Skip to main content

Laws, norms, and the Institutional Analysis and Development framework

  • DANIEL H. COLE (a1)

Elinor Ostrom's Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework has been described as ‘one of the most developed and sophisticated attempts to use institutional and stakeholder assessment in order to link theory and practice, analysis and policy’. But not all elements in the framework are sufficiently well developed. This paper focuses on one such element: the ‘rules-in-use’ (a.k.a. ‘rules’ or ‘working rules’). Specifically, it begins a long-overdue conversation about relations between formal legal rules and ‘working rules’ by offering a tentative and very simple typology of relations. Type 1: Some formal legal rules equal or approximate the working rules; Type 2: Some legal rules plus (or emended by) widely held social norms equal or approximate the working rules; and Type 3: Some legal rules bear no evident relation to the working rules. Several examples, including some previously used by Ostrom, are provided to illustrate each of the three types, which can be conceived of as nodes or ranges along a continuum. The paper concludes with a call for empirical research, especially case studies and meta-analyses, to determine the relevant scope of each of these types of relations, and to provide data for furthering our understanding of how different types of rules, from various sources, function (or not) as institutions.

Corresponding author
Hide All
Ackerman B. (2014), We the People: Volume 3: The Civil Rights Revolution, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
Aligica P. D. (2006), ‘Institutional and stakeholder mapping: frameworks for policy analysis and institutional change’, Public Organization Review 6: 7990.
Aristotle (1941), ‘Nicomachean ethics’, in The Basic Works of Aristotle, translated by R. McKeon, New York: Random House, pp. 9271112.
Berkes F. (1986), ‘Local-level management and the commons problem’, Marine Policy 10 (3): 215–29.
Bodo L. D. (2011), ‘Somewhere between Jim Crow and post‐racialism: reflections on the racial divide in America today’, Daedalus 140: 1136.
Bohannan P. (1965), ‘The differing realms of the law’, American Anthropologist 67 (6): 3342.
Brennan G., Eriksson L., Goodin R. E. and Southwood N.. 2013. Explaining Norms, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cole D. H. and Grossman P. Z. (2011), Principles of Law and Economics, 2nd edition, New York: Wolters Kluwer.
Commons J. R. (1959), Legal Foundations of Capitalism, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Crawford S. E. S. and Ostrom E. (1995), ‘A grammar of institutions’, American Political Science Review 89 (3): 582600.
Ehrlich E. ([1936]2009), Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Ellickson R. C. (1991), Order without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Elmes F. (1966), ‘Government and people: III: when is a law not a law?Police Journal 39: 4754.
Griffiths J. (1986), ‘What is legal pluralism?Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 32: 155.
Hart H. L. A. (1961), The Concept of Law, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Kingston C. and Caballero G. (2009), ‘Comparing theories of institutional change’, Journal of Institutional Economics 5 (2): 151–80.
Kiser L. L. and Ostrom E.. (1982), ‘The three worlds of action: a metatheoretical synthesis of institutional approaches’, in Ostrom E. (ed.), Strategies of political inquiry, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, pp. 179222.
Leach S. and Lowndes V. (2007), ‘Of roles and rules: analyzing the changing relationship between political leaders and chief executives in local government’, Public Policy & Administration 22 (2): 183200.
Lowndes V. and Leach S. (2004), Understanding Local Political Leadership: Constitutions, Contexts and Capabilities’, Local Government Studies 30 (4): 557–75.
McGinnis M. D. (2011a), ‘An Introduction to the IAD and the Language of the Ostrom Workshop: A Simple Guide to a Complex Framework’, Policy Studies Journal 39 (1): 169–83.
McGinnis M. D. (2011b), ‘Networks of Adjacent Action Situations in Polycentric Governance’, Policy Studies Journal 39 (1): 5178.
Menell S. J. (1969), ‘Prohibition: A Sociological View’, Journal of American Studies 3 (2): 159–75.
Miron J. A. and Zwiebel J. (1991), ‘Alcohol Consumption during Prohibition’, American Economic Review 81 (2): 242–7.
North D. C. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ostrom E. (1965). ‘Public Entrepreneurship: A Case Study in Ground Water Basin Management’, Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA,
Ostrom E. (1986), ‘Multiorganizational Arrangements and Coordination: An Application of Institutional Analysis’, in Kaufmann F. X., Majone G. and Ostrom V. (eds), Guidance, Control, and Evaluation in the Public Sector, New York: De Gruyter, pp. 495510.
Ostrom E. (1990), Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ostrom E. (1995), ‘Designing Complexity to Govern Complexity’, in Hanna S. and Munasinghe M. (eds), Property Rights and the Environment: Social and Ecological Issues, New York: Beijer International Institute for Ecological Economics and World Bank, pp. 3345.
Ostrom E. (1999), ‘Institutional Rational Choice: An Assessment of the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework’, in Sabatier P.A. (ed.) Theories of the Policy Process, Boulder CO: Westview Press, pp. 3571, at 60.
Ostrom E. (2005), Understanding Institutional Diversity, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Ostrom E. (2007), ‘A Diagnostic Approach for Going beyond Panaceas’, Proceedings of the National Academies of Sciences 104 (39): 15,181–7.
Ostrom E. (2009), ‘A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-ecological Systems’, Science 325 (5939): 419–22.
Ostrom E. (2010), ‘Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems’, American Economic Review 100 (3): 641–72.
Ostrom E. and Cox M. (2010), ‘Moving beyond Panaceas: A Multi-tiered Diagnostic Approach for Social-ecological Analysis’, Environmental Conservation 37 (4): 451–63.
Ostrom V. (1976), ‘John R. Commons’ Foundations for Policy Analysis’, Journal of Economic Issues 10 (4): 839–57.
Ostrom V. and Ostrom E. (1972), ‘Legal and Political Conditions of Water Resource Development’, Land Economics 48 (1): 114.
Posner E. (2000), Law and Social Norms, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Pound R. (1910), ‘Law in Books and Law in Action’, American Law Review 44 (1): 1236.
Schlager E. and Ostrom E. (1992), ‘Property-rights Regimes and Natural Resources: A Conceptual Analysis’, Land Economics 68 (3): 249–62.
Smith H. E. (2009), ‘Community and Custom in Property’, Theoretical Inquiries in Law 10: 541.
Theesfeld I. (2004), ‘Constraints on Collective Action in a Transitional Economy: The Case of Bulgaria's Irrigation Sector’, World Development 32 (2): 251–71.
Woodward C. V. ([1955]2002), The Strange Career of Jim Crow, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Yandle B. (1983), ‘Bootleggers and Baptists: The Education of a Regulatory Economist’, Regulation,
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Institutional Economics
  • ISSN: 1744-1374
  • EISSN: 1744-1382
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-institutional-economics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 5
Total number of PDF views: 104 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 775 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 28th February 2017 - 22nd January 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.