Skip to main content

Bottom-up or top-down? The origins of the Industrial Revolution

  • JOEL MOKYR (a1) (a2)

Was technological progress during and after the Industrial Revolution top-down or bottom-up? The technology that created the great inventions was driven by a combination of pathbreaking ideas and the dexterity and skills of trained artisans. While those forms of human capital were quite different, they both came out of small elites of intellectuals and craftsmen, what are rapidly becoming known as “upper-tail human capital.” I analyze the institutions that drove the incentives for both, and show that they came together to produce the Great Enrichment. These incentives were both material and social: between 1500 and 1700, the search for financial security and reputation cooperated in producing a unique institutional environment in which the elites in Western Europe produced the three legged-stool of European modernity: the Reformation, the Scientific Revolution, and the Enlightenment. Once these three movements had succeeded, the foundation for modern economic growth had been laid.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Bottom-up or top-down? The origins of the Industrial Revolution
      Available formats
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Bottom-up or top-down? The origins of the Industrial Revolution
      Available formats
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Bottom-up or top-down? The origins of the Industrial Revolution
      Available formats
Corresponding author
Hide All
Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J. (2006) “De Facto Political Power and Institutional Persistence,” American Economic Review 96 (2), pp. 325–30.
Allen, R. C. (2009) The British Industrial Revolution in Global Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Aquinas, T. (1947) The Summa Theologica (Benziger Bros edition). Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province. Available at (accessed July 20, 2017).
Bacon, F. ([1620]1999) The Great Instauration. Reprinted in Selected Philosophical Works, edited by Rose-Mary Sargent. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.
Beckert, S. (2014) Empire of Cotton: a Global History. New York: Vintage Books.
Berg, M. (2007) “The Genesis of Useful Knowledge,” History of Science 45/2 (148), 123–34.
Besley, T. and Ghatak, M. (2008) “Status Incentives,” American Economic Review 98 (2), 206–11.
Clark, G. (2007) A Farewell to Alms. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Coleman, D. C. and MacLeod, C. (1986) “Attitudes to New Techniques: British Businessmen, 1800–1950,” Economic History Review (New Series) 39 (4), 588611.
Dasgupta, P. and David, P. A. (1994) “Toward a New Economics of Science,” Research Policy, 23 (5), 487521.
Daston, L. (1995) “Curiosity in Early Modern Science,” Word and Image 11 (4), 391404.
Daston, L. (2005) “All Curls and Pearls: a review of Neil Kenny, ‘The Uses of Curiosity in Early Modern France and Germany.’” London Review of Books, June 23, pp. 37–8.
Daston, L and Park, K. (1998) Wonders and the Order of Nature, 1150–1750. New York: Zone Books.
David, P. A. (2008) “The Historical Origins of ‘Open Science’: An Essay on Patronage, Reputation and Common Agency Contracting in the Scientific Revolution,” Capitalism and Society 3 (2), 1103.
De la Croix, D. and Licandro, O. (2015) “The Longevity of Famous People from Hammurabi to Einstein,” Journal of Economic Growth 20 (3), 263303.
Descartes, R. ([1641]2005) Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy. Translated by Elizabeth Haldane. Stilwell, KS: Digireads.
Dobbs, B. J. T. (2002) The Janus Faces of Genius: The Role of Alchemy in Newton's Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eamon, W. (1994) Science and the Secrets of Nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Epstein, S. R. (2008). “Craft Guilds, the Theory of the Firm, and the European Economy, 1400–1800.” In Epstein, S. R. and Prak, M. (eds), Guilds, Innovation and the European Economy, 1400–1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 5280.
Evans, R. J. W. (1973) Rudolf II and His World. Oxford: Oxford University Press (1997 edition).
Fara, P. (2002) Newton: The Making of a Genius. New York: Columbia University Press.
Feingold, M. (1984) The Mathematician's Apprenticeship: Science, Universities and Society in England 1560–640. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Frede, D. (2013) “Alexander of Aphrodisias,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta. Available at (accessed July 20, 2017).
Frey, B. and Gallus, J. (2015) “Towards an Economics of Awards,” Journal of Economic Surveys. DOI: 10.1111/joes.12127.
Greif, A. (2005) Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy: Lessons from Medieval Trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Greif, A. and Mokyr, J. (2016) “Institutions and Economic History: A Critique of Professor McCloskey,” Journal of Institutional Economics 12 (1), 2941.
Hobbes, T. ([1651]1929) Leviathan. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Houghton, W. E. Jr. (1942) “The English Virtuoso in the Seventeenth Century, pts. I and II,” Journal of the History of Ideas 3 (1), 51–73, 190217.
Huff, T. (2011) Intellectual Curiosity and the Scientific Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hughes, J. R. T. (1986) The Vital Few: the Entrepreneur and American Progress. Expanded Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hume, D. ([1742]1985) “Of the Rise and Progress of the Arts and Sciences.” In Hume, D., Essays: Moral, Political and Literary, edited by Miller, E. F.. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, pp. 111–37.
Hunter, M. (1989) Establishing the New Science: the Experience of the Early Royal Society. Woodbridge, UK: Boydell Press.
Hunter, M. (2009) Boyle: Between God and Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Jacob, M. C. (1997) Scientific Culture and the Making of the Industrial West (2nd edn), New York: Oxford University Press.
Jones, E. L. (1981) The European Miracle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kelly, M. and Ó Gráda, C. (2017) “Adam Smith, Watch Prices, and the Industrial Revolution,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, forthcoming.
Kreps, D. M. (1997) “Intrinsic Motivation and Extrinsic Incentives,” American Economic Review 87 (2), pp. 359–64.
Labrousse, E. (1983) Bayle, translated by Dennis Potts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lowengard, S. (2006) The Creation of Color in Eighteenth-Century Europe. New York: Gutenberg-ebooks. Available at, accessed October 4, 2010.
MacLeod, C. (2007) Heroes of Invention: Technology, Liberalism and British Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McCloskey, D. N. (2010) Bourgeois Dignity: Why Economics Can't Explain the Modern World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McCormmach, R. (2008) “Cavendish, Henry.” In Gillispie, C. C., ed., Complete Dictionary of Scientific Biography (vol. 3). Detroit: Charles Scribner's Sons, pp. 155–9.
Meisenzahl, R. R. and Mokyr, J. (2012) “The Rate and Direction of Invention in the British Industrial Revolution: Incentives and Institutions.” In Stern, S. and Lerner, J. (eds), The Rate and Direction of Innovation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 443–79.
Mokyr, J. (2005) “Long-term Economic Growth and the History of Technology.” In Aghion, P. and Durlauf, S. (eds), Handbook of Economic Growth. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 1113–80.
Mokyr, J. (2007) “Knowledge, Enlightenment, and the Industrial Revolution: Reflections on Gifts of Athena”. History of Science 45 (148) 185–96.
Mokyr, J. (2009) The Enlightened Economy. New York and London: Yale University Press.
Mokyr, J. (2017) “The Market for Ideas and the Great Enrichment.” Unpublished manuscript, presented at the Hoover Institution conference on “Restoring Prosperity,” February.
Musson, A. E. and Robinson, E. (1969) Science and Technology in the Industrial Revolution. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Ostrom, E. and Hess, C. (2007) “A Framework for Analyzing the Knowledge Commons.” In Hess, C. and Ostrom, E. (eds), Understanding Knowledge as a Commons. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 4181.
Pacey, A. (1975) The Maze of Ingenuity: Ideas and idealism in the Development of Technology. New York: Holmes and Meier.
Reynolds, T. S (1983) Stronger Than a Hundred Men: A History of the Vertical Water Wheel. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Sen, A. (2010) “The Economist Manifesto,” New Statesman, April 23.
Shank, J. B. (2008) The Newton Wars and the Beginnings of the French Enlightenment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Shapin, S. (1994) A Social History of Truth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Smith, A. ([1759]1976) The Theory of Moral Sentiments, edited by Raphael, D. D. and Macfie, A. L.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Smith, A. ([1762–3] 1978) Lectures on Jurisprudence, edited by Meek, R. L.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Squicciarini, M. and Voigtländer, N. (2015) Human Capital and Industrialization: Evidence from the Age of Enlightenment, Quarterly Journal of Economics 130 (4), 1825–83.
Tomory, L. (2012) Progressive Enlightenment: The Origins of the Gaslight Industry, 1780–1820. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Westfall, R. S. (1985) “Science and Patronage: Galileo and the Telescope,” Isis 76 (1) 1130.
Wootton, D. (2015) The Invention of Science: A New History of the Scientific Revolution. London: Allen Lane.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Institutional Economics
  • ISSN: 1744-1374
  • EISSN: 1744-1382
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-institutional-economics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed