Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Determinants of in-court settlements: empirical evidence from a German trial court

  • MICHAEL BERLEMANN (a1) and ROBIN CHRISTMANN (a2)

Abstract

Because verdicts are typically the more costly resolution of legal disputes, most governments are interested in high settlement rates. In this paper, we use a unique dataset of 860 case records from a German trial court to explore which institutional factors have a significant impact on the decision to settle in civil law litigation. We find that procedural aspects and individual characteristics of the involved judge have a significant impact on in-court settlement probability. We also find that judge-specific aspects such as the judge's gender may have an impact on settlement probabilities in certain subfields of law. Based on our empirical results, we derive some conclusions for legal policies that aim at increasing settlement rates.

Copyright

Corresponding author

References

Hide All
Ai, C., and Norton, E. (2003), “Interaction Terms in Logit and Probit Models,” Economics Letters 80: 123–9.
Bartus, T. (2005), “Estimation of Marginal Effects Using Margeff,” Stata Journal 5 (3): 309–29.
Berlemann, M., and Christmann, R. (2016), “Do judges react to the probability of appellate review? Empirical evidence from court procedures,” Applied Economics Letters 23: 202–5.
Bielen, S., Marneffe, W., and Veereck, L. (2015), “An Empirical Analysis of Case Disposition Time in Belgium,” Review of Law and Economics 11 (2): 293316.
Bielen, S., Grajzl, P., and Marneffe, W. (2016), “Understanding the Time to Court Case Resolution: A Competing Risk Analysis Using Belgian Data,” unpublished manuscript, Faculty of Business Economics, Hasselt University.
Boyd, C., and Hoffman, D. (2012), “Litigating toward Settlement,” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 29 (4): 898929.
Bundestag (2000), Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Reform des Zivilprozesses, Drucksache 14/4722, Berlin: Bundestag.
Christensen, R., and Szmer, J. (2012), “Examining the efficiency of the US courts of appeals: Pathologies and Prescriptions,” International Review of Law and Economics 32 (1): 30–7.
Cremers, K., and Schliessler, P. (2015), “Patent Litigation Settlement in Germany: Why Parties Settle During Trial,” European Journal of Law and Economics 40 (2): 185208.
Croson, R., and Gneezy, U. (2009), “Gender Differences in Preferences,” Journal of Economic Literature 47 (2): 127.
Eisenberg, T. (1990), “Testing the Selection Effect: A New Theoretical Framework with Empirical Tests,” Journal of Legal Studies 19 (2): 337–58.
Eisenberg, T., and Lanvers, C. (2009), ‘What is the Settlement Rate and Why Should We Care?” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 6 (1): 111–46.
Fenn, P., and Rickmann, N. (2001), “Asymmetric Information and the Settlement of Insurance Claims,” Journal of Risk and Insurance 68 (4): 615–30.
Fon, V., and Parisi, F. (2006), “Judicial Precedents in Civil Law Systems: A Dynamic Analysis,” International Review of Law and Economics 26 (4): 519–35.
Gould, J. (1973), “The Economics of Legal Conflict,” Journal of Legal Studies 108 (1–2): 279300.
Grajzl, P., and Zajc, K. (2016), “Litigation and the Timing of Settlement: Evidence from Commercial Disputes,” European Journal of Law and Economics (forthcoming).
Hilbe, J. (2009), Logistic Regression Models, Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Huber, M. (2009), “Grundwissen– Zivilprozessrecht: Früher erster Termin oder schriftliches Vorverfahren,” Juristische Schulung 8 (9): 683–4.
Jackson, R. (2010), Review of Civil Litigation Costs: Final Report, Norwich: Blackwell.
Kulik, C., Perry, E., and Pepper, M. (2003), “Here Comes the Judge: The Influence of Judge Personal Characteristics on Federal Sexual Harassment Case Outcomes,” Law and Human Behavior 27 (1): 6986.
Landes, W. (1971), “An Economic Analysis of the Courts,” Journal of Law and Economics 14 (1): 61107.
Ledermann, L. (1999), “Which Cases Go to Trial?: An Empirical Study of Predictors of Failure to Settle,” Case Western Reserve Law Review 49 (2): 315–58.
Lurie, P. (2013), “Guided choice: early mediated settlements and/or customized arbritrations,” Journal of the American College of Construction Lawyers 7 (2): 167–75.
Mailath, G., and Samuelson, L. (2006), Repeated Games and Reputations, New York: Oxford University Press.
McBride, M., and Skaperdas, S. (2014), “Conflict, Settlement, and the Shadow of the Future,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 105: 7589.
Posner, R. (1973), “An Economic Approach to Legal Procedure and Judicial Administration,” Journal of Legal Studies 2 (2): 399458.
Priest, G. (1985), “Reexamining the Selection Hypothesis: Learning from Wittman's Mistakes,” Journal of Legal Studies 14: 215–43.
Priest, G., and Klein, B. (1984), “The Selection of Disputes for Litigation,” Journal of Legal Studies 13: 155.
Ramseyer, M. (2012), “Talent Matters: Judicial Productivity and Speed in Japan,” International Review of Law and Economics 32: 3848.
Schneider, M. (2005), “Judicial Career Incentives and Court Performance: An Empirical Study of the German Labour Courts of Appeal,” European Journal of Law and Economics 20: 127–44.
Shavell, S. (1982), “The Social Versus the Private Incentive to Bring Suit in a Costly Legal System,” Journal of Legal Studies 11: 333–9.
Shavell, S. (1995), “Alternative Dispute Resolution: An Economic Analysis,” Journal of Legal Studies 24 (1): 128.
Spier, K. (1992), “The Dynamics of Pretrial Negotiations,” Review of Economic Studies 59: 93108.
Spier, K. (2007), “Litigation,” in Shavell, S. & Polinsky, A. (eds), Handbook of Law and Economics, 259342, New York: North Holland.
Spier, K., and Hay, B. (1998), “Litigation and Settlement,” in Newmann, P. (ed.), New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law, 442, London: Macmillan.
Statistisches Bundesamt (2009), “Rechtspflege: Zivilgerichte. Korrigierte Ergebnisse,” Fachserie 10, Reihe 2.1, Wiesbaden: Bundesdruckerei.
Statistisches Bundesamt (2016), “Justiz- & Rechtspflege: Gerichtsverfahren,” https://www.destatis.de/DE/ZahlenFakten/GesellschaftStaat/Rechtspflege/Tabellen/Gerichtsverfahren.html;jsessionid=0F5B91AE654AC1C5104FD6A9A395DA75.cae1 (downloaded January 31, 2017).
US Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure (1982), “Judicial Conference of the United States,” final draft, Washington, DC.
Wittman, D. (1985), “Is the Selection of Cases for Trial Biased?Journal of Legal Studies 14: 185214.
Yildiz, M. (2011), “Bargaining with optimism,” Annual Review of Economics 3: 451–78.

Determinants of in-court settlements: empirical evidence from a German trial court

  • MICHAEL BERLEMANN (a1) and ROBIN CHRISTMANN (a2)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed