University of Pennsylvania
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Seven inscriptions have been classified as recognition decrees for the Delphian Soteria. One of these is so fragmentary as to defy analysis. In a second, only the end of the decree survives, and relatively little can be learned from it. The other five decrees have been the subject of considerable disagreement since Pomtow's publication in 1914.

Type
Notes
Information
The Journal of Hellenic Studies , Volume 110 , November 1990 , pp. 177 - 180
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Most recently published by Nachtergael, G., Corpus des actes relatifs aux Sôtéria de Delphes (henceforth referred to as Actes ), nos. 21–7Google Scholar, in Les Galates en Grèce et les Sôtéria de Delphes (Brussels, 1977) henceforth referred to as Nachtergael [1977]) 435–47.

2 Actes 27.

3 Actes 26.

4 Pomtow, H., Klio xiv (1914–1915) 271–5Google Scholar, nos. 1–4 = Actes 22. 5; Actes 21, from Athens, was first published by Koumanoudis, A., Ἐπιγραϕαὶ Ἕλλην. ἀνέκδοτοι (Athens, 1881) 75.Google Scholar For a summary of the various debates, see Nachtergael (1977) 209–33.

5 Historia xxv (1976) 62–78 (henceforth referred to as Nachtergael [1976]), especially 71–3, and Nachtergael (1977) 223 41.

6 Nachtergael (1976) 71–2.

7 Meritt, B. D., Hesperia i (1981) 80–2.Google Scholar

8 See, among others, Habicht, C., Untersuchungen zur politischen Geschichte Athens im 3. Jahrhundert v. Chr. = Vestigia xxx (1979).Google Scholar

9 Nachtergael (1976) 72–3 n. 82.

10 BCH liv (1930) 326–32.

11 Historia v.2 (1931) 241–60.

12 Will, E., Histoire politique du monde hellénistique 2nd edition (Nancy, 1979) vol. iGoogle Scholar (henceforth referred to as Will), 247–8; 249–50.

13 Robert (n. 10) 327 n. 3.

14 Ferguson, W. S., Athenian tribal cycles in the Hellenistic age (Cambridge, Mass., 1932) 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

15 Robert (n. 10) 326 n. 1 and 327 n. 3.

16 i.4.4.

17 Robert (n. 10) 327 n. 3.

18 e.g. Inschr. v. Magn. 45, 46, 61.

19 e.g. Inschr. v. Magn. 40, 41.

20 e.g. SGDI 5165–75.

21 Will 248–61.

22 Will 248–61, especially 259–61.

23 Will 294–6.

24 Will 294–6.

25 Will 296–301.

26 The sacred envoys left Delphi in the month of Bysios. Daux, G., REG lxii (1949) 1 n.Google Scholar I and Rougemont, G., BCH xcvii (1973) 89–99.Google Scholar