Skip to main content Accessibility help

A multi-method approach to study robustness of social–ecological systems: the case of small-scale irrigation systems



Elinor Ostrom was a leader in using multiple methods to perform institutional analysis. In this paper, we discuss how a multi-method approach she pioneered may be used to study the robustness of social–ecological systems. We synthesize lessons learned from a series of studies on small-scale irrigation systems in which we use case-study analysis, experimental methods in laboratory and field settings, and mathematical models. The accumulated insights show the importance of creating institutional arrangements that fit the human ecology within the biophysical constraints of the system. The examples of work based on multiple methods approaches presented here highlight several lessons. For example, experimental work helps us better understand the details of how the ability to maintain trust relationships, low levels of inequality, and low transaction costs of coordination are critical for success. Likewise, the integration of case-study analysis and modeling helps us better understand how systems that can leverage biophysical characteristics to help address challenges of monitoring, sanctioning, and coordination may be able to increase their chances of success.


Corresponding author


Hide All
Anderies, J. M. (2006), ‘Robustness, institutions, and large-scale change in social-ecological systems: The Hohokam of the Phoenix basin’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 2 (2): 133155.
Anderies, J. M., Janssen, M. A., Lee, A., and Wasserman, H. (in press), ‘Environmental variability and collective action: Experimental insights from an irrigation game’, Ecological Economics.
Anderies, J. M., Janssen, M. A., and Ostrom, E. (2004), ‘A framework to analyze the robustness of social-ecological systems from an institutional perspective’, Ecology and Society, 9 (1): 18.
Andrew, N. L., Béné, C., Hall, S. J., Allison, E. H., Heck, S., and Ratner, B. D. (2007), ‘Diagnosis and management of small-scale fisheries in developing countries’, Fish and Fisheries, 8 (3): 227240.
Araral, E. (2009), ‘What explains collective action in the commons? Theory and evidence from the Philippines’, World Development, 37 (3): 687697.
Araral, E. (2013), ‘Does geography matter to institutional choice? A comparative study of ancient commons’, Geoforum, 44: 224231.
Barker, R. and Molle, F. (2004), Evolution of irrigation in South and Southeast Asia. Technical report, IWMI. Comprehensive Assessment Research, No. 5.
Bastakoti, R. C. and Shivakoti, G. P. (2012), ‘Rules and collective action: An institutional analysis of the performance of irrigation systems in Nepal’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 8 (2): 225246.
Bodin, Ö., Crona, B., and Ernstson, H. (2006), ‘Social networks in natural resource management: What is there to learn from a structural perspective’, Ecology and Society, 11 (2): r2.
Carlson, J. M. and Doyle, J. (2002), ‘Complexity and robustness’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 99 (suppl. 1): 25382545.
Cifdaloz, O., Regmi, A., Anderies, J. M., and Rodriguez, A. A. (2010), ‘Robustness, vulnerability, and adaptive capacity in small-scale social-ecological systems: The Pumpa irrigation system in Nepal’, Ecology and Society, 15 (3): 39.
Cinner, J., Marnane, M. J., McClanahan, T. R., and Almany, G. R. (2006), ‘Periodic closures as adaptive coral reef management in the Indo-Pacific’, Ecology and Society, 11 (1): 31.
Cox, M. (2012), ‘Diagnosing institutional fit: A formal perspective’, Ecology and Society, 17 (4): 54.
Cox, M., Arnold, G., and Villamayor Tomás, S. (2010), ‘A review of design principles for community-based natural resource management’, Ecology and Society, 15 (4): 38.
Csete, M. E. and Doyle, J. C. (2002), ‘Reverse engineering of biological complexity’, Science, 295: 16641669.
Duit, A. and Galaz, V. (2008), ‘Governance and complexity – emerging issues for governance theory’, Governance, 21 (3): 311335.
Ekstrom, J. A. and Young, O. R. (2009), ‘Evaluating functional fit between a set of institutions and an ecosystem’, Ecology and Society, 14 (2): 16.
Folke, C. (2006), ‘Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social – ecological systems analyses’, Global Environmental Change, 16 (3): 253267.
Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., and Norberg, J. (2005), ‘Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems’, Annual Review of Environmental Resources, 30: 441473.
Folke, C., , L. Pritchard Jr., Berkes, F., Colding, J., and Svedin, U. (2007), ‘The problem of fit between ecosystems and institutions: Ten years later’, Ecology and Society, 12 (1): 30.
Gallopın, G. C. (2006), ‘Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity’, Global Environmental Change, 16 (3): 293303.
Gordon, H. S. (1954), ‘The economic theory of a common-property resource: The fishery’, Journal of Political Economy, 62 (2): 124142.
Hardin, G. (1968), ‘The tragedy of the commons’, Science, 162: 12431248.
Holling, C. S. (1973), ‘Resilience and stability of ecological systems’, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4: 123.
Hunt, R. C. (1988), ‘Size and structure of authority in canal irrigation systems’, Journal of Anthropological Research, 44 (4): 335355.
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2007), Climate change: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability, contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Technical report, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
Janssen, M. A., Bousquet, F., Cardenas, J. C., Castillo, D., and Worrapimphong, K. (2012), ‘Field experiments of irrigation dilemmas’, Agricultural Systems, 109: 6575.
Kiser, L. and Ostrom, E. (1982), ‘The three worlds of action: A meta-theoretical synthesis of institutional approaches’, in Ostrom, E. (ed.), Strategies of Political Inquiry, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 179222.
Lam, W. F. (1998), Governing Irrigation Systems in Nepal: Institutions, Infrastructure, and Collective Action, Oakland, CA: ICS Press.
Lansing, J. S. (1991), Priests and Programmers: Technologies of Power in the Engineered Landscape of Bali, Princeton University Press.
Lyson, T. A. (2004), Civic Agriculture: Reconnecting Farm, Food, and Community, Medford, MA: Tufts University Press.
McCay, B. J. and Acheson, J. M. (eds.) (1987), The Question of the Commons: The Culture & Ecology of Communal Resources, Tuscan: University of Arizona Press.
McIntyre, B. D., Herren, H. R., Wakhungu, J., and Watson, R. T. (eds.) (2009), International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD): Global Report. Washington, DC, USA: IAASTD.
Moser, S. C. and Ekstrom, J. A. (2010), ‘A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107 (51): 2202622031.
Myint, T. (2012), Governing International Rivers: Polycentric Politics in the Mekong and the Rhine, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Inc.
Olson, M. (1965), The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ostrom, E. (1965), Public entrepreneurship: A case study in ground water basin management, PhD dissertation, University of California-Los Angeles.
Ostrom, E. (1986), ‘An agenda for the study of institutions’, Public Choice, 48 (1): 325.
Ostrom, E. (1990), Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Ostrom, E. (1992), Crafting Institutions for Self-Governing Irrigation Systems, San Francisco, CA: ICS Press.
Ostrom, E., and Gardner, R. (1993), ‘Copying with Asymmetries in the Commons: Self-Governing Irrigation Systems Can Work’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7 (4): 93112.
Ostrom, E., Lam, W.-F., and Pradhan, P. (2011), Improving Irrigation in Asia: Sustainable Performance of an Innovative Intervention in Nepal. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Paavola, J. (2007), ‘Institutions and environmental governance: A reconceptualization’, Ecological Economics, 63 (1): 93103.
Plummer, R. and Armitage, D. (2007), ‘A resilience-based framework for evaluating adaptive co-management: Linking ecology, economics and society in a complex world’, Ecological Economics, 61 (1): 6274.
Poteete, A. M., Janssen, M. A., and Ostrom, E. (2010), Working Together: Collective Action, the Commons and Multiple Methods in Practice, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Pretty, J. (1999), The Living Land: Agriculture, Food and Community Regeneration in the 21st Century. London, UK: Earthscan Publications.
Rammel, C., Stagl, S., and Wilfing, H. (2007), ‘Managing complex adaptive systems – a co-evolutionary perspective on natural resource management’, Ecological Economics, 63 (1): 921.
Raymond, C. M., Bryan, B. A., MacDonald, D. H., Cast, A., Strathearn, S., Grandgirard, A., and Kalivas, T. (2009), ‘Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services’, Ecological Economics, 68 (5): 13011315.
Scott, A. (1955), ‘The fishery: The objectives of sole ownership’, Journal of Political Economy, 63 (2): 116124.
Shivakoti, G. P. and Bastakoti, R. C. (2006), ‘The robustness of Montane irrigation systems of Thailand in a dynamic human-water resources interface’. Journal of Institutional Economics, 2 (2): 227247.
Shivakoti, G. P. and Ostrom, E. (eds.) (2002), Improving Irrigation Governance and Management in Nepal, Oakland, CA: ICS Press.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2012), The Price of Inequality: How Today's Divided Society Endangers our Future, New York, NY, USA: W. W. Norton & Company.
Thornton, P., Jones, P., Alagarswamy, A., and Andresen, J. (2009), ‘Spatial variation of crop yield responses to climate change in east Africa’, Global Environmental Change, 19: 5465.
Trawick, P. B. (2001), ‘Successfully governing the commons: Principles of social organization in an andean irrigation system’, Human Ecology, 29 (1): 125.
Wallingford, H. R. (1997), Priorities for Irrigated Agriculture. Occasional Paper No. 1. Department of International Development, UK.
Young, O. R. (2002), The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change: Fit, Interplay, and Scale, Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

A multi-method approach to study robustness of social–ecological systems: the case of small-scale irrigation systems



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.