Skip to main content Accesibility Help

Artifacts at the centre of routines: performing the material turn in routines theory


Existing theories of organizational routines have generally had simplistic and extreme views of artifacts as fully deterministic or largely inconsequential. Artifacts have been treated as either too solid to be avoided, or too flexible to have an effect. This paper endeavours to improve our understanding of the influence of artifacts on routines dynamics by proposing a novel and deeper conceptualization of their mutual relationship. In drawing from recent advances in Routines and STS/Performativity Theory, the paper contributes to advancing our understanding of routines dynamics by bringing artifacts and materiality from the periphery to the very centre of routines and Routines Theory.

Corresponding author
Hide All
Adler, P. S. and Obstfeld, D. (2007), ‘The Role of Affect in Creative Projects and Exploratory Search’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 16: 1950.
Akrich, M. (1992), ‘The De-scription of Technical Objects’, in Bijker, W. E. and Law, J. (eds.), Shaping Technology/Building Society – Studies in Sociotechnical Change, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Arthur, W. B. (1994), ‘Inductive Reasoning and Bounded Rationality’, The American Economic Review, 84 (2): 406411.
Bakken, T. and Hernes, T. (2006), ‘Organizing is Both a Verb and Noun: Weick Meets Whitehead’, Organisation Studies, 27 (11): 15991616.
Barley, S. (1986), ‘Technology as an Occasion for Structuring: Evidence from Observation of CT Scanners and the Social Order of Radiology Departments’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 31: 78108.
Barnes, B. (1982), T.S. Kuhn and Social Science, London: Macmillan.
Becker, M. C., Lazaric, N., Nelson, R. R., and Winter, S. G. (2005), ‘Applying Organizational Routines in Understanding Organizational Change’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 14 (5): 775791.
Bechky, B. A. (2003), ‘Sharing Meaning Across Occupational Communities: The Transformation of Understanding on a Production Floor’, Organization Science, 14 (3): 312330.
Beunza, D. and Stark, D. (2004), ‘Tools of the Trade: The Sociotechnology of Arbitrage in a Wall Street Trading Room’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 13 (2): 369400.
Bloor, D. (1997), Wittgenstein, Rules and Institutions, London: Routledge.
Bourdieu, P. (1977), Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (2005), The Social Structures of the Economy, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bowker, G. C. and Star, S. L. (1999), Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Brey, P. (2005), ‘Artefacts as Social Agents’, in Harbers, H. (ed.), Inside the Politics of Technology: Agency and Normativity in the Co-Production of Technology and Society, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 6184.
Callon, M. (1987), ‘Society in the Making: The Study of Technology as a Tool for Sociological Analysis’, in Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., and Pinch, T. (eds.), The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 83103.
Callon, M. (1998), ‘An Essay on Framing and Overflowing: Economic Externalities Revisited by Sociology’, in Callon, M. (ed.), The Laws of the Markets, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 244269.
Callon, M. (2007), ‘What Does It Mean to Say that Economics Is Performative?’, in MacKenzie, D., Muniesa, F., and Siu, L. (eds.), Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Callon, M. and Caliskan, C. (2010), ‘Economization, Part 2: A Research Programme 1172 on the Study of Marketization’, Economy and Society, 39 (1): 132.
Callon, M. and Muniesa, F. (2005), ‘Economic Markets as Calculative Collective Devices’, Organisation Studies, 26: 11291250.
Carlile, P. (2004), ‘Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries’, Organization Science, 15 (5): 555568.
Carlile, P. R. (2002), ‘A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development’, Organization Science, 13 (4): 442455.
Cohen, M. (2007), ‘Reading Dewey: Reflections on the Study of Routine’, Organisation Studies, 28: 773786.
Cohen, M. D., Burkhart, R., Dosi, G., Egidi, M., Marengo, L., Warglien, M., and Winter, S. G. (1996), ‘Routines and Other Recurring Patterns of Organisations: Contemporary Research Issues’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 5: 653698.
D'Adderio, L. (2001), ‘Crafting the Virtual Prototype: How Firms Integrate Knowledge and Capabilities Across Organizational Boundaries’, Research Policy, 30: 14091424.
D'Adderio, L. (2003), ‘Configuring Software, Reconfiguring Memories: The Influence of Integrated Systems on the Reproduction of Knowledge and Routines’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 12 (2): 321350.
D'Adderio, L. (2008a), ‘The Performativity of Routines: Theorising the Influence of Artefacts and Distributed Agencies on Routines Dynamics’, Research Policy, 37 (5): 769789.
D'Adderio, L. (2008b), ‘The Dependable Transfer of Routines and Capabilities: A Performative View’, Academy of Management (AOM) Meeting, Paper No. 15238, Anaheim, CA.
Dewey, J. (1922), Human Nature and Conduct: An Introduction to Social Psychology, New York: H. Holt & Company.
Dougherty, D. (1992), ‘Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms’, Organization Science, 3 (2): 179202.
Feldman, M. S. (2000), ‘Organizational Routines as a Source of Continuous Change’, Organization Science, 11 (6): 611629.
Feldman, M. S. (2003), ‘A Performative Perspective on Stability and Change in Organizational Routines’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 12 (4): 727752.
Feldman, M. S. and Pentland, B. T. (2003), ‘Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 48: 94118.
Ferraro, F., Pfeffer, J., and Sutton, R. I. (2005), ‘Economics Language and Assumptions: How Theories Can Become Self-Fulfilling’, Academy of Management Review, 30 (1): 824.
Galison, P. (1999), ‘Trading Zone: Coordinating Action and Belief’, in Biagioli, M. (ed.), The Science Studies Reader, New York: Routledge, pp. 137160.
Garfinkel, H. (1967), Studies in Ethnomethodology, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Geertz, C. (1966), ‘Religion as a Cultural System’, in Banton, M. (ed.), Anthropological Approaches to the Study of Religion, London: Tavistock Publications, pp. 146.
Gibson, J. J. (1979), The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Giddens, A. (1993), New Rules of Sociological Method, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Grint, K. and Woolgar, S. (1992), ‘Computers, Guns, and Roses: What's Social about Being Shot?’, Science, Technology and Human Values, 17 (3): 366380.
Hatherly, D., Leung, D., and MacKenzie, D. (2007), ‘The Finitist Accountant’, The University of Edinburgh, April 2007.
Holm, P. (2007), ‘Which Way is Up on Callon?’, in MacKenzie, D., Muniesa, F., and Siu, L. (eds.), Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics, Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Hutchins, E. (1991), ‘Organizing Work by Adaptation’, Organization Science, 2 (1): 1439.
Hutchins, E. (1995), Cognition in the Wild, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hutchins, E. and Hazelhurst, B. (1991), ‘Learning in the Cultural Process’, in Langton, C. et al. (eds.), Artificial Life II: Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Knorr Cetina, K. (2005), ‘How Are Global Markets Global? The Architecture of a Flow World’, in Knorr Cetina, K. and Preda, A. (eds.), The Sociology of Financial Markets, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3861.
Latour, B. (1986), ‘Visualization and Cognition: Thinking with Eyes and Hands’, Knowledge and Society: Studies in the Sociology of Culture Past and Present, 6: 140.
Latour, B. (1987), Science in Action, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (1992), ‘Where Are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artefacts’, in Bijker, W. E. and Law, J. (eds.), Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 225258.
Latour, B. (2005), Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor Network Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lave, J. (1988), Cognition in Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991), Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lazaric, N. and Denis, B. (2001), ‘How and Why Routines Change: Some Lessons from the Articulation of Knowledge with ISO 9002’, Economies et Societes, 6 (4): 585611.
Lynch, M. (1992), ‘Extending Wittgenstein: The Pivotal Move from Epistemology to the Sociology of Science’, in Pickering, A. (ed.), Science as Practice and Culture, Chicago: Chicago University Press, pp. 215265.
Leonardi, P. M. and Barley, S. R. (2008), ‘Materiality and Change: Challenges to Building Better Theory about Technology and Organizing’, Information and Organization, 18 (3):159176.
MacKenzie, D. (2003), ‘An Equation and Its Worlds: Bricolage, Exemplars, Disunity and Performativity in Financial Economics’, Social Studies of Science, 33 (6): 831868.
MacKenzie, D. (2005), ‘Is Economics Performative? Option Theory and the Construction of Derivatives Markets’, Presented to the annual meeting of the History of Economics Society, Tacoma, WA, 25 June 2005.
MacKenzie, D. (2006), An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial Models Shape Markets, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
MacKenzie, D. (2009), Material Markets: How economic Agents Are Constructed, New York: Oxford University Press.
March, J. and Simon, H. (1958), Organizations, New York, NY: Wiley.
Mol, A. (2002), The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice, Science and Cultural Theory, Durham: Duke University Press.
Mumford, L. (1964), ‘Authoritarian and Democratic Technics’, Technology and Culture, 5 (1):18
Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
Norman, D. A. (1993), Things that Make Us Smart: Defending Human Attributes in the Age of the Machine, Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
Orlikowski, W. J. (1992), ‘The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations’, Organization Science, 3 (3): 398427.
Orlikowski, W. J. (2000), ‘Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations’, Organization Science, 11 (4): 404428.
Orlikowski, W. J. (2002), ‘Knowing in Practice: Enacting a Collective Capability in Distributed Organizing’, Organization Science, 13 (3): 249273.
Orlikowski, W. J. (2010), ‘The Sociomateriality of Organizational Life: Considering Technology in Management Research’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34: 125141.
Orlikowski, W. and Iacono, C. (2001), ‘Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the “IT” in IT Research – A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact’, Information Systems Research, 12 (2): 121134.
Oxford English Dictionary Online (3rd edn):
Pentland, B. T. and Feldman, M. S. (2005), ‘Organizational Routines as a Unit of Analysis’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 14 (5): 793815.
Pentland, B. T. and Feldman, M. S. (2008), ‘Designing Routines: On the Folly of Designing Artifacts, while Hoping for Patterns of Action’, Information and Organization, 18 (4): 235250.
Pentland, B. T. and Reuter, H. H. (1994), ‘Organizational Routines as Grammars of Action’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 484510.
Pfaffenberger, B. (1992), ‘Technological Dramas’, Science, Technology and Human Values, 17: 282312.
Pickering, A. (1994), After Representation: Science Studies in the Performative Idiom, Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the PSA (2): 413–419.
Pinch, T. and Bijker, W. J. (1987), ‘The Social Construction of Facts and Artifacts, or How the Sociology of Science and Technology Might Aid Each Other’, in Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., and Pinch, T. (eds.), The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 1749.
Pollock, N. and Cornford, J. (2004), ‘ERP Systems and the University as a “Unique” Organization’, Information Technology and People, 17 (1): 3152.
Preda, A. (2000), ‘Order with Things? Humans, Artifacts, and the Sociological Problem of Rule-Following’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 30: 269298.
Preda, A. (2004), ‘Informative Prices, Rational Investors: The Emergence of the Random Walk Hypothesis and the Nineteenth-Century “Science of Financial Investments”’, History of Political Economy, 36 (2): 351386.
Preda, A. (2007), ‘Where Do Analysts Come From? The Case of Financial Chartism’, in Callon, M., Millo, Y., and Muniesa, F. (eds.), Market Devices, Oxford: Blackwell.
Rafaeli, A. and Pratt, M. G. (2006), ‘Understanding our objective reality’, in Rafaeli, A. and Pratt, M. G. (eds.), Artifacts and Organizations: Beyond Mere Symbolism, Series in Organization and Management, Mahwah, NJ: Routledge.
Schatzki, T. R., Cetina, K. Knorr, and von Savigny, E. (eds.) (2001), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, London: Routledge.
Schultz, M. (2008), ‘Staying on Track: A Voyage to the Internal Mechanisms of Routine Reproduction’, in Becker, M. C. (ed.), Handbook of Organizational Routines, Northampton: Edward Elgar, pp. 228255.
Simon, H. A. (1969), The Sciences of the Artificial, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Suchman, L. A. (1983), ‘Office Procedure as Practical Action: Models of Work and System Design’, ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 1 (4): 320328.
Suchman, L. A. (1987), Plans and Situated Action: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Szulanski, G. (1996), ‘Exploring Internal Stickiness: Impediments to the Transfer of Best Practice within the Firm’, Strategic Management Journal, 17: 2743.
Taylor, C. (1993), ‘To Follow A Rule’, in Schatzki, T. R., Cetina, K. Knorr, and von, E. Savigny (eds.), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, London: Routledge.
Thomas, N. (1991), Entangled Objects, Exchange, Material Culture and Colonialism in the Pacific, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vilnai-Yavetz, I. and Rafaeli, A. (2006), ‘Managing Artifacts to Avoid Artifact Miopia’, in Rafaeli, A. and Pratt, M. G. (eds.), Artifacts and Organizations: Beyond Mere Symbolism, series in Organization and Management, Mahwah, NJ: Routledge.
Winter, S. G. (1995), ‘Four Rs of Profitability: Rents, Resources, Routines, and Replication’, in Montgomery, C. (ed.), Resource-based and Evolutionary Theories of the Firm – Towards a Synthesis, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 147178.
Winner, L. (1980), ‘Do Artifacts Have Politics?’, Daedalus, 109 (1): 121136.
Winter, S. G. and Szulanski, G. (2001), ‘Replication as Strategy’, Organization Science, 12 (6): 730743.
Wittgenstein, L. (1967), Philosophical Investigations, Oxford: Blackwell.
Zbarachi, M. J. and Bergen, M. (forthcoming), ‘When Truces Collapse: A Longitudinal Study of Price Adjustment Routines’, Organization Science.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Institutional Economics
  • ISSN: 1744-1374
  • EISSN: 1744-1382
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-institutional-economics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed