Skip to main content

The intellectual orders of a market economy

  • KÁROLY MIKE (a1)

Not only do ideas matter in economic development but so do the institutions of intellectual debates in which ideas are formed. Scholars usually point to intellectual debates whose institutions are largely exogenous to the economy (e.g. those of religion or science). I suggest that economists should also consider intellectual debates that are initiated by economic actors. I set out to understand the role of intellectual debate in the economy and, drawing on Polanyi's concept of ‘intellectual order’, the institutions that emerge endogenously to support it. Professional communities and public intellectual spheres are shown as the most important examples. Three historical cases are given as illustrations. I conclude that these intellectual orders should be included among the fundamental ‘institutions of capitalism’, along with the catallactic institutions of property and contract.

Corresponding author
Hide All
Allen R. C. (1983), ‘Collective Invention’, Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 4 (1): 124.
Benner C. (2003), ‘Learning Communities in a Learning Region: The Soft Infrastructure of Cross-Firm Learning Networks in Silicon Valley’, Environment and Planning A, 35 (10): 1809–30.
Bourdieu P. (1990), ‘The Intellectual Field: A World Apart’, in In Other Words: Essays towards a Reflexive Sociology, Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 140–9.
Bourdieu P. (1983), ‘The Field of Cultural Production, or: The Economic World Reversed’, Poetics, 12 (4–5): 311–56.
Bowles S. (1998), ‘Endogenous Preferences: The Cultural Consequences of Markets and Other Economic Institutions’, Journal of Economic Literature, 36 (1): 75111.
Buchanan J. M. (2001), ‘The Potential for Tyranny in Politics and Science’, in Moral Science and Moral Order: The Collected Works of James M. Buchanan, Vol. 17, Indianapolis: Liberty Press, pp. 153–70.
Casson M. (1982), The Entrepreneur: An Economic Theory, London: Gregg Revivals.
Casson M. (1990), ‘Entrepreneurship’, in The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics. Available at (accessed 5 January 2016).
Chandler A. D. Jr [1977](1995), The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business, Cambridge, MA, and London: Harvard University Press.
Coase R. H. (1974), ‘The Market for Goods and the Market for Ideas’, American Economic Review, 64 (2): 384–91.
Coase R. H. and Wang N. (2013), How China Became Capitalist, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dahl M. S. and Pedersen C. Ø. R. (2004), ‘Knowledge Flows through Informal Contacts in Industrial Clusters: Myth or Reality?’ Research Policy, 33 (10): 1673–86.
Dasgupta P. and David P. A. (1994), ‘Toward a New Economics of Science’, Research Policy, 23 (5): 487521.
Foss K., Foss N. J. and Klein P. G. (2007), ‘Original and Derived Judgment: An Entrepreneurial Theory of Economic Organization’, Organization Studies, 28 (12): 1893–912.
Fuller L. L. and Winston K. I. (1978), ‘The Forms and Limits of Adjudication’, Harvard Law Review, 92 (2): 353409.
Glaeser E. L., Kallal H. D., Scheinkman J. A. and Shleifer A. (1991), ‘Growth in Cities’, Working Paper No. 3787, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Greif A. (2006), Institutions and the Paths to the Modern Economy, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Habermas J. (1984), Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, translated by T. McCarthy, Boston: Beacon Press.
Hayek F. A. (1945), ‘The Use of Knowledge in Society’, American Economic Review, 35 (4): 519–30.
Hayek F. A. (1982), Law, Legislation and Liberty, London: Routledge.
Hodgson G. M. (2015), Conceptualizing Capitalism: Institutions, Evolution, Future, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Jacob M. C. (2006), The Radical Enlightenment: Pantheists, Freemasons and Republicans, 2nd ed., Lafayette: Cornerstone.
Jacobs J. (1985), Cities and the Wealth of Nations, New York: Vintage Books.
Jones C. (2005), ‘Growth and Ideas’, in Aghion P. and Durlauf S. (eds), Handbook of Economic Growth, Vol. 1, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 1063–111.
Kenney M. (ed.). (2000), Understanding Silicon Valley: The Anatomy of an Entrepreneurial Region, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Leighton W. and López E. (2012), Madmen, Intellectuals, and Academic Scribblers: The Economic Engine of Political Change, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Matthews R. C. (1991), ‘The Economics of Professional Ethics: Should the Professions be more like Business?’ Economic Journal, 101 (407): 737–50.
McCloskey D. (2010), Bourgeois Dignity: Why Economics Can't Explain the Modern World, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
McCloskey D. and Klamer A. (1995), ‘One Quarter of GDP is Persuasion’, American Economic Review, 85 (2): 91195.
McQuade T. J. and Butos W. N. (2003), ‘Order-Dependent Knowledge and the Economics of Science’, Review of Austrian Economics, 16 (2–3): 133–52.
Mokyr J. (2005), ‘The Intellectual Origins of Modern Economic Growth’, Journal of Economic History, 65 (2): 285351.
Mokyr J. (2007), ‘The Market for Ideas and the Origins of Economic Growth in Eighteenth Century Europe’, Tijdschrift voor Sociale en Economische Geschiedenis, 4 (1): 338.
Mokyr J. (2016), Culture of Growth: Origins of the Modern Economy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Moore G. and Davis K. (2004), ‘Learning the Silicon Valley Way’, in Bresnahan T. and Gambardella A. (eds), Building High-Tech Clusters: Silicon Valley and Beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 739.
North D. C. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ogus A. (2000), ‘Self-Regulation’, in Bouckaert B. and de Geest G. (eds), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, Volume V. The Economics of Crime and Litigation, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 587602.
Ostrom E. (2005), Understanding Institutional Diversity, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Phelps E. (2015), Mass Flourishing: How Grassroots Innovation Created Jobs, Challenge, and Change, Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Polanyi M. (1962), ‘The Republic of Science’, Minerva, 1 (1): 5473.
Polanyi M. [1951](1998), The Logic of Liberty, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
Polanyi M. and Prosch H. (1976), Meaning, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rodrik D. (2014), ‘When Ideas Trump Interests: Preferences, Worldviews, and Policy Innovations’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28 (1): 189208.
Saxenian A. L. (1994), Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Shaked A. and Sutton J. (1981), ‘The Self-Regulating Profession’, Review of Economic Studies, 48 (2): 217–34.
Stark R. (2005), The Victory of Reason: How Christianity Led to Freedom, Capitalism, and Western Success, New York: Random House.
Stephan P. E. (1996), ‘The Economics of Science’, Journal of Economic Literature, 34 (3): 1199–235.
Tarko V. (2015), ‘Polycentric Structure and Informal Norms: Competition and Coordination within the Scientific Community’, Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 28 (1): 6380.
Tunzelmann G. N. (1995), Technology and Industrial Progress: The Foundations of Economic Growth, Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
Tversky A. and Kahneman D. (1974), ‘Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases’, Science, 185 (4157): 1124–31.
Vanberg V. J. (2010), ‘The ‘Science-as-Market’ Analogy: A Constitutional Economics Perspective’, Constitutional Political Economy, 21 (1): 2849.
Walstad A. (2002), ‘Science as a Market Process’, Independent Review, 7 (1): 545.
Weber M. [1923](1927), General Economic History, transl. Knight F. H., New York: Greenberg.
Williamson O. E. (1985), The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms. Markets, Relational Contracting, New York: Simon & Schuster.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Institutional Economics
  • ISSN: 1744-1374
  • EISSN: 1744-1382
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-institutional-economics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 9
Total number of PDF views: 53 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 327 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 8th February 2017 - 23rd February 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.