Skip to main content

Adapting as usual: integrative and segregative institutions shaping adaptation to climate change in local public administrations


Local administrations play a key role in delivering adaptation to climate change. To do so, they need to address collective action. Based on transaction costs economics, this paper explores the role of so-called integrative and segregative institutions in the way local administrations adapt – whether their different functional branches respond to climate change collectively rather than independently. Through a comparative analysis of 19 climate-sensitive local administrations in Germany, the paper shows that variation in the way local administrations structure their internal coordination determines the way they approach climate adaptation. Under integrative institutions, local administrations adjust prior coordination structures to accommodate adaptation. Under segregative institutions, administrations move towards integrative institutions in order to adapt, provided they already ‘feel’ climate change.

Corresponding author
Hide All
Adger, W. N. (2003): Social capital, collective action, and adaptation to climate change. In Economic Geography 79 (4), pp. 387404.
Amundsen, H., Berglund, F. and Westkog, H. (2010): Overcoming barriers to climate change adaptation – a question of multilevel governance? In Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 28 (2), pp. 276–89.
Baldwin, C. Y. (2007): Where do transactions come from? Modularity, transactions, and the boundaries of firms. In Industrial and Corporate Change 17 (1), pp. 155–95.
Birner, R. and Wittmer, H. (2004): On the ‘efficient boundaries of the state’: the contribution of transaction-costs economics to the analysis of decentralization and devolution in natural resource management. In Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 22 (5), pp. 667–85.
Bromley, D. W. (2006): Sufficient Reason: Volitional Pragmatism and the Meaning of Economic Institutions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Buchanan, J. M. and Tullock, G. (1962): The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Coase, R. (1960): The problem of social cost. In Journal of Law and Economics, 3, pp. 144.
Denzau, A. T. and North, D. C. (1994): Shared mental models: ideologies and institutions. In Kyklos 47 (1), pp. 331.
Dodman, D. and Satterthwaite, D. (2008): Institutional capacity, climate change adaptation and the urban poor. In IDS Bulletin 39 (4), pp. 6774.
Few, R., Brown, K. and Tompkins, E. (2011): Public participation and climate change adaptation: avoiding the illusion of inclusion. In Climate Policy 7 (1), 4659.
Gruehn, D., Greiving, S., Rannow, S., Fleischhauer, M., Meyer, B. C., Loibl, W., Züger, J., Köstl, M., Diller, C. and Dosch, F. (2010): Klimawandel als Handlungsfeld der Raumordnung: Ergebnisse der Vorstudie zu den Modelvorhaben ‘Raumentwicklungsstrategien zum Klimawandel’. Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Bau und Stadtentwicklung, Berlin.
Hagedorn, K. (2008): Integrative and Segregative Institutions: a Dichotomy for Nature-related Institutional Analysis. In Schäfer, C., Rupschus, C. and Nagel, U. J. (eds) Proceedings of the Second Green Week Scientific Conference. Marggraf. Weikersheim, pp. 26–38.
Hagedorn, K. (2015): Can the concept of integrative and segregative institutions contribute to the framing of institutions of sustainability? In Sustainability 7 (1), pp. 584611.
Hagedorn, K., Arzt, K. and Peters, U. (2002): Institutional arrangement for environmental co-operatives: a conceptual framework. In Hagedorn, K. (ed.) Environmental Co-operation and Institutional Change. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 325.
Hinkel, J., Bisaro, S., Downing, T. E., Hofmann, M. E., Lonsdale, K., Mcevoy, D. and Tàbara, J. D. (2010): Learning to adapt: re-framing climate change adaptation. In Holme, M. and Neufeldt, H. (eds) Making Climate Change Work for Us: European Perspectives on Adaptation and Mitigation Strategies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 113–34.
Keskitalo, E. C. H. and Kulyasova, A. A. (2009): The role of governance in community adaptation to climate change. In Polar Research 28 (1), pp. 6070.
Langlois, R. N. (2002): Modularity in technology and organization. In Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 49 (1), pp. 1937.
Langlois, R. N. (2006): The secret life of mundane transaction costs. In Organization Studies 27 (9), pp. 1389–410.
Marshall, G. R. (2013): Transaction costs, collective action and adaptation in managing complex social–ecological systems. In Ecological Economics 88, pp. 185–94.
McCann, L. (2013): Transaction costs and environmental policy design. In Ecological Economics 88, pp. 253–62.
McCann, L., Colby, B., Easter, K. W., Kasterine, A. and Kuperan, K. V. (2005): Transaction cost measurement for evaluating environmental policies. In Ecological Economics 52 (4) (1 March), pp. 527–42.
Næss, L. O., Bang, G., Eriksen, S. and Vevatne, J. (2005): Institutional adaptation to climate change: flood responses at the municipal level in Norway. In Global Environmental Change 15 (2), 125–38.
Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009): A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. In Global Environmental Change 19 (3), pp. 354–65.
Quaranta, M. and Schneider, C. Q. (2013): How to . . . use software for set-theoretic analysis: online appendix to C. Q. Schneider and C. Wagemann (2012): Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences – A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Ragin, C. C. (2006): Set relations in social research: evaluating their consistency and coverage. In Political Analysis 14 (3), pp. 291310.
Roggero, M. (2015): Adapting institutions: exploring climate adaptation through institutional economics and set relations. In Ecological Economics 118, pp. 114–22.
Roggero, M. and Fritsch, O. (2010): Mind the costs: rescaling and multi-level environmental governance in Venice Lagoon. In Environmental Management 46 (1), pp. 1728.
Schneider, C. Q. and Wagemann, C. (2012): Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences – A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Simon, H. A. (1962): The architecture of complexity. In Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 106 (6), pp. 467–82.
Thiel, A., Schleyer, C. and Plieninger, T. (2012): Wolves are mobile, while fruit trees are not! How characteristics of resources and supranational regulatory frameworks shape the provision of biodiversity and ecosystem services in Germany. In Environmental Policy and Governance 22 (3), pp. 189204.
Thiel, A., Schleyer, C., Hinkel, J., Schlüter, M., Hagedorn, K., Bisaro, A., Bobojonov, I. and Hamidov, A. (2016): Transferring Williamson's discriminating alignment to the analysis of environmental governance of social-ecological interdependence. In Ecological Economics 128, pp. 159–68.
Vatn, A. (2005): Institutions and the Environment. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Williamson, O. E. (1985): The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. New York: Free Press.
Williamson, O. E. (1998): Transaction cost economics: how it works and where it is headed. In De Economist 146 (1), pp. 2358.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Institutional Economics
  • ISSN: 1744-1374
  • EISSN: 1744-1382
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-institutional-economics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Roggero and Thiel supplementary material
Roggero and Thiel supplementary material 1

 PDF (212 KB)
212 KB


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed