Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-ssw5r Total loading time: 0.293 Render date: 2022-08-17T01:19:18.370Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Re-evaluating community policing in a polycentric system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 September 2015

PETER J. BOETTKE*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA
JAYME S. LEMKE*
Affiliation:
Mercatus Center, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA
LIYA PALAGASHVILI*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, SUNY-Purchase College, Purchase, NY, USA

Abstract

Elinor Ostrom and her colleagues in The Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis at Indiana University in Bloomington conducted fieldwork in metropolitan police departments across the United States. Their findings in support of community policing dealt a blow to the popular belief that consolidation and centralization of services was the only way to effectively provide citizens with public goods. However, subsequent empirical literature suggests that the widespread implementation of community policing has been generally ineffective and in many ways unsustainable. We argue that the failures are the result of strategic interplay between federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies that has resulted in the prioritization of federal over community initiatives, the militarization of domestic police, and the erosion of genuine community-police partnerships.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Millennium Economics Ltd 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aligica, P. and Boettke, P. J. (2009), Challenging Institutional Analysis and Development: The Bloomington School, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Anderson, W. and Weidner, E. W. (1950), American City Government, New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Balko, R. (2014), Rise of the Warrior Cop: The Militarization of America's Police Forces, New York: PublicAffairs.Google Scholar
Benson, B., Rasmussen, D. W., and Sollars, D. L. (1995), ‘Police Bureaucracies, their Incentives, and the War on Drugs’, Public Choice, 83 (1–2): 2145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bish, R. L. (1971), The Political Economy of Metropolitan Areas, Chicago: Markham.Google Scholar
Bish, R. L. and Ostrom, V. (1973), Understanding Urban Government: Metropolitan Reform Reconsidered. Washington DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. M. and Tullock, G. (1962), The Calculus of Consent, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cordner, G. (2004), ‘The Survey Data: What they say and Don't say about Community Policing’, in Fridell, L. and Wycoff, M. A. (eds.), Community Policing: The Past, Present, and Future, Washington, DC: Annie E. Casey Foundation, Police Executive Research Forum, pp. 7282.Google Scholar
Council of State Governments and Eastern Kentucky University (2005), ‘The Impact of Terrorism on State Law Enforcement: Adjusting to New Roles and Changing Conditions. Final Report’, http://www.csg.org/knowledgecenter/docs/Misc0506Terrorism.pdf [accessed 15 November 2013].Google Scholar
Evans, W. N. and Owens, E. G. (2007), ‘COPS and Crime’, Journal of Public Economics, 91 (1): 181201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, J. R. (2000), ‘Community Policing in America: Changing the Nature, Structure, and Function of the Police’, Criminal Justice, 3: 299370.Google Scholar
Grinc, R. M. (1994), ‘“Angels in Marble”: Problems in Stimulating Community Involvement in Community Policing’, Crime and Delinquency, 30 (3): 437468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, A. R. and Coyne, C. J. (2013), ‘The Militarization of U.S. Domestic Policing’, The Independent Review: A Journal of Political Economy, 17 (4): 485504.Google Scholar
Hawdon, J., Ryan, J. and Griffin, S. (2003), ‘Policing Tactics and Perceptions of Police Legitimacy’, Police Quarterly, 6 (4): 469491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickman, M. and Reaves, B. (2001), ‘Local Police Departments 2000’, Washington DC: US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Ishak, S. T. (1972). Consumers’ Perception of Police Performance: Consolidation vs. Deconcentration, the Case of Grand Rapids, Michigan Metropolitan Area. Ph.D dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Kraska, P. B. (2001), Militarizing the American Criminal Justice System: The Changing Roles of the Armed Forces and the Police, Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Kraska, P. B. (2007), ‘Militarization and Policing—-Its Relevance to 21st Century Police’, Policing, 1 (4): 501513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraska, P. B. and Kappeler, V. E. (1997), ‘Militarizing American Police: The Rise and Normalization of Paramilitary Units’, Social Problems, 44 (1): 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitt, S. D. (2004), ‘Understanding Why Crime Fell in the 1990s: Four Factors That Explain the Decline and Six That Do Not’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18 (1): 163190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, N. E. (1958), ‘The Local Community as an Ecology of Games’, American Journal of Sociology, 64 (3): 251261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubell, M., Henry, A. D., and McCoy, M. (2010), ‘Collaborative Institutions in an Ecology of Games’, American Journal of Political Science, 54 (2): 287300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, W. (2002), ‘Partnerships, Information and Public Safety: Community Policing in a Time of Terror’, Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 25 (3): 530542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mastrofski, S. D. and Willis, J. J. (2010), ‘Police Organization Continuity and Change: Into the Twenty-first Century’, Crime and Justice, 39 (1): 55144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mastrofski, S. D., Willis, J. J., and Kochel, T. R. (2007), ‘The Challenges of Implementing Community Policing in the United States’, Policing, 1 (2): 223234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McElroy, J. E., Cosgrove, C. A., and Sadd, S. (1993), Community Policing: The CPOP in New York. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Morabito, M. S. (2010), ‘Understanding Community Policing as an Innovation: Patterns of Adoption’, Crime & Delinquency, 56 (4): 564587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muhlhausen, D. B. (2001), ‘Do Community Oriented Policing Services Grants Affect Violent Crime Rates?’, Report CDA01-05. Washington, DC: Heritage Foundation.Google Scholar
Muhlhausen, D. B. (2002), ‘Research Challenges Claim of COPS Effectiveness’, Report CDA02-02. Washington, DC: Heritage Foundation.Google Scholar
Muhlhausen, D. B. (2006), ‘Impact Evaluation of COPS Grants in Large Cities.’ Report CDA06-03. Washington, DC: Heritage Foundation.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1983), ‘Analyzing Institutions for the Delivery of Local Collective Goods’, American Society for Public Administration Meetings, New York, April 16–19, 1983. http://hdl.handle.net/10535/886Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1990), Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1998), ‘The Comparative Study of Public Economies’, The American Economist, 42 (1): 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1999), ‘Size and Performance in a Federal System’, in McGinnis, M. D. (ed.), Polycentricity and Local Public Economies: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 232262.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2000), ‘Collective Action and the Evolution of Social Norms’, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14 (3): 137158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2011), ‘Honoring James Buchanan’, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 80 (2): 370373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. and Whitaker, G. (1973), ‘Does Local Community Control of Police make a Difference? Some Preliminary Findings’, American Journal of Political Science, 17 (1): 4876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. and Whitaker, G. (1974), ‘Community Control and Government Responsiveness: The Case of Police in Black Communities’, in McGinnis, M. D. (ed.), Polycentricity and Local Public Economies: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 203231. Originally published in D. Rogers and W. Hawley (eds.), Improving the Quality of Urban Management. Urban Affairs Annual Reviews, 8: 303–334.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E., Baugh, W., Gaurasci, R., Parks, R., and Whitaker, G. (1973), Community Organization and the Provision of Police Services. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E., Gibson, C., Shivakumar, S., and Andersson, K. (2002), Aid, Incentives, and Sustainability: An Institutional Analysis of Development Cooperation. Sida Studies in Evaluation 02/01.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E., Parks, R., and Whitaker, G. (1973), ‘Do We Really Want to Consolidate Urban Police Forces? A Reappraisal of Some Old Assertions’, Public Administration Review, 33 (5): 423432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E., Parks, R., and Whitaker, G. (1978), Patterns of Metropolitan Policing. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Ostrom, V. (1997), The Meaning of Democracy and the Vulnerability of Democracies. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, V. (2008), The Political Theory of the Compound Republic, 3rd ed.Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Ostrom, V., Tiebout, C., and Warren, R. (1961), ‘The Organization of Government in Metropolitan Areas: A Theoretical Inquiry’, American Political Science Review, 55 (4): 831842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parks, R., Baker, P. C., Kiser, L., Oakerson, R., Ostrom, E., Ostrom, V., Percy, S. L., Vandivort, M. B., Whitaker, G. P., and Wilson, R. (1981), ‘Consumers as Coproducers of Public Services: Some Economic and Institutional Considerations’, Policy Studies Journal, 9 (7): 10011011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parks, R. and Oakerson, R. (1988), ‘Metropolitan Organization: The St. Louis Case’, United States Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations Report M-158. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Reisig, M. (2010), ‘Community and Problem-Oriented Policing’, Crime and Justice, 39 (1): 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reisig, M. and Parks, R. (2004), ‘Can Community Policing Help the Truly Disadvantaged?’, Crime and Delinquency, 50 (2): 139167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robin, G. D. (2000), Community Policing: Origins, Elements, Implementation, Assessment. Lewiston, NY: E. Mellen Press.Google Scholar
Rogers, B. D. and Lipsey, C. M. (1974), ‘Metropolitan Reform: Citizen Evaluations of Performances in Nashville-Davidson County, Tennessee’, Publius, 4 (4): 1934.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, D. P. (1994), The Challenge of Community Policing: Testing the Promises. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenbaum, D. P. and Lurigio, A. J. (1994), ‘An Inside Look at Community Policing Reform: Definitions, Organizational Changes, and Evaluation Findings’, Crime & Delinquency, 40 (3): 299314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell-Einhorn, M., Ward, S., and Seeherman, A. (2000), ‘Federal-Local Law Enforcement Collaboration in Investigating and Prosecuting Urban Crime, 1982–1999: Drugs, Weapons, and Gangs’, National Criminal Justice Reference Service, Report 201782.Google Scholar
Sadd, S. and Grinc, R. (1994), ‘Innovative Neighborhood Oriented Policing: An Evaluation of Community Policing Programs in Eight Cities’, in Rosenbaum, D. P. (ed.), The Challenge of Community Policing: Testing the Promises, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 2752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharp, E. B. (2006), ‘Policing Urban America: A New Look at the Politics of Agency Size’, Social Science Quarterly, 87 (2): 291307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skogan, W. G. (1992), Disorder and Decline: Crime and the Spiral of Decay in American Neighborhoods. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Trojanowicz, R. C., Kappeler, V. E., Gaines, L. K., and Bucqueroux, B. (1998), Community Policing: A Contemporary Perspective. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, G. (1988), ‘Nested Games: The Cohesion of French Electoral Coalitions’, British Journal of Political Science, 18 (2): 145170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Government Accountability Office (2005), ‘Community Policing Grants: COPS Grants Were a Modest Contributor to Declines in Crime in the 1990s’, Report Number GAO-06-104.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D. and Eck, J. (2004), ‘What Can Police Do to Reduce Crime, Disorder, and Fear?’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593: 4265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worrall, J. L. and Kovandzic, T. V. (2007), ‘COPS Grants and Crime Revisited’, Criminology, 45 (1): 159190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, J., Scheider, M. C., and Thurman, Q. (2002), ‘Funding Community Policing to Reduce Crime: Have COPS Grants Made a Difference?’, Criminology and Public Policy, 2 (1): 732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, J. F. (1970), ‘Metropolitan Reform in the U.S.: An Overview’, Public Administration Review, 30 (5): 531543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Re-evaluating community policing in a polycentric system
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Re-evaluating community policing in a polycentric system
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Re-evaluating community policing in a polycentric system
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *