Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-cf9d5c678-r9vz2 Total loading time: 0.691 Render date: 2021-07-31T07:55:11.140Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

What do workers want? Institutional complementarity as a mechanism of social change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 September 2019

Arie Krampf
Affiliation:
Academic College of Tel Aviv Yaffo, Tel Aviv, Israel
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

This article presents a theory of social protection expansion in late-developing open economies based on actors’ perceptions of complementarity. Drawing on recent theories of institutional change and political economic theories of welfare regimes, the article explains why in late-developing open economies, processes of liberalization often result in social welfare expansion. The explanation is based on the existence of institutional complementarity between the production regime and the social welfare regime. The article offers an agent-based theory of change according to which actors – state or market actors – are likely to promote welfare expansion amid their expectations of higher payoffs and/or improved performance of the liberalized economy. This theory challenges the more conventional Power Resource Theory, according to which welfare regimes are shaped primarily by the balance of power between workers and employers. To test the theory, the article analyzes the enactment of the unemployment insurance law in Israel (1972).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Millennium Economics Ltd 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acemoglu, D., and Shimer, R. (2000), ‘Productivity Gains from Unemployment Insurance’, European Economic Review, 44(7): 11951224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al Hamishmar (1966), ‘Mapam: Cooperation through Struggle’, Al Hamismar, 7 December.Google Scholar
Al Hamishmar (1969), ‘Golda Meir Introduced the Government’, Al Hamishmar, 16 December.Google Scholar
Allon, Y. (1962), ‘Summaries and Trends’, Labor and National Insurance 8: 317 (Hebrew).Google Scholar
Allon, Y. (1963), ‘The Operation of the Ministry of Labor, 1963/4’, Labor and National Insurance 3: 8388 (Hebrew).Google Scholar
Amable, B. (2000), ‘Institutional Complementarity and Diversity of Social Systems of Innovation and Production’, Review of International Political Economy, 7(4): 645687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amable, B. (2016), ‘Institutional Complementarities in the Dynamic Comparative Analysis of Capitalism’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 12(1): 79103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aoki, M. (2001), Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis. Comparative Institutional Analysis, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aoki, M. (2007), ‘Endogenizing Institutions and Institutional Changes’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 3(1): 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bar'am, M. (1968), ‘Committee on the Examination of Proposals for Ensuring Employment and Insurance against Unemployment Bill’, Labor and National Insurance 8: 255258 (Hebrew).Google Scholar
Bareli, A. and Cohen, U. (2018), The Academic Middle-Class Rebellion: Socio-Political Conflict over Wage-Gaps in Israel, 1954–1956, Leiden; Boston: BRILL.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkai, H. (1998), The Evolution of Israel's Social security System: Structure, Time Pattern and Macroecomomic Impact. Aldershot, UK; Brookfield, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Bartour, M. (1960), ‘M. Bartour to Levi Eshkol’, 28 August [Letter], Israel State Archive (ISA) ISA-PMO-PrimeMinisterBureau-000u73f.Google Scholar
Bar-Yosef, R. (1970), ‘Report of the Committee on Unemployment Insurance’, Labor and National Insurance, 9: 371378 (Hebrew).Google Scholar
Ben Porat, A. (1999), A History of the Israeli Bourgeoisie, Jerusalem: Magnes Press (Hebrew).Google Scholar
Bergman, A. and Marom, A. (1998), Productivity and Its Causes in the Israeli Industry, 1960–1996. Bank of Israel, Research Department (Hebrew).Google Scholar
Blyth, M. (2003), ‘Same as it Never Was: Temporality and Typology in the Varieties of Capitalism’, Comparative European Politics, 1(2): 215225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyer, R. (2014), ‘Welfare States and Institutional Complementarity: From North to South’, Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.Google Scholar
Chan, H.-S. (2008), ‘The Development of Social Welfare Policy in Taiwan: Welfare Debates between the Left and the Right’ [Manuscript online] http://gpsw.doshisha.ac.jp/pdf/s_080125b.pdf (accessed 1 February 2019)Google Scholar
Crouch, C. (2005), ‘Three Meanings of Complementarity’, Socio-Economic Review, 3(2): 359363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crouch, C. and Farrell, H.. (2004), ‘Breaking the Path of Institutional Development? Alternatives to the New Determinism’, Rationality and Society, 16(1): 543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davar, (1966), ‘Bank of Israel Prefers Unemployment Insurance over Relief Work’, Davar, 23 October.Google Scholar
Deeg, R. and Jackson, G.. (2007), ‘Towards a More Dynamic Theory of Capitalist Variety’, Socio-Economic Review, 5(1): 149179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doron, A. and Kramer, R. M. (1992), The Welfare State in Israel, Jerusalem: Am Oved (Hebrew).Google Scholar
Economic Council Secretariat (1966), Three Year Plan, 1967–1969. 25 August. Labor Movement Archive (LMA), 2-7-1962-245.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Estevez-Abe, M., Iversen, T. and Soskice, D. (2001), ‘Social Protection and the Formation of Skills: A Reinterpretation of the Welfare State’, in Hall, P. A. and Soskice, D. W. (eds), Varieties of Capitalism, pp. 145–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gal, J. (1997), “Unemployment Insurance, Trade-Unions and the Strange Case of the Israeli Labour Movement.International Review of Social History, 42: 357396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gal, J. (2010), “Is There an Extended Family of Mediterranean Welfare States?Journal of European Social Policy, 20(4): 283300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Y. (2011), Pinchas Sapir: An Economic and Political Biography, Tel Aviv: Resling (Hebrew).Google Scholar
Greenwald, C. S. (1972), Recession as a Policy Instrument: Israel 1965–1969, London: C. Hurst.Google Scholar
Gutwein, D. (2017), ‘The Class-Logic of the “Long Revolution”, 1973–77’, Iyunim Bitkumat Yisrael, 11: 2157 (Hebrew).Google Scholar
Hall, P. A. and Gingerich, D. W.. (2004), ‘Varieties of Capitalism and Institutional Complementarities in the Macroeconomy: An Empirical Analysis’, MPIfG Discussion Paper 04/5.Google Scholar
Hall, P. A. and Soskice, D. W. (eds) (2001), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Oxford [England]: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, P. A. and Thelen, K.. (2009), ‘Institutional Change in Varieties of Capitalism’, Socio-Economic Review, 7(1): 734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, C. (2005), ‘Two Can Play at That Game… Or Can They? Varieties of Capitalism, Varieties of Institutionalism’, in Coates, D. (ed.), Varieties of Capitalism, Varieties of Approaches, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 106121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiscox, M. J. (2001), ‘Class versus Industry Cleavages: Inter-Industry Factor Mobility and the Politics of Trade’, International Organization, 55(1): 146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Histadrut (1967), Committee on Unemployment Insurance, 17 April. LMA, IV-104-412-7.Google Scholar
Histadrut (1969), Committee on Unemployment Insurance, 19 February. LMA, IV-104-412-7.Google Scholar
Hoffnung, M. (2006), Protest and Butter: The Influence of the Black Panther Demonstrations on Social Welfare Budgeting, Jerusalem: Nevo (Hebrew).Google Scholar
Howell, C. (2003), ‘Varieties of Capitalism: And Then There Was One?Comparative Politics, 36(1): 103124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, T. (2005), Capitalism, Democracy and Welfare, Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapstein, E. B., and Milanović, B. (2003), Income and Influence: Social Policy in Emerging Market Economies, Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kathleen, T. (2001), ‘Varieties of Labor Politics in the Developed Democracies’, in Hall, P. A. and Soskice, D. W. (eds), Varieties of Capitalism, pp. 71103.Google Scholar
Kleiman, E. (1981), ‘Israel: Economists in a New State’, History of Political Economy, 13(3): 548578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knesset (Different dates), Knesset Minutes [Divrei Ha'knesset], Jerusalem: State of Israel.Google Scholar
Koreh, M. (2015), ‘The Political Economy of Social Insurance: Towards a Fiscal-Centred Framework’, Social Policy & Administration, 27(2): 158172.Google Scholar
Koreh, M. (2017), ‘The Fiscal Politics of Welfare State Expansion: The Case of Social Insurance in Israel’, Journal of European Social Policy, 27(2): 158172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korpi, W. (2006), ‘Power Resources and Employer-Centered Approaches in Explanations of Welfare States and Varieties of Capitalism: Protagonists, Consenters, and Antagonists’, World Politics, 58(2): 167206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krampf, A. (2010), ‘Economic Planning of the Free Market in Israel during the First Decade: The Influence of Don Patinkin on Israeli Policy Discourse’, Science in Context, 23(4): 507534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krampf, A. (2013), ‘Liberalization and Universal Unemployment in Israel’, Social Security, 91: 2957 (Hebrew).Google Scholar
Krampf, A. (2015), The National Origin of the Market Economy: The Development of the Israeli Capitalism. Jerusalem: Magnes University Press (Hebrew).Google Scholar
Krampf, A. (2018), The Israeli Path to Neoliberalism: The State, Continuity and Change (Routledge Studies in Middle Eastern Economies), Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwon, S. and Holliday, I.. (2007), ‘The Korean Welfare State: A Paradox of Expansion in an Era of Globalisation and Economic Crisis’, International Journal of Social Welfare, 16(3): 242248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi-Faur, D. (2001), The Visible Hand: State-Directed Industrialization in Israel. Jerusalem: Yad Ben-Zvi Press (Hebrew).Google Scholar
Lifschiz, D. (1959), ‘D. Lifschiz to the Minister of Foreign Affairs’, 9 July. ISA, ISA-PMO-PrimeMinisterBureau-000u73f.Google Scholar
LMEC (1967), Labor Movement Economic Council Secretariat Session, 10 January, LMA, 2-7-1967-41.Google Scholar
LMEC (1969), Labor Movement Economic Council Session, 11 June, LMA, 2-7-1969-46.Google Scholar
Mandelkern, R. (2016), ‘The New Economic Policy of 1962: How Israeli Economists Almost Changed the Israeli Economy’, Israel Studies Review, 31(2): 4160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mares, I. (2003), The Politics of Social Risk: Business and Welfare State Development, Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, C. J. and Thelen, K. (2007), ‘The State and Coordinated Capitalism: Contributions of the Public Sector to Social Solidarity in Postindustrial Societies’, World Politics, 60(1): 136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MEC (1964a), Ministerial Economic Committee Session, 18 October, ISA.Google Scholar
MEC (1964b), Ministerial Economic Committee Session, 1 November, ISA.Google Scholar
MEC (1964c), Ministerial Economic Committee Session, 22 November, ISA.Google Scholar
Mobility (1967), ‘Labor Mobility: Report of the Committee on Labor Mobility in Israel’, Labor and National Insurance, 5: 147153.Google Scholar
Navon, T. (2016), ‘The Recession: A Milestone in the Political Economic History of Israel, 1964–1967’, Iyunim Bitkumat Yisrael, 26: 429438 (Hebrew).Google Scholar
Nijhuis, D. O. (2009), ‘Revisiting the Role of Labor: Worker Solidarity, Employer Opposition, and the Development of Old-Age Pensions in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom’, World Politics, 61(2): 296329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nölke, A. (2016), ‘Economic Causes of the Eurozone Crisis: The Analytical Contribution of Comparative Capitalism’, Socio-Economic Review, 14(1):141161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pardo, S. (2013), ‘The Year That Israel Considered Joining the European Economic Community’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(5): 901915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Party Bureau (1968), Labor Party Bureau Session, 22 February, LMA, 2-25-1968–21Alef.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (2001), ‘Introduction: Investigating the Welfare State at Century's End’, in Pierson, P. (ed.), The New Politics of the Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polanyi, K. (2001), The Great Transformation, Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Raphael, A. (1969), ‘Plans for Creating an Unemployment Fund’, Ma'ariv, 30 December.Google Scholar
Rodrik, D. (1998), ‘Why Do More Open Economies Have Bigger Governments?Journal of Political Economy, 106(5): 9971032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rom, M. (1964), ‘Custom Unions and GATT’, Economic Quarterly, 11(43): 231242.Google Scholar
Rosenhek, Z. (2002), ‘Social Policy and Nation-Building: The Dynamics of the Israeli Welfare State’, Journal of Societal & Social Policy, 1(1): 1531.Google Scholar
Rothstein, B., Samanni, M., and Teorell, J. (2012), ‘Explaining the Welfare State: Power Resources vs. the Quality of Government’, European Political Science Review, 4(1): 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semyonov, M. and Lewin-Epstein, N. (1987), ‘Non-citizen Arabs in the Israeli Labor Market: Entry and Permeation’, Megamot, 30(4): 402416 (Hebrew).Google Scholar
Shalev, M. (1992), Labour and the Political Economy in Israel (Library of Political Economy), Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shalev, M. (2007), ‘The Welfare State Consensus in Israel: Placing Class Politics in Context’, in Mau, S. and Veghte, B. (eds), The Welfare State, Legitimacy and Social Justice, Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, pp. 193213.Google Scholar
Streeck, W. (2005), ‘Requirements for a Useful Concept of Complementarity’, Socio-Economic Review, 3(2): 363366.Google Scholar
Streeck, W. and Thelen, K. A. (2005), ‘Introduction: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies’, in Streeck, W., and Thelen, K. A. (eds), Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 339.Google Scholar
Summary and Recommendation (1966), ‘Summary and Recommendation of the Committee on Labor Mobility’, no date. ISA, ISA-moital-moital-0003382.Google Scholar
Svirski, S. and Bernstein, D.. (1980), ‘Who Worked in What, for Whom and for What?Notebook for Research and Criticism 4: 566 (Hebrew).Google Scholar
Swenson, P. (2002), Capitalists against Markets: The Making of Labor Markets and Welfare States in the United States and Sweden, Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoseftal, G. (1960), ‘Summaries and Lines of Action: A Speech of Giora Yoseftal in the Parliament’, Labor and National Insurance, 4: 312 (Hebrew).Google Scholar

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

What do workers want? Institutional complementarity as a mechanism of social change
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

What do workers want? Institutional complementarity as a mechanism of social change
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

What do workers want? Institutional complementarity as a mechanism of social change
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *